Albert Parsons was not a dangerous man because he was just fighting for better working conditions. In document A‚ Albert Parsons testimony states that they are just fighting to have better working conditions that they deserve (Document A). The intentions that Albert Parsons has are only to help with working conditions. Wanting to get less working hours and higher pay is not a crime. Therefore‚ Parsons should not be thought as a criminal just because he wants better working conditions. In document
Premium
This case displays a situation in which Parsons is up for a new promotion. The student has to discover if he should be eligible or if he should be looked over. He is a do it kind of guy and does not follow the chain of command. However‚ it is this innititive that I admired. He did not graduate from Harvard and does not act as properly as others from these types of elite schools. Should this be frowned upon or admired due to his ability to take risks. What do you think‚ should he get it or not? Read
Premium Management Morgan Stanley Decision making
Management of People at Work Rob Parson Case Study 1 Case Overview The internal environment at Morgan Stanley was one of teamwork‚ employee development‚ dignity and respect. Morgan Stanley had developed a way of building consensus rather that individualism. Rob Parson was thrust into this environment – not sure of what was expected of him and with only one objective in mind – improving the performance of the Capital Markets division. He went about doing this ruthlessly without much care about
Premium Motivation Morgan Stanley Feedback
Rob Parson ’s performance assessment The performance assessment of Rob Parson should be separated into two parts‚ the external performance and internal performance. It will start by having an evaluation on Rob Parson’s current on job performance. The first part will focus on Rob Parson’s contribution to the company profit this year‚ which gives an overview of his general performance in fulfill his job requirement in Morgan Stanley. Then for internal ‚ we would like to measure Parson internally
Premium Morgan Stanley Evaluation Human resource management
Based on the documents‚ it can be inferred that Albert Parsons was indeed a threatening man. In document c‚ it asserts that the anarchists‚ including Albert Parsons‚ were very fond of dynamite (Document C). As known‚ dynamite is a high explosive substance that stimulates destruction and chaos. The evidence suggests that since Parsons was very affectionate to the use of dynamite‚ it can be inferred that he is a very chaotic and destructive individual that only seeks extremist methods to accomplish
Premium
was difficult to perform and had seen a tremendous amount of turnover at MS. Nasr had the fear of losing Parson‚ his valuable employee and a star producer if he was not promoted to Managing Director as promised by Nasr during his hiring. Rob Parson‚ Principal‚ Capital Market Services (CMS) had played a critical role in making significant gains in building MS’s revenue and reputation. Parson was an outstanding individual contributor‚ who in his sincere‚ relentless attempt to generate more business
Premium Management
Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (“MS”) Executive summary Paul Nasr is a senior managing director (“MD) at MS in the Capital Markets (funding) area. He has 20 yrs of experience and was hired by Mack (the new boss at MS) to lead the Capital Markets (“CM”) area. Capital Markets is the link between Sales & Trading and the Investment Banking Division (“IBD”) and their main function is to raise funds. Sales &Trading area sale the products that Capital markets originate. Investment Banking and CM are interrelated
Premium
Morgan Stanley. The analysis will be focused on identifying the major problems‚ analyzing the situations‚ and making feasible and thorough recommendations for the board of Morgan Stanley to improve the existing situations. 2. Problem Statements. Rob Parson was a star producer in the Capital Market Services Department who had been recruited from a competitor two years ago and had generated substantial revenues since joining the firm. I would like to address more specific and surface problems for this
Premium Management Managing director Morgan Stanley
Case Analysis: Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (A) 1. Evaluate the effectiveness of the Morgan Stanley performance assessment and management system. The primary source of performance assessment at the firm is a multi-source 360 degree feedback tool. The secondary source is an employee’s self assessment. There are a number of issues as to why the primary tool is not effective in truly assessing the performance of an employee at Morgan Stanley. The first issue surrounds the reliability of
Premium Management Human resource management Performance appraisal
Leadship:enhancing the lessons of experience Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (A) Contents Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (A) 1 Contents 2 Provide a background of the case 3 Should Rob Parson be promoted? 3 Exhibit 3. 4 Conduct the performance appraisal conversation 5 Background Under the leadership of John Mack‚Morgan Stanley was transforming itself into a "One-Firm Firm."They’re very value their employee.They treating each other with dignity and respect.ohn Mack recruit Paul Nasr to
Premium Financial services Teamwork Insurance