What was the legal issue in this case? The legal issue in the case of Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County involved acts of ill will‚ which could have been avoided. While employed as a detention officer at the Dona Ana County Detention Center‚ Joseph Herrera was accused of unsuitable sexual behavior with female prison inmates and of exchanging favors for sex acts. One of the reasons that the Mesilla Valley Hospital (MVH) had hired Herrera is because of the favorable recommendations
Premium Employment Human sexual behavior Sexual intercourse
Catalina Balais Mabanag) to consummate the sale of a parcel of land with its improvements located along Roosevelt Avenue in Quezon City entered into by the parties sometime in January 1985 for the price of P1‚240‚000.00.The undisputed facts of the case were summarized by respondent court in this wise:On January 19‚ 1985‚ defendants-appellants Romulo Coronel‚ et. al. (hereinafter referred to as Coronels) executed a document entitled “Receipt of Down Payment” (Exh. “A”) in favor of plaintiff Ramona
Premium Contract Property Legal terms
SUIT TO INTERNATIONAL CATHOLIC MIGRATION COMMISSION (ICMC); THUS‚ BOTH THE LABOR ARBITER AND THE NLRC HAD NO JURISDICTION OVER THE CASE. — The basic issue in this case is whether the Memorandum of Agreement executed on July 15‚ 1988 gave ICMC immunity from suit. The Court holds it did. Consequently‚ both the Labor Arbiter and the NLRC had no jurisdiction over the case. Petitioner’s contention that the Memorandum of Agreement is not an act of Congress which is needed to "repeal or supersede" the provision
Premium United Nations Jurisdiction Government
international human rights treaties. Today‚ more than 400 people convicted of capital offences are held on Death Row and a newly constructed ‘Lethal Injection Chamber’ stands ready adjacent to the National Penitentiary at Muntinlupa. With an average of up to twelve people being sentenced to death every month the Philippines‚ in less than four years‚ has gone from an abolitionist position to having one of the highest sentencing rates in the world. The Supreme Court has begun its review of these sentences and
Free Capital punishment Human rights Crime
there is some interest in using these tools. However‚ still these have remained as ‘black box’ where managers blindly use the packages handed over to them by experts in mathematics‚ statistics and IT. There is a need for managers to develop clear understanding about these tools. The subject is proposed to be covered in four phases viz. developing conceptual knowledge‚ using the tools to simple problems with hand calculations‚ using computer to solve complex problems‚ and discussing few cases. MS Excel
Premium Problem solving Operations research Linear programming
Jefferson V.S Hamilton Debate Question • How did Jefferson’s ideals of government differ from those of Hamilton? Jefferson believed in strong states which would in return better control the government while also benefiting us while Hamilton believed in strong central government where the states would have limited power and the elite would have a say in government while also basing the economy on industry and large national debt. • Why was Jefferson’s support focused mainly on the “common” man
Premium Thomas Jefferson United States Political philosophy
Court Case Project Dredd Scott v. Sandford 1857 In the Dred Scott case‚ Scott filed for a lawsuit to gain freedom for him and his family. He was once obtained a slave in a slave state‚ but his master had moved around and ended up in Illinois‚ which had been a free state in 1836. His rights that were being withheld from him were freedom. The way they pleaded their case was that he lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he can’t be enslaved again. Scott lost the case‚ Taney
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
CA-G.R. SP No. 117361‚ which dismissed the petition filed by 3rd Alert Security and Detective Services‚ Inc. (3rd Alert). The Antecedent Facts This case started from an illegal dismissal complaint filed by Romualdo Navia against 3rd Alert. On November 30‚ 2005‚ the labor arbiter issued a decision that Navia’s dismissal was illegal. 3rd Alert appealed to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) which affirmed the ruling of the labor arbiter. 3rd Alert’s motion for reconsideration of the NLRC
Premium Appeal Employment Supreme Court of the United States
Case O: “Cultural Competency at Marion County Health Center” Marion County Health Center (MCHC) is a non-for-profit organization that provides woman health services at its Women’s health clinic. The Clinic provides services to a diverse population of 60% whites‚ 30% African-American‚ and 10% mix of various races. Breast screening rates at the Clinic was lower the required standards‚ and significantly lower for non-white patients. The lower rate and disparity in services conflicts with the mission
Premium
their job responsibilities are and how to coordinate all those responsibilities with a diverse group of people. The organization had clearly defined efforts on who was responsible for what particular job‚ but the real issue came as a result from "when the "what" gets done and how (Bolman & Deal‚ 2013‚ pg. 49). In relation to the problem with integration‚ complications with vertical and lateral integration were also a concern. A majority of these dilemmas stemmed from the upper hierarchy at the
Premium Decision making Management Decision theory