A Financial Ratio Quarterly Trend Analysis of: Ford Motor Company Computations Line Item | Beginning of Year | | | | | Inventory | | | | $5‚901‚000 | | | | | Total assets | | | | $178‚348‚000 | | | | | Owners ’ equity | | | | $15‚028‚000 | | | | | Number of common shares | | 3‚816 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2012 | 6/29/2012 | 3/30/2012 | 12/30/2011 | | Line Item | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Annual | Current
Premium Ford Motor Company Balance sheet Asset
impact the performance of Ford Motor Company as an organization by examining the relationship between the nature of the organization and its external environment using SWOT‚ PESTLE and PORTERS FIVE FORCES. 1.2 Context Ford Motor Company is one of the largest automotive manufacturers in the world. The company manufactures and distributes automobiles across six continents. With 80 manufacturing facilities worldwide‚ the company’s core and affiliated automotive brands include Ford‚ Lincoln‚ Mercury and
Premium Ford Motor Company Plug-in hybrid Fuel economy in automobiles
Case 5: The Case of the Ford Pinto Refer to this case‚ of about the Ford Pinto case‚ I have been read about this topic from web pages and forum that have been discuses. Here are some of studies that I have been made to finish this paper work in different aspects of ethics and professionalism. In the ‘Ford Pinto Case Study’‚ it seems clear that Ford management and its engineers did not intend to make an unsafe product‚ and that more than likely the outcome of their product resulted primarily from
Premium Ford Motor Company Ethics Ford Pinto
decision making framework was Utilitarian in nature‚ Ford chose the action that would cause the least amount of harm for the majority involved‚ therefore allowing the minority to be harmed by death. Apparently‚ Ford did not care about the type or severity of harm they caused. They chose a lower number of estimated deaths as opposed to a higher number of financial harm. The decision to view death as a viable option was fueled by Egoism. Fords CEO‚ Iacocca‚ was an integral part of the Egoism utilized
Premium Morality Risk Human
AGENDA: 1. Ford visit 2. UPS visit Ford has the history of providing excellent products ranging from small cars to luxurious brand to its customers. They are known for good quality and service. It is great privilege to know how the company works and to see the processes that they do to produce a good car. Last February 2013 we were given the chance to witness how things go inside the plant of Ford in Cologne. At first‚ a person with
Premium Ford Motor Company Automotive industry General Motors
Engine Fuel Tank Capacity (liters) Displacement (cc) Compression Ratio Maximum Power (ps/rpm) Maximum Torque (Nm/rpm) Engine Type Fuel System Bore x Stroke (mm) Powertrain Engine Type Max. Output Drive Configuration Max. Torque Transmission Dimension & Weights Wheelbase (mm) Maximum Pick-Up Box Length (mm) Maximum Payload (kg) Ground Clearance (mm) Steering System Steering Wheel Steering Column Type Minimum Turning Radius (m) Brake System Type (Front / Rear) Type and Diameter (Front / Rear) Handbrake
Premium Steering Wheel Tire
Running head: FORD PINTO CASE (Newton‚ Ford‚ 2007‚ p. 1)Ford Pinto Case External social pressures play a big part in the decision reached about the Ford Motor Company. When you have highly respected individuals such as retired NASA engineer Dr. Leslie Ball say “The release to production of the Pinto was the most reprehensible decision in the history of American Engineering” (Newton‚ Ford‚ 2007‚ p. 1); there is cause for concern. There would be more
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company Station wagon
Case (The Ford Pinto) There was strong competition for Ford in the American small-car market from Volkswagen and several Japanese companies in the 1960’s. To fight the competition‚ Ford rushed its newest car the Pinto into production in much less time than is usually required to develop a car. The regular time to produce an automobile is 43 months but Ford took 25 months only (Satchi‚ L.‚ 2005). Although Ford had access to a new design which would decrease the possibility of the Ford Pinto from
Premium Ford Pinto
product offerings. Firm Analysis Ford started the decade lagging behind foreign competitors in production efficiency and technological advances in new product development. However‚ by the end of the decade Ford was the industry leader in alternative fuel vehicles. Additionally‚ Ford cut their production cost by $2 billion over the last six years and once again has positive profit margins. Recommendations Ford should continue to develop new alternative fuel vehicles as
Premium Automotive industry Ford Motor Company General Motors
Executive summary Ford Motor Company is based in Dearborn‚ Michigan; it is the second largest industrial corporation in the world‚ with revenues of more than 144 billion and about 370‚000 employees. Operations span 200 countries. Although ford obtains significant revenues and profits from its financial services subsidiaries‚ the company’s core business remains the design and manufacture of automobiles for sale on the consumer market. Since Henry Ford‚ founder of Ford‚ incorporated in 1903
Premium Ford Motor Company Automotive industry Supply chain management