Page 1 Trading Company AFS FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE TRADING COMPANY (PTY) LTD Holistic over view of operating performance (Using a traffic light system to quickly highlight performance) 1. RONA - Return on Net Operating Assets 2010 18.4% 2009 21.2% Net Operating profit (Income Statement) Net Operating Assets (Balance Sheet) 135 735 84 396 Note: Net Operating Assets - take total net Assets‚ and add back cash‚ overdraft balances‚ tax and dividends. These are financing factors‚
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Inventory
ABSTRACT Ford Motor Company have been around since 1903‚ and although in the past they lost market shares due to production and marketing scandals‚ they remain robust in 2005. This paper has been written to thoroughly analysed Ford through PESTEL analysis to comprehend the macro environment in‚ Porter’s Five Forces analysis to determine the competition and lastly SWOT analysis to depict the micro environmental factors of the company in question. It has been concluded that due to the fierce competition
Premium Ford Motor Company Automotive industry General Motors
Ford Motors. produces light systems for cars and sells them for 100€ each. Full capacity is 20.000 per month‚ but is currently producing 18.000 systems per month for its regular customers. The company reports the following monthly results: Per unit Total Revenue 100‚00€ 1.800.000‚00€ Direct materials Direct Manufacturing Labor Variable Manufacturing OH Fixed Manufacturing OH 25‚00€ 10‚00€ 22‚00€ 3‚00€ 450.000‚00€ 180.000‚00€ 396.000‚00€ 54.000‚00€ Variable Selling Expenses 19‚00€
Premium Mass production Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Company background of FORD Ford company ‚ the third largest automobile company in this entire world as known as one of the greatest automobile manufacturers of all time. The automaker was founded by Henry Ford ‚ and it was incorporated on June 16‚ 1903.Alexander Y. Malcomsom ‚ the coal dealer finance another automobile company. Carry on ‚ the partnership ‚ “Ford and Malcomson” was formed and the pair designed a car began ordering parts. However ‚ Malcomson was constrained by his coal business demands
Premium Ford Motor Company
current of ratio of Ford is 120 percent while the current ratio of GM is 89 percent. The current ratio measures the company’s ability to pay short term and long term obligations. As Ford has the higher current ratio over GM‚ it depicts that Ford is more capable of paying its obligations to the creditors. The quick ratio of Ford is 110 percent while GM has 73 percent. Quick ratio is an indicator of company’s short-term liquidity. As Ford has the higher quick ratio over GM‚ it shows that Ford has more
Premium Balance sheet Financial ratios Asset
Ford Motors Case Study Celyn S. Pappas FIN/571 January 19‚ 2015 Kenneth Baker Ford Motors Being able to highlight and define the most relevant financial ratios and how to interpret the meaning is important for analyzing financial statements and the financial health of an organization. There are five financial ratio categories‚ and this essay will explore 4. First is liquidity‚ which will establish if the organization has the ability to pay its bill if operating cash is able to pay short-term
Premium Financial ratios Balance sheet Financial ratio
QUESTION 1 i. Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liability = $ 14‚651‚000/$ 19‚639‚000 = 0.750 ii. Quick Ratio = (Current Assets – Inventory) / Current Liability = ($ 14‚651‚000 – $ 6‚136‚000) / $ 19‚539‚000 = 0.436 iii. Total Assets Turnover = Sales/Total Assets = $ 167‚310‚000/$ 108‚615‚000 = 1.540 iv. Inventory Turnover = COGS/Inventory = $ 117‚910‚000/$ 6‚136‚000 = 19.216 v. Receivable Turnover = Sales/Account Receivables = $ 167‚310‚000/$ 5‚473
Premium Balance sheet Financial ratios Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
product offerings. Firm Analysis Ford started the decade lagging behind foreign competitors in production efficiency and technological advances in new product development. However‚ by the end of the decade Ford was the industry leader in alternative fuel vehicles. Additionally‚ Ford cut their production cost by $2 billion over the last six years and once again has positive profit margins. Recommendations Ford should continue to develop new alternative fuel vehicles as
Premium Automotive industry Ford Motor Company General Motors
Alan Mulally‚ CEO‚ Ford Motor Company Mike Stout Strayer University Abstract This paper discusses the role of leadership and how an organizations performance is impacted by leadership and leadership development. The paper discussed Alan Mulally’s leadership styles and gives examples of how Mulally’s actions fit those leadership styles. The paper talks of how Ford Motor Company’s performance is impacted by Alan Mulally’s goal setting. The paper speaks to how Mulally’s communication openness impacts
Premium Ford Motor Company Leadership
top by enacting initiatives that will attract consumers. The following analysis will show how Ford has used consumer behavior/elasticity to create a product line that not only meets customer demand‚ but has given Ford the competitive edge in the auto industry. They are called the “Big Three” of the automotive industry; Ford‚ General Motors‚ and Chrysler. While GM and Chrysler flounder financially‚ Ford continues on a progressively successful road. This is based on smart managerial decision making
Premium Supply and demand Price elasticity of demand Consumer theory