Constitution better embodied the American commitment to democracy (republicanism)‚ or whether it produced a greater compromise to it‚ one must define the nature of a republican government. Both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist set forth their distinctive views on the quality of representational government‚ but it was James Madison and Alexander Hamilton vision I feel was the most correct. By accepting their view‚ it is clear that they propose the best arguments for why the Constitution establishes a greater
Free United States Constitution Separation of powers Federalism
Constitutional Characterizations of Federalists and Democratic Republicans Throughout time‚ in reference to the constitution‚ Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans have been stereotyped as strict constructionists‚ while Federalists as lose interpreters. The true test of these assumptions is revealed throughout the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison‚ two leading figures of these two political parties. Although Jefferson advocated strict interpretation of the Constitution in his speech his
Free Thomas Jefferson United States Democratic-Republican Party
Research Paper: Jefferson vs. Hamilton Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two very influential people with very different ideals. With land inherited from his father‚ Jefferson set himself up as a Virginia tobacco farmer. Once established as a planter‚ Jefferson entered Virginia politics. As a politician‚ he did not have the ability to make rousing speeches. Instead‚ Jefferson spoke eloquently through his writing. His words in the Declaration of Independence and other writings are still
Free Thomas Jefferson Alexander Hamilton United States
the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists‚ those who supported ratification‚ and Anti-Federalists‚ those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to be
Premium United States Constitution United States Federalist Papers
In Alexander Hamilton’s writing‚ “The Federalists Papers No. 68‚” Hamilton argues that the president should be democratically chosen through representatives of each state. Each state should have the same amount of votes as they have senators and representatives. The delegates should be able to decide between candidates and know their qualifications for the job. The delegates should meet in their state and tell the national government what their decision is. In order for the candidate to be elected
Premium President of the United States Elections Election
between two opposing political philosophies during the late 1700’s. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist parties aroused at the formation and ratification of the Constitution. Both sides pointed out many arguments in order to find common ground in a governmental structure. The main conflict between the two parties revolved around the amount of power and control that the states and national government would obtain. As I am on the Federalist side‚ I support and agree to ratify the Constitution. For this will
Premium United States Constitution United States Articles of Confederation
from the Jeffersonians Fear from the Spanish 1795 - Pinckey’s Treaty Gives us access to the Mississippi River George Washington • Farewell Address Avoid long-term permanent alliances Be aware of political parties Leaves and goes back home Dies in 1799 Election of 1796 • John Adams - federalist • Thomas Jefferson - democratic republican • John Adams wins the Presidency and takes the Oath to Office in March Hamilton runs a group called “The High Federalists” (war
Free Thomas Jefferson John Adams James Madison
Federalists v. Anti-Federalists Participants in the Debate The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side‚ the supporters of the Constitution‚ or "Federalists‚" argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order‚ stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution‚ or "Antifederalists
Premium United States Constitution United States Congress President of the United States
The Federalists and the Anti Federalists went together like fire and ice. They always seemed to crash heads when it came to who should take power. The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves Federalists. They wanted a strong centered government. Unlike the Anti federalists‚ they were a diverse coalition of people who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Although less well organized than the Federalists‚ they also had an impressive group of leaders who were especially prominent
Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States
Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist 6 argues that countries who do not unite overall are bound to fail. The weak central government that was currently established could not prosper or even survive according to him. He wrote that “A man must be far gone in Utopian speculations who can seriously doubt that‚ if these States should either be wholly disunited‚ or only united in partial confederacies‚ the subdivisions into which they might be thrown would have frequent and violent contests with each other”
Premium Alexander Hamilton George Washington John Jay