Expert Witness The expert witness is expected to have many criteria making him or her eligible to give their expert advice‚ opinion‚ or findings on a subject matter of which they have specialized knowledge better than that of the average person. The expert witness also needs to be relevant in the case‚ so having a doctor of child psychology wouldn’t be relevant giving an expert opinion on an insurance fraud case. Typically an expert witness is called in to aid the judge or jury to be better prepared
Premium Expert Critical thinking Evidence law
Psychologist Expert Testimonies The Courtroom and the Quagmire of Psychologist’s in Expert Testimonies. Agnes M. Sigovich University of New Haven Psychologist Expert Testimonies The Courtroom and the Quagmire of Psychologist’s in Expert Testimonies. The roles and ethical dilemmas of psychologists as exert witnesses in our court system are undeniably ambiguous. These issues of morality can be seen throughout many case studies. When forensic psychologists
Premium Psychology Expert witness Expert
"We believe that experts are more able to process information than we can and they are able to come to better conclusions than we could come to on our own." But is it so? I will be going over the two different opinions: Should we rely on experts to help us make decisions or not? Some people believe that we must rely on the experts‚ primarily because due to their authoritative opinion‚ we spend less time dealing with the problem. It is also convenient because the conscience of the decision lies not
Premium Critical thinking Expert Decision making
Application 1 Randal Huff 12/12/2010 Forensic psychology deals with the field of psychology and the law. The death penalty has always been‚ and will always be‚ a topic of controversy from the issue of its constitutionality to the variability in its application. The article I read provides focus upon the role of the forensic psychologist‚ specifically as it applies to mitigation (Atkins at el). Psychologists were beginning to act as expert witnesses in criminal trials throughout Europe
Premium Convention on the Rights of the Child Expert witness Psychology
why it is that evidence gained through the forensic science process is almost always considered to be circumstantial evidence. The most important fact that makes forensic evidence circumstantial is because science cannot be clearly defined by law. The legal system have created standards and written legal rules regarding the admissibility of forensic evidence. When forensic evidence that is presented in court is rarely unaccompanied by an expert witness to provide the court room with a professional
Premium Questioned document examination Evidence law Fingerprint
ADMISSIBILITY OF THE OPINION OF A COMPUTER FORENSICS EXAMINER AS AN EXPERT EVIDENCE UNDER NIGERIAN LAW OF EVIDENCE By Philip O Nwachukwu As a general rule under Nigerian law of Evidence‚ the opinion evidence is irrelevant in court trials. Thus section 66 of the Evidence Act CAP E14‚ Laws of the. Federation of Nigeria (LFN)‚ 2004 provides that the fact that any person is of the opinion that a fact in issue‚ or relevant to the issue‚ does or does not exist‚ is irrelevant to the existence of such fact
Premium Evidence law Expert Expert witness
What and why is Forensic Psychology Important in Legal Proceedings? Beth Velez Southern New Hampshire University Justice 101-Introduction to Criminal Justice Forensic psychology is an important part of the legal system‚ dating back to 1921. I plan to show in my paper just how forensic psychologists conduct their assessments‚ the implications on what the assessment and testing shows‚ and how it can benefit not only the defendant‚ but society as well. Forensic psychologist can show if a person is
Premium Psychology Psychiatry Expert witness
The Role of Forensic Accountants in the Development of Judicial Process By: Nnoruem Timothy O. M.Sc Accountancy PROBLEM STATEMENT In recent times‚ the world has witnessed the failure of large corporate organizations which has been attributed to large scale fraud by Directors in connivance with auditors. There is the case of Enro in the U.S‚ Parmalat in Italy and many cases in the U.K such as Polly Peek‚ Maxwell communications and BCCI. This development brought about in
Premium Accountant Court Accountancy
Expert witnesses are useful to courts in order to help determine the right sentence for an accused (Pozullo et al‚. 2016). However‚ mental health expert witnesses have always been controversial in the justice system‚ In order to figure out if an expert testimony should be accepted in court‚ Canadian courts follow the Mohan criteria (Pozullo et al.‚ 2016). The list of criteria was established due to the R. v. Mohan case‚ in 1994 (Pozullo et al.‚ 2016). Mohan was a pediatrician accused of sexually
Premium Jury Expert Evidence law
The Expert Witness By Jeffrey Archer* ’Damn good drive’ said Toby‚ as he watched his opponent’s ball sail through the air. ’Must be every inch of 230‚ perhaps even 250 yards‚’ he added‚ as he held up his hand to his forehead to shield his eyes from the sun‚ and continued to watch the ball bouncing down the middle of the fairway. ’Thank you‚’ said Harry. ’What did you have for breakfast this morning‚ Harry?’ Toby asked when the ball finally came to a halt. ’A row with my wife‚’ came back his opponent’s
Premium Murder Evidence Gun