"Groupthink challenger" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 5 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Explanation of the Problem The Challenger explosion which took place on January 28th‚ 1986 included several elements that contributed to the failure of the O-ring and subsequent explosion of the shuttle. The result was the death of 7 astronauts‚ the loss of the shuttle‚ and a 32-month halt of the space program while an investigation was conducted. The main cause of the problem seems to be that O-rings on the solid rocket boosters were not designed to work in the cold temperatures that was apparent

    Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Columbia Space Shuttle Challenger

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On January 28‚ 1986‚ at approximately 11:39a.m. the space shuttle challenger exploded in front of the whole world‚ whether you were sitting‚ standing‚ or listening‚ it was a tragedy that should have been and could have been easily prevented. It involved physically killing seven passengers aboard the space shuttle Challenger and mentally killing their families and close friends that were not aboard. If only NASA had just listen and Morton Thiokol stood by their engineers‚ then maybe those seven passengers

    Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Columbia Space Shuttle Challenger

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    delays‚ Challenger launched at 11:38 a.m. EST on Jan. 28‚ 1986” (Chow‚ 2011). The ship exploded 73 seconds after liftoff (Howell‚ 2012). The (mechanical) cause of the accident points to pressure seals (O-rings) but more importantly points to the serious problems that NASA had with its communication channels and safety information systems (Mahler & Casamayou‚ 2009‚ p. 40) Structural and Mechanical Factors As aforementioned in the paragraph above pressure rings are blamed for the Challenger incident

    Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Columbia Space Shuttle Challenger

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Tenth and Final Mission of the Challenger Space Shuttle” The Challenger Space Shuttle exploded seventy three seconds after liftoff. All the crew on board died on January 28‚ 1986‚ all of America was in shock. How and why did it happen. Roger Bogilay told NASA the the o’rings on the shuttle would not seal right in the extreme cold. NASA previously delayed the launch six times before liftoff. At liftoff black smoke came out of the right engine booster for two seconds due to the oring being burned

    Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Challenger Space Shuttle Columbia

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    disaster due to error in engineering design. The example we focus on was the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster in January 28‚ 1986. It was a disaster that really touch the public. Unfortunately‚ all the seven members of the crew including the teacher Sharon Christa McAuliffe died. She was the first civilian astronaut from the President Ronald Reagan project the TISP: Teacher In Space Program. The Space Shuttle Challenger was NASA’s second space shuttle orbiter to be put into service. The shuttle also called

    Premium NASA Space exploration Space Shuttle

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thesis Reading

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    symptoms of Groupthink that lead them to committing violations of school rules. The Groupthink phenomenon allowed the students of certain peer groups to have faulty decisions causing them to do wrong actions. The group also discussed the activities that peer groups mostly do and their self-evaluation of their school performance. With this‚ they have also included the number of people among their respondents who have encountered committing violations and their peers’ influence on this. The Groupthink phenomenon

    Premium Peer group Social psychology Sociological terms

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    evidence-based approach. New York‚ NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin. Taggerty‚ J. (2009 ‚ March 17). How do leaders prevent group think? . Retrieved from http://5starinnovation.com/how-do-leaders-prevent-group-think/ Callaway ‚ M. R. ‚ & Esser‚ J. K. . (1984). Groupthink: effects of cohesiveness and problem-solving procedures on group decision making. Social Behavior and Personality‚ 12(2)‚ 157-164.

    Premium Crowd psychology Investment Group decision making

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    NASA’s Challenger Tragedy January 28‚ 1986 was marked as one of the darkest day of NASA’s history when Space Shuttle Challenger exploded 73 seconds after liftoff killing all seven crew members. It was NASA’s 25th‚ mission but unfortunately not a successful one. Challenger’s disaster appeared in a period of small budgets‚ workforce and a need for the space agency to confirm its successfully shuttle program. Pressures settled because of the need to meet client obligations‚ which transformed

    Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Columbia Space Shuttle Challenger

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Team Decision Making

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    how to do when he or she is finished helping you‚ you will also have the skill because you were just shown. Teams can be a great thing but it can also be a difficult thing and can have its downsides. One pitfall of team decision making is groupthink. Groupthink occurs when team members place consensus above priority. Another pitfall is escalating of commitment. “Under some conditions‚ teams will persist with a losing course of action‚ even in the face of clear evidence to the contrary. This is known

    Premium The A-Team Team Member of Parliament

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Space Shuttle Challenger & Columbia Accidents Engineers have designed the world we live in. They are the ones that research what is safe and what is not‚ they are the ones that bring blue prints to life. However‚ this power can backfire on them. Engineers are expected to create products that are safe for everyone. The engineer affects many people ’s lives. A single fault can possibly result in the death of a person. A serious fault can lead to the deaths of several people. It is of paramount importance

    Premium Space Shuttle Columbia Kennedy Space Center NASA

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50