Grace Chavez Response to Twelve Angry Men 11-4-2013 Twelve Angry Men Twelve angry men is a movie which takes place in a New York jury chamber on one of the hottest days in the year during the deliberation faze. Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) is the only juror out of the twelve who believes that the case they are deciding on should not be open and shut he wants to talk and point out facts of the case. The twelve men in the case must decide on this young boy’s fate‚ who is on trial for the murder of
Premium Jury Court
Analysis of 12 Angry Men: a) Stage of group development: The 12 Angry Men provides good examples to demonstrate 4 stages of group dynamics. First stage of Group Dynamics is forming. In this stage‚ members don’t have clear idea and are not sure about their role and responsibilities. When 12 members of jury entered the room to vote‚ they were not clear about their roles. Some of them wanted to vote guilty‚ one person wanted to discuss while some were really not bothered and wanted to leave as soon
Premium Jury Logic Decision making
How does Rose use structural elements to strengthen his examination of the judicial system? Rose uses the structural elements of the play to further his position‚ critiquing the flaws of the judicial system. 12 Angry Men takes place in ’real time’‚ which allows for the play’s characters to further develop and creates a sense of realism. The characters of the play are representative of the play’s message‚ that decisions such as the one the jurors must make are important‚ and cannot be viewed with
Premium Abuse
To place multiple men in a room to decide the fate over a criminal can lead to many biases being expressed in means to back up one ’s opinion on the case. The personal predilections & biases made by some individuals who happen to be part of a jury can ultimately either place an innocent man in jail or let a guilty man run free. The Reginald Rose play Twelve Angry Men shows just how dangerous it is for jurors to bring their personal agendas to the table through the bigoted biases of Juror 10 and the
Free Jury Not proven Verdict
Sidney Lumet‚ director of 12 Angry Men‚ did a phenomenal job expressing the depiction of an adaptation of the theatre production. A 12- man jury are sent into a room to discuss the topics laid out in court‚ referring to a young‚ Puerto Rican‚ man supposedly killing his father. The defendant’s alibi is weak‚ and the murder weapon was found at the scene. Several witnesses have seen the defendant fleeing the scene. On this excruciating hot day‚ the men begin laying down the law‚ and looking at the evidence
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
Has bias ever influenced anything you have done? Have you ever been swayed by the way someone looks or by the color of their skin. In 12 Angry Men bias is everywhere‚ most of the characters have been influenced by bias one way or another. But by far juror 3‚ 10‚ and 7 are the most biased because they all can be mean‚ racist‚ and impatient. The first juror that is influenced by bias is juror number #3 by being mean. First he is mean in this book because on page 14 juror #3 says “ I never saw
Premium
bullying the other jurors when they think differently from him. With a teenage boy’s life in their hands‚ the jury has an important job of determining whether or not the defendant is guilty of murdering his father. Let’s learn more about Juror 3 in 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose. As soon as the jurors move to the deliberation room‚ Juror 3 begins throwing his influence on the weakest member of the jury‚ Juror 2. Juror 3 is annoyed that it has taken as long as it has‚ as to him‚ the boy is obviously guilty
Premium Family Jury Not proven
Olivia Albright Mrs. Thomson English 101 5- November- 2013 In the film 12 Angry Men‚ juror number eight‚ also known as Davis‚ showed exceptional moral behavior. Juror number eight may have been standing alone in his opinions‚ but he had no problem with that. He differs from the other jurors’ in many ways‚ from his physical appearance and background‚ to his views‚ to his actions and speech throughout the film. First of all‚ from the surface Davis was perceived to be an average looking guy; tall
Premium Verdict Jury Morality
From watching 12 Angry Men‚ it raises the question of what are the factors that influence the choices we make and the actions we take? 12 Angry Men was about a trial of an 18 year old boy who was accused murdering his father. He was accused of stabbing his father in the chest with a pocket knife. The judge commanded that the jury needs to come up with a decision as to whether or not the verdict (the boy) was guilty or not. If the jury pleaded guilty‚ the boy would face the death penalty. At first
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
1957 classic film‚ ’12 Angry Men’‚ the writer‚ Reginald Rose‚ portrays the antagonist‚ Juror #7‚ as a Christ figure. The writer’s use of a few conspicuous similarities made making the initial connection simple. However‚ the writer’s brilliant use of inconspicuous similarities made researching this paper very enjoyable. It amazes me that a writer takes the time to tuck little morsels of meaning just under the surface of his work. Let’s take a deeper look at ’12 Angry Men’. The film tells
Premium Jesus Gospel of Matthew Jury