"Habeas corpus" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 14 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bar Exams Question 2006 - 2010

    • 51428 Words
    • 206 Pages

    BAR EXAMINATION 2006 REMEDIAL LAW REMEDIAL LAW | - I - 1. What is the concept of remedial law? 2% 2. Distinguish between substantive law and remedial law. 2% 3. How are remedial laws implemented in our system of government? 2% 4. Distinguish jurisdiction from venue? 2% 5. What do you mean by (a) real actions; and (b) personal actions? 2% - II - What court has jurisdiction over an action for specific performance filed by a subdivision homeowner against a subdivision developer

    Premium Supreme Court of the United States Court Appeal

    • 51428 Words
    • 206 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paper 8- Abraham Lincoln and the Suspension of Habeas Corpus Founding father Benjamin Franklin famously said "Those who would give up Essential Liberty‚ to purchase a little temporary Safety‚ deserve neither Liberty nor Safety and will lose both." Civil Liberties are rights and freedoms that protect an individual from the state. Civil liberties set limits on the government so that its agents cannot abuse their power and interfere unduly with the lives of private citizens. In America‚ the founding

    Premium Abraham Lincoln President of the United States American Civil War

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Procedure

    • 70074 Words
    • 281 Pages

    CIVIL PROCEDURE Rules 1 – 71   I.      GENERAL PRINCIPLES   Concept of Remedial Law Remedial Law is that branch of law which prescribes the method of enforcing rights or obtaining redress for their invasion  Substantive Law as Distinguished from Remedial Law Substantive law creates‚ defines and regulates rights and duties regarding life‚ liberty or property which when violated gives rise to a cause of action (Bustos v. Lucero‚ 81 Phil. 640). Remedial law prescribes the methods of enforcing

    Premium Jurisdiction Court Appeal

    • 70074 Words
    • 281 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus Our country has certain laws protecting both civilians and prisoners. There is a law given the name Habeas Corpus which states that an accused must be brought before a judge and there must be sufficient evidence and reasoning of why the accused is being sent to jail. This allows the accused to defend their actions or prove the evidence being brought forth is false to keep from unjust imprisonment. Habeas Corpus has been followed since 1215 and recently was put on hold. Recently our

    Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States President of the United States

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is Habeas Corpus In our country we have certain law that protects both civilians as well as the prisoners. This law is called Habeas Corpus. This states that anyone that has been accused of anything must be brought in front of a judge with sufficient evidence or reason they are being sent to jail. Once this happens they are allowed to defend their actions and to prove their innocence as well as prove that the evidence that is being presented is false and unjust imprisonment. Habeas Corpus

    Premium George W. Bush United States President of the United States

    • 1263 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Interest Litigation

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Public Interest Litigation (PIL) PIL in broad terms means litigation filed in a court of law for the protection of “Public Interest” on the wide variety of subjects concerning citizens.   The history: Public Interest Litigation popularly known as PIL can be broadly defined as litigation in the interest of that nebulous entity: the public in general. Prior to 1980s‚ only the aggrieved party could personally knock the doors of justice and seek remedy for his grievance and any other person who

    Premium Civil procedure Supreme Court of the United States Court

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    IN the High court of Judicature at Allahabad. ************* supplementary Affidavit in Civil MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2013 (Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) (DISTRICT:mAU) Ram Bechan Singh on of late Ramanand Singh R/o New Colony Braham Sthan ‚Sahadatpura‚Mau ‚posted as karayakarta ‚Sri Gandhi Ashram ‚Khadi Gram Udyog‚ Bhandar ‚Ratanpura ‚ District-Mau ----- Petitioner

    Premium Habeas corpus Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi The Order

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury V. Madison

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Caption and Procedural History Marbury v. Madison‚ Supreme Court of the United States‚ 1803 Justice Marshall wrote the majority opinion; he was joined by Paterson‚ Chase‚ and Washington. Justice Cushing and Moore did not participate. This case was originally tried in the Supreme Court of the Unites States. Marbury requested the Supreme the Court issue a writ of mandamus to compel James Madison to deliver the commissions issued by former President John Adams. 2. Facts Just before finishing

    Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Marbury v. Madison

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I have lived in Corpus Christi my entire adolescence. Corpus Christi during that time has stayed the same; Operation Bay Front presented an opportunity for Corpus Christi to make a drastic change. Some of it would be positive‚ and some would be considered negative. My belief is that by approving Operation Bay Front Corpus Christi would take a huge leap forward‚ financially and economically.             The great features Destination Bay front has to offer is the Great Lawn/Festival area‚ Sherrill

    Premium

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury V. Madison

    • 18680 Words
    • 75 Pages

    Westlaw Delivery Summary Report for 4‚IP Date/Time of Request: Client Identifier: Database: Citation Text: Lines: Documents: Images: Saturday‚ December 29‚ 2012 23:27 Central IP USER SCTFIND 1 Cranch 137 1641 1 0 The material accompanying this summary is subject to copyright. Usage is governed by contract with Thomson Reuters‚ West and their affiliates. FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY 1 Cranch 137‚ 5 U.S. 137‚ 1803 WL 893 (U.S.Dist.Col.)‚ 2 L.Ed. 60 (Cite as: 1 Cranch 137‚ 5 U.S. 137 (U.S.Dist.Col

    Premium Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus United States

    • 18680 Words
    • 75 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 50