planes page 4 Ticket revenue page 4 Operating Cost page 5 Deprecation page 5 Operating cash flows page 5 NPV page 5 5. Evaluation page 6-7 6. Appendix Introduction Fly-by-night Airlines is a major commercial air carrier offering passenger service between most large cities
Premium Net present value Depreciation Supply and demand
of value12.4%334‚441‚139Total$32‚848‚589$9‚366‚578$18‚403‚643$22‚168‚806$361‚466‚995And the NPV of the acquisition is: NPV = –$400‚000‚000 + 32‚848‚589 + 9‚366‚578 + 18‚403‚643 + 22‚168‚806 + 361‚466‚995 NPV = $44‚254‚610.07 CHAPTER 25 C-83 C-84 CASE SOLUTIONS 2. Since the acquisition is a positive NPV project‚ the most Birdie would offer is to increase the currentcash offer by the current NPV‚ or:Highest offer = $550‚000‚000 + 44‚254‚610.07Highest offer = $594‚254‚610.07The highest share
Premium Net present value Cash flow statement Cash flow
differ from multinational capital budgeting? How do incremental cash flows differ from total project cash flows? What is the difference between foreign project cash flows and parent cash flows? How does APV analysis differ from NPV analysis? How is the capital budgeting analysis adjusted for the additional economic and political risks? What is real option analysis? Complexities of Capital Budgeting for a Foreign Project Several factors make budgeting for a foreign project
Premium Net present value Investment Corporate finance
and have chances of running into bankruptcy. 2. Compute Capital Budgeting Decision Criteria. Discuss what they mean NPV: Cost of the current sourcing method has a NPV of $-32.67M over a period of 6 years(2004-2009). Cost of the In-house manufacturing method has a NPV of $-31.8M over a period of 6 years (2004-2009). This means taking this project has a positive NPV of $870‚000. According to this analysis‚ manufacturing in-house will work out to be cheaper. IRR: 37.9%‚ having such a high
Premium Net present value Finance Cost
NORTHERN DRILLING INC. THE MOND NICKEL CONTRACT DECISION – A TACTIVAL DILEMMA IN A GROWTH STRATEGY THE PROBLEM Peter Bremner‚ general manager for Northern Drilling Inc. (Northern) was looking over the RFP for an upcoming exploration contract for one of Canada’s largest mining companies‚ Mond Nickel Company (Mond). The RFP consisted of 2 projects‚ a Deep/Complex job (3‚000m holes) and an Intermediate/Routine job (1‚800m holes). The proposal was due in 3 weeks and Peter had to make a decision whether
Premium Net present value Investment Rate of return
and the assessment of the likelihood of project success (d) the measurement and interpretation of project value at risk Establish the potential economic return using IRR and modified IRR & advise on a projects return margin. Discuss merits of NPV & IRR. Discounted cash flow techniques are also extensively examined in the context of business valuations (business valuations are covered in chapters 9-12). Slow Fashions - 20 marks‚ June 09 Your business - 28 marks‚ June 09 Seal
Premium Net present value
variables regarding the investment and the spreadsheet automatically analyzes its attractiveness. Three traditional investment appraisal methods are used by the IAT. They include: • Pay-back Period • Internal Rate of Return (IRR) • NPV Included in the IAT are two spreadsheets with slightly different functionality. They are named: 1). Automated 2). Manual The main difference between these two worksheets lies in the way each creates future cash flows. The Automated
Premium Net present value Discounted cash flow Internal rate of return
how should management deal with issues such as: a) Test-market expenses? b) Overhead expenses? c) Erosion of Jell-O contribution margin? d) Allocation of charges for the use of excess agglomerator capacity? Typically‚ when using Net Present Value (NPV) method to determine whether a project adds value to the organization‚ free cash flow is taken into consideration. Depreciation expense‚ a non-cash item‚ is to be added back to the operating profit after tax to give operating cash flow. Other expenses
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow
including overrun of 10% so 9‚000‚000 open mine and over run 100000 Project B) 8300000 -(8300000*10%)= 7470000 1. Is this project financially feasible given the base scenario? Why or why not. Be sure to include a discussion of NPV and IRR. How does the lifetime income compare to the initial investment? 5 points 2. What are at least three risk factors that Heru should be considering in evaluating the project? What types of risk do they represent? 5 points 3. Is there
Premium Investment Net present value Cash flow
considered due to the loss of building and agglomerator use to the Jell-O project. Estimated sales figures were provided and not altered in our study as the figures are the sole pricing information given. We did not include Test-Market Expenses in our NPV calculation due to the fact that we treated them as sunk costs; costs that were already incurred and irretrievable. "Test market volume was packaged on an existing line‚ inadequate to handle the long run requirements." Since this is the only mention
Premium Net present value