Group decision making could be analysed as a very complex process whereby individual contributions play a big role in it. Wood et al. (2010) explained that group decision effectiveness equates to individual contributions add group process gains and deduct group process loss. We felt that the decisions made in groups contributed to a major part to mould the behaviour of individuals in future group activities. Hence‚ it is crucial to focus and analyse on the key factors that created effective group
Premium Critical thinking Decision making
opinions into a shared conclusion. In the movie “12 Angry Men”‚ juror number 8 (Henry Fonda) was not sure if evidence presented against a young defendant in court left reasonable doubt for a guilty conviction. The other jurors believed the presented facts and the defendant’s background warrants a guilty conviction. The movie showed how juror number 8 persuasively got the other jurors to review each fact logically‚ which led to an unanimous not guilty decision. Conger noted four essential steps use in
Premium Regulatory Focus Theory Persuasion Logic
In the film “12 Angry men” there is an extensive use of reason as a form of persuasion. The movie talks about how a Puerto Rican youth is on trial for murder‚ accused of knifing his father to death. Eleven of the jurors vote for conviction‚ each for reasons of his own.
Premium
TWELVE ANGRY MEN A three act play written by Reginald Rose’s. Twelve angry men is a dramatic story of a difficult jury just trying to reach a verdict. Most of the jury are thinking not guilty but the few jurors are hung on guilty with a few important pieces of evidence and clues it goes back and forth through the whole book. When the majority of the jury gets the few to change their mind the truth of being not guilty or guilty never is revealed. Act One explains the layout of twelve angry men. This
Premium Jury Not proven Crime
Talita E. Sigillo Final draft W.A.C Based on the movie «12 angry men» In the movie «12 angry men»‚ one can explore a variety of fallacies and generalizations. Each juror except for one comes in with a verdict of «Guilty»‚ but by using critical thinking the reasons to support their claim are dismissed one by one. Except for Juror number three who is the last one to change his verdict. He disregards all critical reasoning and sticks to his initial claim using multiple fallacies to support it
Premium Jury Not proven Law
Twelve men meet in one room to discuss whether an eighteen-year-old boy is responsible for his father’s death. An initial vote was cast‚ where eleven men voted guilty and one juror voted not guilty. Ultimately‚ the jury decided that he was not guilty after deliberations. The twelve-person jury must decide if the boy is guilty or is there reasonable doubt to believe that he is not guilty. The jury must vote on guilty or not guilty. If there are disagreements‚ the jury must debate until they reach
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
Market Place of Ideas comes into effect while analyzing the development of the jurors beliefs. The basis of this concept is that the truth will be revealed in the free release of ideas for the discernment of all‚ and this is exactly what occurred in 12 Angry Men. One man managed to convince the others one by one that the defendant was innocent‚ yet this would not have been possible if all of their ideas were not freely released. If the eighth juror were intimidated by the number of those who outnumbered
Premium Belief Stereotype Opinion
In 12 angry men there are many themes that are present one of the major themes that is found was present is‚ one determined and skilled individual can wield a lot of influence. Juror number eight is a “quiet‚ thoughtful‚ gentle man” he seesall points of the argument and wants to find the truth. On the other hand juror number three is “a very strong‚ very forceful‚ extremely opinionated man” his opinion is all that matters and if other people don’t agree with it they are automatically wrong. All
Premium Thought Jury Not proven
civil in a time such as the one the juror’s were going through. The twelve jurors all had different beliefs as to their verdict‚ different ideas and different behaviors. Having twelve men in a small‚ hot room for long periods of time is chaos in itself. There were different attitudes‚ some calm‚ mad‚ frustrated‚ angry‚ not caring. It was hard for all of them to remain calm and come to a verdict throughout the movie. An attitude as described in the book is “a favorable or unfavorable evaluative reaction
Premium Jury Not proven Critical thinking
Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose is a play about a jury consisting of twelve men trying to decide whether a boy accused of murder is guilty or innocent. Each juror has their own past experiences‚ each with their own influence. However‚ some jurors bring up their pasts during the case. That is because a man’s experiences have a profound effect on the way he thinks and acts. Beneficial or not‚ Jurors Three and Eleven’s pasts affect not only the way they act‚ but the way the rest of the jurors act
Premium Jury Not proven Court