This report is based upon the information from the Harvard business case: “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century”. Both Coca Cola Company and PepsiCo are the largest players in the Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSD) industry. The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied‚ in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted
Premium Coca-Cola Marketing Pepsi
9-706-447 REV: APRIL 16‚ 2009 DAVID B. YOFFIE Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 For more than a century‚ Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola vied for “throat share” of the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles in the so-called cola wars were fought over the $66 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry in the United States.1 In a “carefully waged competitive struggle” that lasted from 1975 through the mid-1990s‚ both Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual revenue growth of around
Premium Coca-Cola
|Harvard Business Review. Managing Differences. |October 21 | |Pankaj Ghemawat March 2007 p.59-68 |2010 | |Jelmer Steenbeek – 1986902 Simon van Gijssel – 1767852 |Introduction International Business | |Beugelsdijk S
Free Globalization Management Business
Business Opportunity Analysis [Airborne Express] Seoeui Hong 1316692 1. Identify the key buyers‚ products and geographies that Airborne Express‚ FedEx‚ and UPS try to serve. Are they similar or different? Airborne Express Federal Express UPS Product Line Air-express transportation + provides delivery service of small packages and documents FedEx Ground delivery (No shipment) (Business documents‚ electronic components‚ medical samples and replacement parts) Ground delivery
Premium United Parcel Service Express mail Logistics
The Governance Structure of International Joint Ventures Property Rights and Transaction Cost Explanations Sonja Horvath (Remetic) Doctorate candidate Center for Business Studies University of Vienna Brünner Str. 72 A-1210 Vienna‚ Austria Sonja.Remetic@gmail.com November‚ 2011 Abstract This paper explores the determinants of ownership and residual decision rights in international joint ventures (IJVs) by developing a theoretical framework based on the property right and transaction
Premium Joint venture
HBR: “Introducing New Coke Case”: Discussion Questions: Directions: You are to write a report on the HBR Coke Case. The report consists of 10 questions. Each question is worth 10 points. Please write in a Q & A format and not essay. Questions: 1. What is the case about? Write a ½ page executive summary of the case which includes at least 3 consumer behavior theories that are evident in this case. Ans: In the late 80s‚ Pepsi market share was catching up with Coca-cola at
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
Starbucks We take Coffee seriously! Starbucks Problem Statement • Is this best possible way to grow? • How much to extend in the quest for growth? • How do tap / react the opportunities? About Starbucks • Speciality coffee company – Arabica beans • CEO – Howard Schultz • 1000 retail locations in 32 markets throughout North America and 2 stores in Tokyo About Starbucks Channels • Retail Outlets – Bread and Butter – An experience store (Third Place) – Contribution to revenue: 86% –
Premium Retailing Starbucks Supply chain management
Blockbuster became the dominant movie rental firm for a number of reasons. First and foremost in the early years‚ they were invested in by Wayne Huizeinga who infused the company with $18.5 million dollars and for a span of 7 years grew the company’s market capitalization at an annual growth rate of 118%. Once it started becoming large‚ it efficiently used economies of scale. It also had the most power to negotiate favorable deals with movie studios as opposed to mom and pop shops. Blockbuster
Premium Renting Blu-ray Disc
CASE STUDY ‚ Au Bon Pain This is a company which has achieved great success and soon had become the leader on the market. If we could describe them by only one word that word would be: Quality. Very quickly they became recognizable. Despite that they gained a lot of competition in the market they were still trying to develop. The company began to develop so quickly that they had to make some changes. They stopped and focused their attention on the structure of the company‚ the company inside.
Premium Facebook Mission statement
As stated on Page 13 of the case‚ Bunge has several options in how to participate in the biofuels market. First‚ they could be more active in sugarcane-based ethanol. Advantages to the company include: a large amount of land in Brazil for the growth of sugarcane as well as relatively cheap labor; however‚ there is a substantial investment of $200 million. Second‚ they could produce more palm oil in Asia‚ which also requires significant investment in production facilities. Both methods result
Premium Biofuel Cellulose Corporation