Assignment: Law of Evidence Question 1 The law of evidence aims to determine what material may be presented in court as evidence‚ by whom‚ in what manner and its probative value. Question 2 The onus of proof lies with the State to prove that the accused is guilty. Question 3 Real evidence is evidence in the form of objects or exhibits such as the murder weapon. Documentary evidence is evidence in the form of written documentary such as letters and contracts. Question 4 Evidential
Premium Jennifer Hudson Murder Jury
Court Observation October 30‚ 2012 On September 27th I went to Branch 6 to watch the criminal trial of the defendant Lord Wilson. It was making out to be a weeklong trial and I made it on the second to last day. All I knew was that it was a case involving drugs and had been in the making for a while. When I arrived at the public safety building to listen to the criminal trial taking place I learned firsthand that things never seem to stay on schedule. A recess was taking place when I walked
Premium Jury Prosecutor Court
The People of the State of Michigan vs. Mateos Trial 18th Judicial Circuit Court‚ Bay City‚ MI Presiding Judge: The Honorable Harry Gill November 19‚ 2013 @ 9:12 a.m. Submitted by November 20‚ 2013 I met outside of 18th Judicial Circuit Court at approximately 7:55 a.m. on November 19‚ 2013. The trial that we watched was supposed to start at 8:30; we got there a little early to be safe. The trial did not end up starting until 9:16 because some of the
Premium Jury
A. Interrogations‚ Confessions‚ and Non-testimonial Evidence 1. The Exclusionary Rule: The principle based on federal Constitutional Law that evidence illegally seized by law enforcement officers in violation of a suspect’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be used against the suspect in a criminal prosecution. The exclusionary rule is designed to exclude evidence obtained in violation of a criminal defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment protects
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Introduction1 2. Description of Digital Evidence2 3. Principles of Cyber Forensics3 4. Examination of Digital Evidence4 4.1 Preserving the evidence5 4.2 Locating the evidence6 4.3 Selecting the evidence 7 4.4 Analysing the evidence 8 4.5 Validating the evidence 9 4.6 Presenting the evidence 12 5. The Importance of Crime Reconstruction Hypotheses and Alternate Hypotheses 14 6. Conclusion 15 References 16 1. Introduction With the rapid development
Free Forensic science Computer forensics
Mines Commission‚ testimonies of mine workers of all different ages are shared and they demonstrate further detail into some of the costs that are paid for as a result of the development of mine labor progressed. As illustrated in the article‚ many of the mine owners during the Industrial Revolution were comfortable with justifying their manipulation of workers‚ specifically children‚ so long as they could reap benefits from doing so. The utilization of personal testimonies within this particular
Premium
secondary evidence was tendered and admitted. An objection was taken to its admission; Held: That such evidence was properly admitted and that the provision in the relevant statute “that no statement made by any person in answer to any question put by the Commission shall‚ except in cases of indictment for perjury committed in such answers‚ be admissible in evidence in any proceedings‚ civil or criminal” was not applicable‚ and did not prevent the admissibility of such evidence. In the
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Law
According to the Evidence Act Cap 6‚ evidence denotes the means by which any alleged matter or facts the truth of which is submitted to investigations‚ approved or disapproved‚ admissions‚ presumption of law and observations by courts in the judicial capacity as per section 2[1]d of the act. Rules of evidence refer to the procedure of admitting relevant facts by courts of law and in general they are referred to as Relevancy and Admissibility of Evidence According to section 4‚ it may be given from
Premium FACT Appeal Evidence law
What is the difference between direct and circumstantial evidence? Give two practical examples of each. Direct evidence proves a fact without interference and does not require any reasoning to arrive at the conclusion to be drawn from the evidence. Basically it can prove a fact by itself. Everything a witness saw‚ heard‚ found‚ etc. are examples of direct evidence. -A customer was present when they robbed the supermarket‚ he witnessed the event. -A person saw through the window when the criminal
Premium Crime Criminal law Murder
In crime scene investigations there is a lot of evidence that is valuable. That is including hair that is found at a crime scene. However‚ hair may not be seen as valuable evidence‚ but it is. Hair can tell you things that other evidence cannot. It can give you information about the unknown perpetrator and narrow your list of suspects. Hair is the most common type of trace evidence. Hair is easily transferred and resilient. Therefore‚ making it the most probable to be found at a crime scene
Premium Crime Police Criminal justice