Capital Structure by Kyung Hwan Shim University of New South Wales Australian School of Business School of Banking & Finance for FINS 1613 S1 2011 May 14‚ 2011 ∗ These notes are preliminary and under development. They are made available for FINS 1613 S1 2011 students only and may not be distributed or used without the author’s written consent. ∗ 1 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Financial Leverage 3 M&M Proposition I: Capital Structure Irrelevance 4 M&M Proposition II: Capital Structure Irrelevance
Premium Capital structure Finance Capital
LEVELS OF CONTEXT 6 THE FORD-FIRESTONE CRISIS FACTS 8 CONCLUSION 12 REFRENCES Error! Bookmark not defined. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURES Figure 1. Network Setting of Ford-Firestone Crisis 5 Figure 2. Levels of Context 7 EQUATIONS Equation 1. Primitive Form of Constitutive Rule 6 Equation 2. Primitive Form of a Regulative Rule 7 CHAIRMAN SUMMARY In the late 1990’s and early 2000’s several accidents were reported of Ford Explorers equipped with Firestone
Premium Ford Motor Company
to work in teams irrespective of their locations. Organizations in many industries are face with the decision of how best to incorporate technology into their organization’s structure. While technology is available to an organization‚ it is most effective when the technology enhances the organization’s strategy‚ structure‚ communication‚ employee relationships and the company’s overall performance. Technology today has moved from what Henderson & Venkatraman (1993) refers to as a “back office” position
Premium Technology Non-profit organization Organization
Organization Structure Paper Any successful company must rely on being well organized in order to be successful. The organization must have departments that have clear roles and descriptions on what each individual or department is assigned to do. Regardless of what the company or organization does‚ the organizational structure in each is similar somehow. This paper will discuss the organizations structure‚ and how the organizations functions create for a positive and encouraging environment for
Premium Management Corporate governance Chief executive officer
0 Introduction Identifying and investigating the structures of community power remains one of the central challenges of community development theory and practice. Researchers have long sought to understand and measure the distribution of power in organizations‚ local communities‚ nations and around the world. Hence classical studies of community power tended to identify elitist (Hunter‚ 53; Mills‚ 56) or Pluralist (Dahl‚ 61; Truman‚ 51) structures. These studies were carried out using different
Free Sociology Religion Social structure
Organizational Strategy‚ Structure‚ and Process^ RAYMOND E. MILES University of California‚ Berkeley CHARLES C. SNOW The Pennsylvania State University ALAN D. MEYER University of Wisconsin‚ Milwaukee HENRY J. COLEMAN JR. University of California‚ Berkeley Organizational adaptation is a topic that has received only limited and fragmented theoretical treatment. Any attempt to examine organiza-^ tional adaptation is difficult‚ since the process is highly complex and changeable. The proposed theoretical
Premium Organizational structure Management Organization
Theory of Capital Structure - A Review Stein Frydenberg£ April 29‚ 2004 ABSTRACT This paper is a review of the central theoretical literature. The most important arguments for what could determine capital structure is the pecking order theory and the static trade off theory. These two theories are reviewed‚ but neither of them provides a complete description of the situation and why some firms prefer equity and others debt under different circumstances. The paper is ended by a summary where the
Premium Corporate finance Capital structure Finance
1) Evaluate the motives of Both Changan Automobiles of China and Ford Motor Co. of USa in forming the Changan ford joint venture. 2) Using section 10.4 describe the type of strategic alliance‚ the motives for alliance‚ and highlight the issues with their probable causes. 3) Make recommendations to the CEO and senior managers of Changan-Ford on how they can address the cross-cultural issues identified. The Changan Ford Joint Venture: Same Bed but still different dreams? 1. This joint venture
Premium Ford Motor Company Joint venture
Leadership in Ford Motor Company‚ US and Europe‚ 1980s and 1990s Success in Ford US Pascale (1990‚ pp 119-121) studied a range of American companies during the 1980s and concluded that Ford US stood alone in appearing to have truly transformed itself. In 1980 it lost $3.3 billion. In 1986 it surpassed GM in profits for the first time since 1924. In 1987 it broke all previous industry records for profitability. The process started when‚ seeking ways of turning the company around‚ a Ford task force
Premium Ford Motor Company Management Strategic management
Ford Value Enhancement Plan (VEP) In April 2000‚ Ford Motor Co. announced a shareholder Value Enhancement Plan (VEP) to significantly recapitalize the firm’s ownership structure. Ford had accumulated $23 billion in cash reserves and under the VEP would return as much as $10 billion of this cash to shareholders. In exchange for each share currently held‚ the plan would give stockholders one new share plus the choice of receiving $20 in either cash or additional new Ford common shares. Shareholders
Premium Stock Stock market Dividend