offer of $42‚500 for the real estate and $250 for a dinner bell and flower pots. Smith signed the agreement but Behee notified an agent of Smith that he had withdrawn the offer before he received notice of the acceptance. Hendricks brought an interpleader action against Behee and Smith and Behee filed a cross claim against Smith. The court awarded $997.50 to Hendricks and the balance to Behee. Smith appealed. In the case of Stevenson Jaques & Co v McLean (1880) states that A "mere inquiry" not a counter-offer
Premium Contract Contract law Offer and acceptance
Sir Albert James Smith Birthplace: Born in Shediac‚ New Brunswick in the county of Westmoreland on March 12‚ 1822. Death: Died at age 62 on June 30‚ 1883 after a lengthy illness at his residence in Dorchester‚ New Brunswick. Education: Reared in relative comfort‚ Albert James Smith attended the Madras school of the Church of England and continued his education at the new Westmoreland county Grammar School. And upon leaving that institution he became a student at law in the office of the late Edward
Premium Family England Mother
Private Equity: Leveraged Buyouts Intro Case: Martin Smith Martin Smith—Case Objectives • Examine components of PE compensation and their relative weight – Case Exhibit 4 (difference between Salary and Total is Carried Interest) • Evaluate difference between IRR and Multiple on Investment (two return metrics) – Case Exhibit 6 • Begin to explore differences among funds as an employee and investor – trade-offs include compensation‚ track record‚ strategy‚ focus‚ reputation‚ risk
Premium Investment Private equity Leveraged buyout
1. Material Fact : In this case both parties were entered into leasing agreement. As regard to the agreement‚ the respondent were stated as lessor while appellant as lessse. Thus‚ the appellant was defaulted in payment for areas of rent and the payment for leasing of the equipment. Eventhough‚ the respondent were given several notice and warning for defaulted payment the appellant still failed to pay. Therefore‚ the respondent were taking back the printing equipment unfortunately the appellant were
Premium Sharia Civil procedure Common law
reflect the way each product line caused overhead costs. Based off of my research I recommend either allocating overhead based on total labor hours or splitting the overhead into cost pools and using appropriate cost drivers for each pool. In this case the cost pools should be based on the cutting‚ assembly‚ and finishing manufacturing functions and a general cost pool to reflect the additional costs that cannot be directly traced to a product line. Either of these methods would more appropriately
Premium Allocation
GM is the used of modern biotechnology techniques to change the genes of an organism‚ such as a plant or animal. But there are a lot of debate surrounding this topic. For some‚ the idea of GMO food is a good one because the modifications allow crops to become resistant to drought and infestations‚ increasing food supply. But the others think this is a dangerous proposition which an lead Antibiotic resistance‚ allergens and toxins to food and so on. Today we will discuss about both side of this
Premium Food Bacteria Antibiotic resistance
Case Test 1‚ Case 1-39 Research and discussion case: Smith & Company a. The following view can be prepared for permitting public accounting firm to sell their ownership interest to individuals not in public accounting from incorporation: 1) Assessing capital in the economy is enhanced which makes the allocation of scarce resources efficient within the economy. 2) Since public accounting firm participate against companies that are permitted to get in a certain manner‚ they must not be constrained
Premium Certified Public Accountant Corporation Accountant
ICLR: Appeal Cases/1974/HOWARD SMITH LTD. APPELLANT AND AMPOL PETROLEUM LTD. AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS [ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES] - [1974] A.C. 821 [1974] A.C. 821 [PRIVY COUNCIL] HOWARD SMITH LTD. APPELLANT AND AMPOL PETROLEUM LTD. AND OTH-ERS RESPONDENTS [ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES] 1973 Nov. 26‚ 27‚ 28‚ 29; Dec. 3; Lord Wilberforce‚ Lord Diplock‚ 1974 Feb. 14 Lord Simon of Glaisdale‚ Lord Cross of Chelsea and
Premium Stock Shareholder Corporations law
Patient: Smith‚ Jane DOB: 06/ 13/ 1985 Date of Interview: 02/05/2010 Date of Report: 02/06/2010 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION: Ms. Smith is a 24 year old white woman currently residing in Vancouver‚ WA. She is employed as a hairstylist and currently lives in an apartment with two friends and their newborn son. Ms. Smith has been seen for mental health symptoms previously as a teenager‚ and was referred again on this visit by a colleague. The following report information is based on information collected
Premium Medicine Patient Physician
Organizations and Industry Context 3 Firm Structures 6 Strengths‚ Weaknesses‚ Opportunities and Threats 9 Insights from the Structural Frame 14 Conclusion 15 Illustrations 18 Works Cited 21 Introduction General Motors (GM) and Toyota are both well-known companies in the automotive industry. They offer quality products to their customers and try to maintain the high standards of each of the companies. General Motors and Toyota offer vehicles of different models but are
Premium General Motors Automotive industry