at large (Cooper et al. 2010). Evidence Based Arguments against Mandatory HPV Vaccination Childhood immunizations‚ such as measles‚ chicken pox‚ and polio‚ are mandatory for school-aged youth and are required because of their highly contagious nature‚ especially in settings where people congregate in large numbers (De Jong and Bouma‚ 2001). Therefore‚ parents question whether there is justification for mandating that children be vaccinated against a sexually transmitted virus‚ one that can only
Premium Human papillomavirus HPV vaccine Cervical cancer
cannot be altruistic‚ the idea that humans can have an ulterior motive‚ as it is just simply human nature. The Expected Benefit argument claims that only self-interest motivates human action. I believe that Psychological Egoism‚ is a true theory that holds strong arguments as to why‚ all human actions are motivated by self-interest‚ because whatever argument is made against this theory can always be refuted back to the idea that any action that
Premium Egoism Ethical egoism Individualism
Maria K. Philosophy Mar. 6‚ 2012 Arguments Against Moral Relativism Moral relativism is the belief that the morally correct decision to make‚ when faced with a moral dilemma‚ is the one that is acceptable within the context of a given culture. This means that the correct decision varies depending on the culture in which one makes it. Today‚ with great variability between societies and cultures‚ moral relativism is greatly accepted as a matter-of-fact‚ but this is not necessarily the case
Free Morality Culture
sides that are either for or against whether or not it would be beneficial to rescind the guidance presented in this letter from 2011. As I did my research into this particular issue‚ it became apparent to me that most media‚ news articles‚ and forums were strictly against Secretary DeVos’ plan to remove the guidelines in place. It seems that there were two main reasons people were against her plan. According to civil rights attorney Alexandra Brodsky‚ most are against Devos’ intention to rescind
Premium Sexual intercourse Human sexual behavior Rape
“Animal rights” are rights that are believed to belong to animals to live free from any use in medical research‚ hunting‚ and other services to humans. For the past 20 years‚ there has been a long ongoing debate about whether experiments on animals for the benefit of medical or scientific research is ethical. “Animal rights teach us that certain things are wrong as a matter of principle‚ that there are some things that it is morally wrong to do to animals” (BBC-Animal Rights). This says that human
Premium Animal rights Rights Human rights
When it comes to Proposition 8 I would have voted against it all the way. I have often thought what gives anyone the right to take away civil rights from anyone gay or straight. I personally have struggled with this debate on so many different levels it still unbelievable to me that in court in the world would deny civil rights down to such a basic level. The fourteenth Amendment clearly has a double standard attached to it when it comes to Proposition 8. Basically saying that we can’t deny gays
Premium Same-sex marriage Homosexuality United States
This isn’t true‚ mainly because funding NASA gives our nations brightest challenging and unique problems that need unique and brilliant solutions‚ and that is how an breakthrough occurs. Acclaimed Astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson said “Water filters. A NASA invention. You can say‚ “I need a way to
Premium NASA Space exploration International Space Station
11/26/12 Final Paper: Argument Against Gun Control The argument on firearm regulation has been a heated discussion for many years. On one side of the debate‚ we have people in favor placing restrictions on guns‚ while‚ on the opposite end of the spectrum‚ we have people fighting the regulation of guns. People in favor gun restrictions believe gun control can reduce crime ‚while‚ the people against gun control believe having the right
Premium Firearm Gun politics in the United States Crime
certain of our actions as humans are necessarily right or wrong. What would happen if we say two contradictory statements can’t coexist as Aristotle demonstrated? Through the law of non-contradiction from Aristotle and ethical absolutism‚ I will argue against ethical relativism. In ethical absolutism‚ there is only one answer on certain human actions‚ following an objective moral code. According to absolutists‚ this code has been the same ever since humans have existed. Logically‚ this code applies to
Premium Morality Ethics Relativism
Capital Punishment What are some of the arguments used for and against capital punishment? Some of the basic arguments for and against the taking of human life in certain instances are suicide and war. Most religious arguments in taking of human life believe it is Gods responsibly not our place in deciding when a life should be taken. How does the ethical debate on capital punishment touch on the issues of the value of human life‚ human rights‚ and human dignity? Only when an innocent life
Premium Murder Human rights Morality