Owing the Government Our Obedience: Socrates’ defense for Not Doing Injustice When Injustice is Done to You In the dialogue of “Crito” by Plato‚ a person by the name of Crito has come to try and persuade Socrates to escape from jail as he feels he is being wrongfully accused. Socrates basically asks Crito to plead his case and if he can come up with enough good reasons then Socrates will escape‚ if not he will stay. As Crito begins attempting to persuade him‚ Socrates ends up stating two main premises
Free Plato Aristotle Rhetoric
agenda’s‚ truth is sometimes ignored or becomes irrelevant. The question is if truth has become so twisted that it doesn’t really exist in its original meaning anymore? If truth has been lost there must be a substitute‚ this is where post-truth originated. Post-truth is when decisions are based upon emotions rather than facts‚ this is dangerous because each person feels a different way and therefore can justify melding a subject to fit their own liking. Post-truth has caused all truths to be called
Premium
Validity refers to truth and accuracy when it comes to dealing with research. Validity and reliability go hand in hand with each other‚ one depending on the other is some aspect or another. There are many different types of validity that researchers can use‚ as well as‚ methods used for measurements. Having so many available options leaves validity vulnerable for threats concerning the research. The main threats concerning validity are: self-selection effects‚ volunteer effects‚ attrition‚ history
Premium Psychometrics Reliability Scientific method
Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (1963)‚ Karl Popper suggests that no scientific theory can be classified as truth. The only thing that can be done is to attempt to falsify the theory over and over again reject the theory repeatedly in different situations. Each failed attempt will strengthen the theory and bring it closer to the truth. Hence‚ Popper claimed that the truth of a hypothesis can never be confirmed. A hypothesis is an “if-then” statement‚ which that is an assumption of causality
Premium Scientific method Observation Hypothesis
RUNNING HEAD: VALIDITY‚ CREDIBILITY‚ AND RELIABILITY Validity‚ Credibility‚ and Reliability Paper XBCOM/275 Week 3 Assignment Beverly Clarkson November 21‚ 2014 Daniel Anderson
Free Source Critical thinking Taxation in the United States
Reliability and Validity Sophia Fonash Walden University Reliability and Validity Whiston (2013) has explained that reliability is the qualification for having validity. The instrument can be reliable but does not mean it is valid. However‚ the assessment must be reliable to be valid. Whiston (2013) stated that if the inventory can measure something consistently but it may not be measuring what the assessment is supposed to measure then it is reliable but not valid. II. Purpose and Nature of the
Premium Psychometrics Reliability Measurement
Evaluating a Website for Credibility Rebekah Reed Chamberlain College of Nursing NR500: Foundation Concepts and Applications Fall 2012 Evaluating a Website for Credibility With so many health-related websites on the internet it was hard to choose one. I settled on one that is personal to me and that I do a lot of teaching on with patients. I chose American Diabetes Association at www.diabetes.org. This website is found by searching any of the search engines. This website has both a consumers
Premium Patient Health care Health care provider
References: Grand Canyon University Tutorials (GCU-T). (no date). Evaluating Websites. Retrieved on January 19‚ 2011 from http://tutorials.gcumedia.com/evaluatingWebPageContent/interactiveIndex.html Grand Canyon University (GCU-L). (no date). Syllabus. Retrieved on January 19‚ 2011 from http://angel04.gcu.edu/AngelUploa
Premium Website Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder Grand Canyon
has periodic evaluations in order to measure its effectiveness. Accordingly‚ Internal Validity concept is applied in order to score the outcomes. Internal Validity is” the approximate truth about inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships” (Trochim‚ 2016). Internal validity is considered at the time of the investigation that measures the results of social programs or interventions. Internal validity observes positive and negative results in order to improve or eliminate services. Therefore
Premium Sociology Psychology Social psychology
Galinda Individual Validity and Reliability Matrix Internal consistency--The application and appropriateness of internal consistency would be viewed as reliability. Internal consistency describes the continuous results provided in any given test. It guarantees that a range of items measure the singular method giving consistent scores. The appropriateness would be to use the re-test method in which the same test is given to be able to compare whether the internal consistency has done its
Premium Psychometrics Validity