In Michael Norton’s Tedx talk “ Money Can Buy You Happiness”‚ Norton suggests that money cam make us happy if we spend it on others. He explores that money often makes us feel very selfish and we do things only for ourself. Thus‚ happiness is not determinded by how much one earns or how much one spends on himself‚ but how he spends money on others‚ no matter how much or how it is spent : “ People who spent money on other people got happier; nothing happened to people who spent money on themselves”-
Premium Happiness Personal life Positive psychology
Some people believe that happiness is related to economic success because only money can make people’s life more enjoyable. When it comes to economic success‚ the majority of people believe that money means a luxurious life. To begin with‚ if someone owns great success on economic‚ that means he can spend more money on whatever he likes and spend more time on his hobbies. Emotionally‚ money can buy happiness at least to some extent. That is to say‚ you can buy things that you like in order to fulfill
Premium Happiness Personal life Positive psychology
After having read all the quotes‚ this Herzl’s quote was the one that stuck with me the most and is the one I can relate to the most. In my opinion in order for all other aspects of one’s life to function normally‚ one must first be himself/herself. It is of the utmost importance to know yourself fully so that your lovelife‚ your familylife‚ your friendships as well as your work wouldn’t have to suffer. If you are satisfied with yourself everything else will come together‚ just like a huge jigsaw
Premium Love Self-esteem Friendship
Democritus and Epicurus Philosophy 116 October 17‚ 1996 In the Atomists‚ we see pluralism taken as far as it could possibly go. We see Democritus and Epicurus divide all the world‚ as well as the universe‚ into two categories; atoms and empty space. Everything else is merely thought to exist. The atoms are eternal‚ infinite in size and number and they are moving through the empty space. There is no motion without empty space. Both Democritus and Epicurus agreed that motion
Premium Democritus Sense Sensory system
student of Socrates has many works and Western influence on death and dying. Western views on the soul living after death is developed from Plato’s ancient beliefs. Plato philosophized that the human soul is immortal‚ and that we shouldn’t fear death. Epicurus‚ another ancient Greek philosopher argued that death is the end of the body and soul‚ and therefore should not be feared. These two philosophers have contrasting views on what happens after death‚ but both have similar views on how death shouldn’t
Premium Plato Socrates Philosophy
friends” in which I acknowledge. Epicurus assured people tended to live a life feared of death bringing them anxiety in which lead him to quote that “death is the end of both the body and the soul and therefore should not be feared.” Epicurus seemed to be a more positive and confident person facing his life‚ which may have helped many others to calm down and not be afraid. To all those who were afraid of misbehaving to God’s commandments and going to hell‚ Epicurus taught them that God was not there
Premium Good and evil God Theodicy
the best God can do‚ then I am not impressed by this God. The presence of evil on this planet is the main problem to this definition of God. The earliest statement of this problem of evil was stated by the Greek philosopher Epicurus and is called the Epicurean Paradox. Epicurus states that if a God is good and willing to get rid of evil from the face of this Earth but is still not able to do this simple task‚ then he is not omnipotent. If he is able‚ but is not willing to do that‚ then he is malevolent
Premium God Good and evil Problem of evil
Nagel and Epicurus have conflicting views on whether to fear death or not. Although Nagel and Epicurus agree that life is good they have three main arguments in which their view upon death differs which are: “what you don’t know can’t hurt you”‚ “who suffers?” and asymmetry”. This paper will focus on those three reasons and explain both philosopher’s views. The first argument the philosopher’s opinion contrast in is “what you don’t know can’t hurt you”. Epicurus believes in egotistic hedonism which
Premium
unacceptable. Epicurus and Aristotle are both major philosophers who share their theories and views. Today being pro life is seen as conservative or a Christian way of thinking. Epicurus and Aristotle say happiness is an ultimate end goal. Every body has a soul purpose or a physical purpose that both philosophers discuss. Pleasure was and still is a controversial topic‚ that both Epicurus and Aristotle discuss. Both philosophers show views of being supportive of pro life and pro choice. Epicurus’ time line
Premium Abortion Human rights Pregnancy
BOOK3) Eulogy on Epicurus: “You are my father and the discoverer of truth… I feed on each golden saying. Plainly visible are the gods in their majesty and their calm realms… All the needs of the gods are sullied by nature‚ and nothing at any time detracts from their peace of mind. Says we must banish fear of death. Men are driven to seek wealth in part because of a fear of death. Mind and soul are intimately connected‚ form single substance. Mind/intelligence is fixed in middle of breast‚ rest
Premium Greek mythology God Epic poetry