Slippery slope is an informal fallacy of weak induction. It draws a conclusion from events of an exaggerated and improbable chain reaction. The following DIRECTV commercial shows a clear example of a fallacy of slippery slope: “When you wait forever for the cable guy‚ you get bored. When you get bored‚ you start staring out windows. When you start staring out windows‚ you see things you shouldn’t see. When you see things you shouldn’t see‚ you need to vanish. When you need to vanish‚ you fake your
Premium William Shakespeare Hamlet Death
always accurate. In the article‚ Miner argues that because labor “unions have been increasing wage rates” and a depression‚ inflation‚ and unemployment have ensued means that the labor unions have caused these economic downturns. According to Post-Hoc Fallacy‚ this reasoning isn’t always correct because there could be other factor influencing the economic problems other than the labor unions. Raised interest rates‚ deregulation‚ and even wars can affect the economy in harmful ways; the connection between
Premium United States International trade Economics
I found several videos that give good examples of logical fallacies. All the DirecTV commercials in this compilation are good examples of the slippery slope fallacy. Each commercial shows how having cable TV can lead to a chain of events that result in bad outcomes. These commercials used the slippery slope fallacy on purpose to entertain the audience. A slippery slope fallacy claims that once you make one choice‚ a chain of events will inevitably follow. The truth is that making the first choice
Premium Critical thinking Argumentation theory Marketing
PE R SP EC TI V ES O N P SY CH O L O G I CA L S CIE N CE Free Will in Scientific Psychology Roy F. Baumeister Florida State University ABSTRACT—Some actions are freer than others‚ and the difference is palpably important in terms of inner process‚ subjective perception‚ and social consequences. Psychology can study the difference between freer and less free actions without making dubious metaphysical commitments. Human evolution seems to have created a relatively new‚ more complex form of
Premium Psychology Free will
Logical Fallacies is done manipulatively‚ always done on purpose and targets people’s ignorance and more of stupidity. The trial of the slave known as tituba is a perfect example of logical fallacy‚ because she had got beat really bad. Sweeping generalization is a logical fallacy where it can be named too broadly and where it can be applied to a general statement. Tituba fitted in this logical fallacy because people back then thoughtthough slaves were uncleaned and very low of the slaves and especially
Premium Salem witch trials Witchcraft The Crucible
Fallacies and “Dirty Tricks” Identification The first person to try and categorize and systematically describe fallacies was Aristotle. He managed to identify thirteen different fallacies and divided them into two groups: Informal and Formal. The Informal Fallacy is hard to find because they can only be found and identified when you analyze the content of the argument. The Formal Fallacy is easy to identify because there is a defect to it and when you look at the logical formation of
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Logic Fallacy
the dramatic Fallacy to keep ratings high‚ media seek strange/violent incidents to report/create dramas around murder makes up less than 1% of all crime‚ yet from watching TV or reading the papers‚ it seems like a commonplace events seems that most murders are well-planned‚ grisly affairs‚ or they happen solely by random chance in fact‚ most murders start as arguments that escalate into violence most crimes are relatively minor property crimes 2. the cops and courts fallacy police work made
Premium Sociology Criminology Crime
PCR0025 Critical Thinking All Foundation ONLINE NOTES LOGICAL FALLACIES Logical fallacy: An argument that contains a mistake in reasoning. 2 major groups: 1. Fallacies of relevance 2. Fallacies of insufficient evidence Fallacies of Relevance Mistakes in reasoning that occur because the premises are logically irrelevant to the conclusions. 1. Personal Attack 2. Attacking the motive 3. Look Who’s Talking (Tu Quoque) 4. Two Wrongs Make a Right 5. Scare Tactics 6. Appeal to Pity 7
Premium Critical thinking Fallacy Logic
Nica Javier CRITHIN A62 Ms. Hazel Biana August 5‚ 2013 “Thank You for Smoking” film viewing Identifying fallacies paper. The movie‚ “Thank You for Smoking” is a comedy with a tobacco industry lobbyist‚ Nick Naylor as the lead. The movie has an eerie comic theme which tackles the serious issue of the addicting substance of tobacco‚ or to be more specific‚ nicotine. The idea which the movie was trying to portray was that this lobbyist was a great speaker who is able to manipulate many
Premium Fallacy Attacking Faulty Reasoning
will be three exams throughout the semester. Each exam is worth 25% of your final grade. Thus‚ the three exams together make up 75% of your total grade. The format of each exam will consist of multiple choice‚ matching‚ and (possibly) short answer/essay questions. Content for each exam will include material presented in lecture‚ information from the textbook‚ assigned readings‚ and information presented by guest speakers. The exams are not cumulative; however an overall understanding of the concepts
Premium Academic dishonesty Psychometrics Assessment