schools(private and govt.)in rural and urban India.I can substantiate my conclusion with different surveys and datas prepared by govt. and non-govt. agencies that still in rural area more than half of the schools have negligible basic infrastructure. As far as Mid-day meal scheme is concerned I have worked on this in 23 blocks.I know what type of food-grain comes for the food and how officials and department of education works on this?My NGO has also done survey regarding basic infrastructural facilities
Premium City School Rural area
Celebrities do not have a right to privacy IntroductionBackground: Celebrities are famous people who earn a lot of money and live luxurious lives. They often have problems with paparazzi and journalists who always find out about their lives and chase them. Journalists think celebrities don’t have a right to privacy because however celebrities argue that they are normal people and therefore need privacy too. Thesis Statement: This essay will argue that celebrities do not have a right to privacy because
Premium Celebrity ARIA Charts People
Review on We have No “Right to Happiness” By: C.S. Lewis In class we read three different essays including ‘The Dying family’ by J.H. Plumb‚’ Does Fatherhood Make You Happy?’ By Daniel Gilbert‚ and ‘We Have No Right to Happiness’ by C.S. Lewis. Though the purpose of these essays can be very controversial to some‚ after reviewing all three essays I have picked my favorite‚ or the one I agree with and disagree with most. ‘We have no Right to Happiness’ makes a very good argument on the point
Premium Happiness Human rights Suicide
stories about the private life of famous people which are shown in the media day by day. Some people believe that famous people have the right to privacy like other normal people. On the other hand‚ other claim that celebrities have chosen public life so they cannot ask for privacy. This essay will argue that famous people should not have the right to privacy simply because they are public’s idol and living a public life make them more famous. The first reason why celebrities
Free Celebrity People Political spectrum
"What Rights Did Women Have" What rights do you bealive a women has compared to a man? Do you think they have just as much or less than a hard working respectable man. If you aren’t sure about your answer then continue reading about an officer of the Women’s Rights from 1848-1928. Today it is November of 1903 and there are me‚ and many other guards and police officers waiting on the landing dock of Plymouth‚ England. Around noon the steam boat appeared out of the misty
Premium Women's suffrage Women's rights Gender
Review Sheets for Chapter 20.1 1. Assuming the following reaction proceeds in the forward direction‚ 3 Sn4+(aq) + 2 Cr(s) 3 Sn2+(aq) + 2 Cr3+(aq) 4+ a. Sn (aq) is the reducing agent and Cr(s) is the oxidizing agent. b. Cr(s) is the reducing agent and Sn2+(aq) is the oxidizing agent. c. Sn4+(aq) is the reducing agent and Sn2+(aq) is the oxidizing agent. d. Cr(s) is the reducing agent and Cr3+(aq) is the oxidizing agent. e. Cr(s) is the reducing agent and Sn4+(aq) is the oxidizing agent. 2. The
Premium Oxidizing agent Electrochemistry Hydrogen
trade or advertising purposes without consent. Some states recognize two types of appropriation: 1. Private People’s Right of Privacy: using their name or picture without consent would cause embarrassment‚ shame‚ emotional distress‚ but this wouldn’t hold for people who seek out and depend on publicity. They don’t suffer emotional harm from public attention. 2. Celebrity’s Right of Publicity: unauthorized usage causes loss of money (recognized in more than 20 states). As in the case Midler v
Premium Ford Motor Company Ethics Business ethics
1. Why can’t any legal system be truly “neutral?” according to the author. The legal system can’t be truly neutral because of the hierarchical status of some people 2. How was the justice system used to control southern blacks after slavery? Don’t know 3. Did society recognize a major difference between poor people and criminals? Society favors those who own property and those in right positions‚ the lash of the criminal justice system fall on the poor people. The author states that respectable
Premium Law Criminal justice Crime
Everyone has a right‚ we human begins have a right. So why shouldn’t animal have their rights? Human beings are no different from other animals‚ with no divine or elevated nature which makes us distinct. Human beings are ethically bound not to use other animals for their own selfish purpose. If human beings are no different from other animals‚ then like all other animals is it our nature to kill any other animal which serves the purposes of our survival and well-being‚ for that is the way of all
Premium Mammal Human Species
to the defendants and that if this is done then in his eyes‚ ’ justice will be accomplished without offering any encouragement for the disregard of law’. ii) Mercy may not be part of the law if it is followed to the letter of the law. iii) Is Mercy a prerogative of the executive? In this case yes – the Trial Judge and jury have held communications with the Chief Executive for guidance. 3. The nature of law
Free Political philosophy Social contract Law