Hampton Machine Tool Company 1. Hampton Machine Tool Company was founded in 1915 and was based out of the St. Louis area. It was a manufacturing firm serving the automobile and aircraft industries. Due to the strong automobile market and defense spending for the Vietnam war‚ the company was seeing record production and profits through the 60’s and early 70’s. After that‚ the Arab oil embargo‚ the increase in the price of Gasoline and the then recession was taking its toll on the Company’s financials
Premium Stock market Finance Capital expenditure
RE: HAMPTON MACHINE TOOL COMPANY TO: Jerry Eckwood‚ Vice President of St. Louis National Bank SECTION I St. Louis National Bank has to decide whether or not to grant a loan renewal request by a local company‚ Hampton Tool Company. The existing loan is due to be repaid in fifteen days and the president of the company‚ Benjamin Cowins‚ is also requesting an additional loan of $350‚000 for planned equipment purchases in October 1979. Until December 1978‚ Hampton Tools had maintained a capital
Premium Stock Supply chain management Inventory
Technical Problem The Metric Machine Parts and Supplies Corporation (MMPS) is a large growing global business with a few network problems. MMPS have many difficulties with their current network service that has been monitored by a third party telecommunication network who does not think anything is wrong with their service. Some of the technical difficulties that MMPS faces are frequent telecommunication network crashes that lead to bad customer services satisfaction to their customers. Due to the
Premium Telecommunication Customer service
Units Unit Cost Total Cost From the Beginning Inventory 1840.00 20.00 36800.00 From the first purchase 600.00 20.25 12150.00 From the second purchase 380.00 21.00 7980.00 2820.00 56930.00 From the Second purchase 420.00 21.00 8820.00 From the third purchase 400.00 21.25 8500.00 From the second purchase 200.00 21.50 4300.00 1020.00 21.20 21620.00 Units Unit Cost Total Cost From the Beginning Inventory 1020.00 21.20 21624.00 From the first purchase 700.00 21.50 15050.00 From the second
Free FIFO and LIFO accounting Inventory
1. On 1st Jan’ 1988 Megha corporation issued eight percent 50‚ 00‚000 bonds of Rs 100 each at Rs 103. Issue cost was 0.5% of the amount raised. On 1st Jan 2008‚ Five years before its maturity the firm wanted to call the bonds at Rs 108. The corporation spent Rs 80‚000 on reacquisition of bonds. What accounting entries would be passed in the books of Megha Corporation? 2. On 1st January 2009 Shweta corporation purchased 10‚00‚000 of its fully paid shares at Rs 22 per share. On 20th January 2009
Premium 2009 Stock market Stock
Case Study: The Black & Decker Corporation (A) Power Tools Division Course: International Marketing Management Prof. Dr. Lutz H Schminke Authors: Marc Gerlach (323514) Tobias Holler (725219) Björn Kleindienst (425169) Robin Mack (223377) Marina Sukhareva (127387) Celia Yan (431144) Fulda‚ 24th May 2011 Table of Content Table of Content 2 1. Introduction 2 2. Case Summary 3 2.1 The Black & Decker Corporation
Premium Brand management Marketing Trademark
Case Study: The Corporation 1. In the mid 1800s the corporation emerged as a "legal person" by way of maneuvering in the legal system. For the next 100 years we saw the rise to dominance of the corporation. The corporation created unprecedented wealth but at what cost? The externalities of corporate operations are responsible for countless cases of illness‚ death‚ poverty‚ pollution‚ exploitation and lies. Voice your opinion on this. Who Is Responsible for regulating these Corporations?‚ The Government
Premium Corporation Capitalism Business
HAMPTON MACHINE TOOL COMPANY About The Company Hampton Machine Tool was established in 1915 and has been manufacturing machine tools since its foundation. Hampton company’s customer base is made up primarily of aircraft manufacturers and automobile manufactures in the St. Louis area. It experienced record production and profitability during the years. Sales and profitability declined in the mid-1970s with the withdrawal from Vietnam War and the oil embargo. However‚ the company had stabilized the
Premium Inventory Dividend Financial ratio
Case #1 CAINSBORO MACHINE TOOLS CORPORATE Question 1. What risks does the firm face? What is the limit of Exhibit 8 in terms of the risk analysis? From the article‚ there are two major risks the company face. First‚ the company’s financial condition is not very good. From 2003 to 2004‚ the gross profit declined from 314‚522 thousands to 257‚759 thousands. This leads the company suffer from an operating loss in 2004. For the first quarters of 2005‚ the board declared no dividend. This
Premium Dividend Dividend yield P/E ratio
effective. Disadvantage : * 40% payout ratio will increase the cost of debt and put at risk it s investment opportunities * According to Asquith and Mullins (1986‚36) dividend signalling is more effective for lower risk firms‚ which Gainesboro is not. * Raise the capital to pay dividend by borrowing more will lead to an increase of debt to equity ratio and consequently financial risk. Reaction of various providers of capital : * Gainesboro’s shareholding is constituted at 26%
Premium Finance Investment Economics