Ford Pinto Case study The moral issue of the Ford Pinto case is whether or not Ford Company is responsible for the explosion caused by the failed tank. Ford is morally responsible for the incident since it could have been prevented‚ public safety should be their top priority when designing their products‚ and they have disregarded the utilitarianism principle. Ford is responsible for the Ford Pinto incident because of many reasons. First of all the engineers and the top managers of the company
Premium Ford Pinto Cost-benefit analysis Decision making
WHO’ BENEFITING? – CASE STUDY Cevdet KIZIL Master of Science in Organizational Leadership Program 1- Will the incentive plan to reduce absenteeism succeed? In my opinion‚ the incentive plan to reduce absenteeism will probably succeed because it brings some new implementations. For example‚ if a chronically absent employee exceeds the standard‚ then vacation‚ holiday and sickness/accident pay will be cut by ten percent through the next six months. Additionally‚ in case worker absence continues
Premium Incentive Incentive program Motivation
Week 1 Case Study- Ford and Toyota 5/26/13 1. Which schools of management thought are illustrated in this case? When Ford was founded in 1903‚ Henry Ford followed the classical management thought to a “T” (no pun intended!) They made one car in one color. The classical management thought believes there is “one best way” to do things to accomplish a goal. Ford wanted to produce cars quickly to meet with demands‚ so at that time the classical management thought made perfect sense. Another part
Premium Pun Automobile
evaluation processes‚ and other company factors‚ is beneficial for the investors (Brealey‚ Meyers & Marcus‚ 2009). The following report will provide the investor with a clear picture of the company’s current status as well as future projection in order to demonstrate investment opportunities. Specifically‚ this report examined xxx Company’s financial ratios and other factors using a trend table over the past five years. Return on assets (ROA) measures company earnings in relation to other resources
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Investment
THE FORD CASE Executive Summary After carefully analyzing Ford’s existing supply chain I immediately became aware of its highly complex nature. This high level of complexity combined with other internal and external factors have pushed Ford to search for solutions in order to overcome the costly supply chain challenges that they are facing and may continue to face in the future. Ford’s major difficulty in their present system is: the inefficient control of
Premium Supply chain Customer service Supply chain management
Question 7: In our opinion‚ we think that Ford Company is morally wrong if the savings resulting from not improving the Pinto gas tank had been passed on to force’s customers. We will say is morally wrong because Pinto do not meet the safety standard propose by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The safety standard of NHTSA is to reduce fires from traffic collisions. This standard required that all new cars produced by 1972 should be able to withstand a rear-end impact
Premium Ford Motor Company Ford Pinto Station wagon
General Motors and Chrysler were forced to accept the offer while Ford decided to go it alone. Ford’s position may have been arrogant. It may have been fool hearted. It may have been a strategy used to wrestle away some of the power held by the unions. In either case‚ Ford was forced to restructure the company and made painful concessions to ensure its future. At the same time unions played a vital role by conceding to Ford’s insistence. Ford has rebounded unlike GM or Chrysler. Ford recorded
Premium Ford Motor Company Automotive industry General Motors
similar or different to what may motivate you if you worked at SAS. What motivates Jim goodnight is that he has assembled a company with loyal employees that enjoy working in the organization. Jim believes that” if you treat employees as if they make a difference to the company‚ they will make a difference” to the company. (Hellriegel & Slocum‚ 2011) As stated in the case just having the ability to work in relax and stress free environment makes the job more productive which is a great factor
Premium Motivation Employment Management
Organizational Planning at Ford Motor Company Organizational Planning at Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company manufactures and distributes vehicles around six continents making it one of the largest automotive manufacturer’s in the world. The company has a strong market position as a result of its product portfolio that gives Ford significant competitive advantage in the marketplace. However‚ Ford Motor continues to strive to become the world’s leading consumer company for automotive products and
Premium Ford Motor Company Plug-in hybrid Automotive industry
CASE STUDY REPORT The decisions and culture leading to the fall of General Motors CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………….iii 1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………..4 2. EXTERNAL FACTORS IN DECISION MAKING……………………….4-5 3. BOUNDED RATIONALITY……………………………………………….5-7 4. BUSINESS CULTURE…………………………………………………...7 a. The Power-Distance Relationship……………………………...7 b. Uncertainty Approach……………………………………………8 5. THE CONFORMITY APPROACH……………………………………...8-9 6
Premium Decision making General Motors Supply and demand