Negligent misrepresentation Define: Where a plaintiff acts to their financial detriment in reliance upon a statement of information or advice given by a defendant Features of relationship: Speaker knows or ought to know: Trusted by recipient to give information recipient believes speaker has capacity to give The information is of a serious or business nature Speaker knew or ought to have known that recipient intended to rely on the information Reasonable for recipient
Premium Tort Negligence Tort law
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all‚ I would like to say thank you express to all the lecturers for the course of Master of Science (Construction Contract Management)‚ especially my supervisor – Encik Norazam Othman‚ for their guidance during the writing of this master project. Without their supervision and advice‚ this project could not be completed on time. Secondly‚ I would like to express my gratitude to my dearest parents and brother for their support and advice during these few months. Not
Premium Contract Common law
eyes of law‚ a company is a legal person with a separate entity distinct from its members of shareholders. In essence it means that there is a veil or curtain separating the legal entity of the company from its members or shareholders.• When any fraudulent and dishonest use is made of the legal entity‚ the individuals concerned will not be allowed to take shelter behind the corporate personality. The Courts will break through the corporate shell and apply the principle of ‘lifting or piercing the
Premium Corporation Legal entities Types of companies
G. Ryan said‚ “The subprime crisis was caused by firms and households making bad operating‚ investing‚ and financing decisions‚ managing risks poorly‚ and in some instances committing fraud.” (Ryan‚ Stephen G.) Aside from fraud and the misrepresentation of information‚ people did not follow simple rules of smart accounting. When accounting one needs to take into consideration the real amount of debt being issued and the ability of the debtor to repay that debt. Loans were being offered to buyers
Premium Subprime mortgage crisis Subprime lending Debt
Fazio appealed the case because he claims that Cypress committed misrepresentation by silence and his case also falls into “the category of claims for which an action for fraudulent inducement lies”. When cypress promised to provide buyer with all information in its passion‚ which was in the LOI (letter of internet) that Cypress did agree too. Fazio did fulfill his own side
Premium
Case Study Of The Contracts Act 1950 situations‚ there are three different contracts made between Allan and the bus conductor‚ Allan and Sally and Allan and Abu. Allan was trying to trick or lie to the bus conductor‚ Sally and Abu. The issue for the case Allan and the bus conductor and Allan and Sally is whether there is a valid contract between the two parties. For the case Allan and Abu‚ the issue is whether Abu can avoid the contract or not. The bus conductor‚ Sally and Abu can get compensation
Premium Contract
Internet fraud is a problem that has become very widespread in recent years. Internet fraud was first monitored by the Internet Fraud Watch organization in 1996. The Fraud Watch has stated that each year after its inception internet fraud has increased. In 1998‚ the Securities and Exchange Commission established the Office of Internet Enforcement to fight online securities fraud which was another sign of how large the problem is becoming (Clausing). Despite the SEC¡¦s efforts this problem has
Premium Internet Abuse Facebook
reserves to cover the inadequate current period earnings. These manipulations and misrepresentations do not allow fair comparisons of the results of operations between years. In this case the misrepresentation gave a totally false picture of the success of its subscription television systems and interfered with the ability of users to correctly analyze the financial information of the firm. These misrepresentations impaired the decision-making ability of the financial statement users and defeated
Premium Income statement Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Certified Public Accountant
4. NOTES 4.1. THE ESSENTIALS OF A VALID CONTRACT A. ESSENTIAL No 1 The Parties Must Act Within Their Contractual Capacity What is contractual capacity? We view it in relation to the concepts of personality and legal status: PERSONALITY – determines that you are a legal entity or persona. As a result of this personality you acquire legal status ie your legal status defines that legal personality further. STATUS then describes your legal “condition” eg a married woman‚ A public
Premium Contract
article that "the net effect of all these deals was to create a misrepresentation of the company." Critical Issue The intent to deceive the public and Enron‚ Inc. investors by concealing the true value of the corporation’s stock and by management’s willingness to commit fraudulent acts while directing subordinates to participate. Critical factor #1: Increase in management compensation a major incentive in creating fraudulent financial reports. By making the managements incentives focal to
Premium Enron Balance sheet Financial statements