The exclusionary rule is a term used to refer to the legal principle in the United Sates‚ which holds that evidence analyzed and collected in violation of a person’s constitutional rights. It is sometimes admissible for the persecution of criminal in the court of law. To protect the constitutional rights‚ an exclusionary rule might be considered as an example of a prophylactic rule which is created by the Judiciary. In most cases‚ it is used to protect the constitutional rights of a person such
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Discussion Questions Answer the following in complete sentences. 1. Explain the exclusionary rule and how it applies to civil liberties. The exclusionary rule is a judicial rule that use of evidence which is obtained in violation of the law is unacceptable. This often refers the rights of courts where they are able to exclude such materials that violated the Fourth Amendment. Since civil liberties are rights that individual has to be against the unjust governmental actions‚ the government does not
Premium United States Constitution Law Exclusionary rule
"exclusionary rule" until they know what is stated in the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule go hand in hand. The Fourth Amendment was put into the constitution to limit on the actions of overzealous officers (Peak‚ 2006). Then‚ one must understand what is meant by "probable cause." Armed with this information‚ we can discuss the definition of the exclusionary rule and some of its history. Also‚ we will list some of the advantages and disadvantages of the exclusionary rule and
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Exclusionary rule
Should the Exclusionary Rule be Abolished? John Doe University of Phoenix Criminal Procedure CJA350 Mr. Instructor Feb 07‚ 2006 Should the Exclusionary Rule be Abolished? Does the exclusionary rule protect the guilty? For years people have argued if the exclusionary rule is significantly helping the rather obvious criminal. By abolishing the exclusionary rule some people fear the whole purpose of the fourth amendment would be violated by using evidence attained illegally. If the proper
Premium Police Exclusionary rule United States Constitution
“Comparison between Ernest Van den Haag’s and Rand Richards Cooper’s Articles.’’ It is a very delicate issue to talk about physician-assisted suicide. There are two authors that have very interesting things to say about this topic: Ernest Van den Haag with his essay “Make Mine Hemlock”‚ and Rand Richards Cooper who wrote “The Dignity of Helplessness: What Sort of Society Would Euthanasia Create?” They have very interesting‚ and valid reasons to believe that their point of view should prevail
Premium Suffering Suicide Ernest van den Haag
Should the exclusionary rule be abolished? My answer to that is no. The exclusionary rule is one of the fundamental ways the rights of the all people are protected. Mainly the rule is to protect you from police power. If the exclusionary rule was abolished you will more than likely see police brutality on the rise. Officer’s‚ Detectives‚ etc will cut corners and otherwise ignore the basic rights of the people they serve. If the rule was abolished we will see sometimes innocent people put in
Premium United States Constitution Law Exclusionary rule
The Exclusionary Rule was put in place to prevent the government from using evidence that was gathered illegally in violation of the United States Constitution. Evidence that was obtained from an unreasonable search and seizure that violates the Fourth Amendment or Fifth Amendment are found admissible in court under the Exclusionary Rule‚ if no exceptions apply. The establishment of the Exclusionary Rule was due to the rulings of several Supreme Court cases where it was found unconstitutional for
Premium Exclusionary rule Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Ashley Polston ACP Comp P3 November 18‚ 2014 Justified or Not In the film Cider House Rules‚ rule breaking and deceit are somewhat justifiable acts that the characters use out of selfishness. Homer Wells is an orphan that grew up in an orphanage in Maine in the 1940s. The orphanage was directed by a man named Dr. Wilbur Larch. As Wells grew‚ Larch took the initiative to take him under his wing and teach him to be an unlicensed‚ skilled doctor. One ordinary day‚ Candy Kendall and Wally Worthington
Premium The Cider House Rules Doctor Narcissism
Sumptuous set design‚ painstaking cinematography and thoughtful‚ understated performances make ‘Girl With A Pearl Earring’ an aesthetic masterpiece – but dear God is it dull. It’s based on the best-selling novel by Tracy Chevalier but‚ more significantly than that‚ the book itself tells the story behind a painting by brush-brandishing Dutchman Johannes Vermeer. And not a very interesting story either‚ it has to be said. Rent-a-thesp Colin Firth plays Vermeer‚ who takes a break from the clogs‚ windmills
Premium Johannes Vermeer Painting Fiction
an important rule called the parol evidence rule exists. This rule states that if the contract is entirely in writing‚ no other evidence which would add to‚ alter or contradict the contract is accepted. This essay will deal with analyzing the application of parol evidence rule and whether Australian courts should or should not provide remedies for breach of contract where the promise concerned was not included in the written contract. The rationale of the parol evidence rule is that the existence
Premium Contract law Contract Parol evidence rule