The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be violated‚ and no warrants shall issue‚ but upon probable cause‚ supported by oath or affirmation‚ and particularly describing the place to be searched‚ and the persons or things to be seized." In other words‚ it protects citizens from searches and seizures by the government that are not supported
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Law
criminals face justice‚ but it raises the question of how far are these officials able to go before they are unreasonably invading people’s privacy? That is generally what the 4th Amendment deals with‚ protection against unreasonable search and seizure. The current case of Jones vs. United States is a suit dealing with the 4th Amendment and has large implications‚ as it could set precedent for whether or not GPS tracking can be used without a warrant. A tracking device was put on his Jones car by police officers
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution contains the Citizenship Clause‚ the Due Process Clause‚ and the Equal Protection Clause. The Citizenship Clause maintains the citizenship of individuals who were born or naturalized in the United States. The Due Process Clause maintains that a state is prohibited from denying an individual of “life‚ liberty‚ or property‚ without due process of law.” The Equal Protection Clause prohibits a state from denying an individual “within its jurisdiction
Premium Abortion Supreme Court of the United States Roe v. Wade
Michelle Davis Criminal Procedure and Evidence 1/15/17 Homework Assignment One 1) The fifth amendment prohibits double jeopardy (del Carmen‚ 2014). The concept behind prohibiting double jeopardy is to protect the defendant from being tried and punished twice for a single crime‚ but this doesn’t mean that after a verdict is handed down the process ends (del Carmen‚ 2014). They can try and get an appeal so that their case and verdict will be reviewed (del Carmen‚ 2014). 2) Justices and judges
Premium Same-sex marriage Homosexuality Marriage
technology testing the Fourth Amendment? With all the new technology‚ police are now using devices that could potentially “see through walls”. They are also using other search techniques such as wiretapping to conduct searches rather than a “physical search” and by doing so; they can “legally” avoid violating the Fourth Amendment. A lot of the Fourth Amendment has also been weakened significantly over the years from Federal Court Case and the new technology. The fourth Amendment is “The right of the
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
courts. Judiciary examination of the Fourth Amendment asked the question of whether
Premium
Fernandez v. California: Fourth Amendment Upheld? POL 303 August 4‚ 2013 The Merit case of Fernandez v. California is seeking to determine whether the Constitutional rights of Walter Fernandez were violated under the 4th Amendment when law enforcement conducted a search of his residence upon obtaining consent from his girlfriend‚ who was also a resident‚ after Fernandez was taken into custody (and had stated his objections to the search while at the scene). In Georgia v. Randolph (2006)
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Act vs. the fourth amendment; The rights of the American people set in place in 1791 becoming dim and gray in the eyes of the government. The uproar that was created by the government on June 06‚ 2013 was enough to catch the ears of all Americans. The fourth amendment was being over ruled. No one knew how to stop‚ what this will lead too and who gave the government the power to do it. Or could it be something more sinister. A bylaw set in place to overrule the fourth amendment. Ways to get
Premium United States Constitution Federal Bureau of Investigation Law
I. The confrontation clause of the sixth amendment to the United States constitution provides that all criminals’ prosecutions‚ the accused shall exploit the right to confront the witnesses against him. the Confrontation Clause applies to ``witnesses’’ against the accused‚ meaning ``those who ’bear testimony’’ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confrontation_Clause 1. The sixth amendment goes on to protect the right of the accused person on trial to confront witnesses
Premium United States Constitution Law Jury
A Book Review of The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch This book review will identify the important origins of Ch’an Buddhism in China through The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch‚ which has been edited and transcribed by Phillip Yampolsky. This book provides the most accurate origins of the Tun-huang text‚ which was found in a “sealed cave in Central Asia” (Yampolsky 5). This authentication of the text defines the origins of the Lankavatar School‚ which identifies a story of the Buddha
Premium Zen Buddhism Mahayana