According to Niccolo Machiavelli‚ in his first chapter of “The Prince‚” princedoms‚ states can be either republics or princedoms and these last ones can be either acquired new which I suppose by conquest or power‚ or they could be inherited by a prince’s ancestors. The 1500s were still times where there were many kings and princes all over europe and the world. But it was also a time where many republics were born‚ or they were young and growing republics. When Machiavelli said “...and he who acquires
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence
that Niccolò Machiavelli is more than qualified.Although this sixteenth century politician’s key motive was to unite a separate Italy‚ his political theories have been taken into deep contemplation and are frequently exercised in politics today. The point of my paper is to review the benefits of appointing Noccolo Machiavelli as the secretary of state‚ analyze his theory‚ “Is it better to be loved or feared” and discuss the human nature in modern society. Niccolo Machiavelli is known as
Premium Political philosophy Florence The Prince
In machiavelli’s The Prince‚ Machiavelli discusses many of the traits and requirements a leader needs to rule properly. Machiavelli discusses many ideas and requirements a rule must do one of which is if you can’t be both loved and feared it is better to be feared than loved. In: machiavelli’s view being feared brings more loyalty from his people than being loved‚ he bases this on his view of people as a whole‚ which in my opinion is a strong argument that was definitely true in his time and still
Premium Political philosophy Love Fear
loved than feared‚ or the reverse. The answer is‚ of course‚ that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together‚ anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved…” (Machiavelli 43). The quote explains that greater security of power is achieved through being a feared leader rather than a loved one. The aspect of fear is important in ensuring that the state remains loyal and obedient towards the leader‚ which reduces the
Premium Political philosophy Trust The Prince
willing to do anything to achieve his goals. In Their Eyes Were Watching God Joe Starks seeks to create an idealistic black community. While this may seem to be a good thing‚ Joe Starks was very cunning in the way he set out to create this town. Both Machiavelli and Joe Starks believed any of their actions could be justified to ensure their success in ruling the town or state. Neither one of them was genuinely concerned about the citizens; they were egotistical‚ arrogant and motivated to gain power. When
Premium The Prince Machiavellianism Virtue
the result desired‚ regardless of the means used to obtain the goal. Niccolo Machiavelli responds in the book The Prince that moral compromise is justified in politics. On the other hand‚ Thomas More the author of Utopia believes that moral compromise is justified in politics to an extent. A character in Utopia‚ Raphael Hythloday‚ believes that moral compromises are not justified in politics. To begin‚ Niccolo Machiavelli responds in the book The Prince that moral compromise is justified in politics
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Cesare Borgia
Western Political Theory Professor Roger Paden Authored by Jorge A. Osuna Concerning Machiavelli’s Philosophy Niccolò Machiavelli was a very complex thinker who displayed his thought through several works. There is strong biographical evidence that suggests that the author worked on The Prince and The Discourses at the same time‚ writing the former’s first draft in 1513 and starting to write the latter during the same year. It is obvious then that in order to understand the essence of The
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence
belong to others‚ and not being opposed to using force in order to obtain that which he desires. Despite possessing these Machiavellian qualities‚ Macbeth is not a true Machiavellian leader. According to Machiavelli‚ a prince should avoid being hated by all‚ which Macbeth doesn’t do so well. Machiavelli says a prince should avoid being cruel‚ rapacious‚ a violator of the property and women of one’s subjects‚ because “…you will find [the] cruel and rapacious– men who… did not hesitate to commit every
Premium Macbeth Machiavellianism The Prince
Compare and contrast the different ways in which a prince can rise to power. According to Machiavelli‚ there are four main ways a prince can come into power. The first way is through prowess‚ meaning personal skill and ability. The second is through fortune‚ meaning good luck or the charity of friends. The third way is through crime‚ such as through a coup‚ conspiracy‚ or assassination. The fourth way is constitutional‚ meaning through the official support of either nobles or common people.
Premium The Prince Political philosophy Prince
liberality makes the leader despised‚ hated and poor. If he is despised by the people‚ the people will arrange a conspiracy against the prince; therefore‚ the prince needs to satisfy the people to some extent (Machiavelli 3). To do this the prince will arm the people and soldiers (5). Nicolo Machiavelli also states another quality that the prince must lack is greed and abuse of woman (3). Machiavelli’s ideal leader uses meanness and cruelty as a weapon to instill peace and loyalty (1). The good leader
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence