Question 1 (b) The problem looks at whether the existence of contract entitled Albert to claim for a breach of contract from Charlie with four elements of contract to be established here: that the offer been made by Albert and has been accepted by Charlie‚ that parties intend to create legal relationship and that the consideration was provided. The issue here is to determine if a reasonable person would consider offer had been made. An offer may be described as the indication of one person to another
Premium Contract Contract law
Scott entered into a unilateral contract with Hume. Scott used the large signboard to offer $1000 to the ballplayer who hit a homerun over the sign. This is a promise for an act. Hume completed the performance of the act by hitting the homerun over the sign and therefore the unilateral contract between them was formed. Perry and Scott do not have a contract. The offer that he is intending to collect on was never actually offered to him as Otis did not change the sign in the allotted time frame
Premium Contract
Unit 8 Project Questions: Part I 1. Under HIPAA‚ are you legally allowed to view this patient’s medical information? Why or why not? Under HIPAA you are not legally allowed to view a patients medical information unless you have written consent‚ but because he just had outpatient surgery and signed a HIPAA release of information form so you are able to view his information. 2. In this case‚ how would you be able to correct your error and provide the missing documents to the patient while
Premium Medical record Medical history Physician
Course Project 2 Keller Graduate School of Management PM592‚ Professor Marcus Williams‚ 20 February 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 3 1. SCHEDULE #1 3 2. performance analysis 6 3. estimate at completion 7 4. control plan 10 5. revised estimate at completion 12 6. schedule #2 14 APPENDIX APPENDIX A – Schedule 1 APPENDIX B – Schedule 2 Executive Summary We are here to discuss the “Theme Park” project that we were set to complete. To date we are 40% complete with
Premium Week-day names
LABOUR LAW PROJECT ON Judicial interpretation of the expression „arising out of and in the course of employment‟ Prepared By Shreya Prabhudesai S.Y. L.L.M. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sr. No. Particulars Page No. 1. Introduction 3 2. Employer’s liability for 4-23 compensation 3. Doctrine of Notional Extension 23-28 4. Occupational Diseases 28-31 5. Conclusion 32 6. Bibliography 33 2 Judicial interpretation of the expression
Premium Employment
Leading Building and Sustaining Performance and Excellence GM 588 Managing Quality 4-16-2011 Russell Roberson Introduction “The North Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (DJJDP) were established in July 2000 as the first cabinet-level agency to focus on juvenile justice issues and at-risk youth in the state”. Seeking to provide a single cabinet-level agency focused on deterring juvenile from crime through sanctions and prevention programs‚ former Governor
Premium W. Edwards Deming Six Sigma Control chart
Microsoft’s Strategy Plan Project Class: NETW583 Session: September 2013 Section I – Microsoft’s Technology Strategy “Global Diversity and Inclusion are integral to the vision‚ strategy‚ and business success of Microsoft. Microsoft officially formed the Office of Diversity & Inclusion in recognition of the fact that leadership in the global marketplace requires a corporate culture and an inclusive business environment where the best and brightest
Premium Microsoft Steve Ballmer Technology
Charles Dong LBS Prof Calderon Legal Assignment Two Enforceability of the Pet Clause in the Lease Rafi should have the right to keep Roscoe in his apartment because his landlord cannot enforce the pet clause of the lease based on the given facts. On one hand‚ the bilateral mistake in the contract invalidates the lease‚ and therefore the pet clause is no longer enforceable. Also‚ the doctrine of promissory estoppel can be used to help Rafi not only keep his dog in the apartment but also
Premium Contract Contract law
The following situations are similar (all involve the theft of Makoto’s laptop computer)‚ yet they represent three different crimes. Identify the three crimes‚ noting the differences among them. 1 While passing Makoto’s house one night‚ Sarah sees a laptop computer left unattended on Makoto’s porch. Sarah takes the computer‚ carries it home‚ and tells everyone she owns it. 2 While passing Makoto’s house one night‚ Sarah sees Makoto outside with a laptop computer. Holding Makoto at gunpoint
Premium Theft Robbery
Explain the facts‚ issues and reason in the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. FACTS The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company made a product called the "smoke ball". It claimed to be a cure for influenza and a number of other diseases‚ in the context of the 1889-1890 flu pandemic (estimated to have killed 1 million people). The smoke ball was a rubber ball with a tube attached. It was filled with carbolic acid (or phenol). The tube would be inserted into a user’s nose and squeezed at the bottom
Premium Invitation to treat Contract Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company