Human Resources at the AES Corporation: The Case of the Missing Department discuss the effectiveness of AES’ approach to HRM‚ and make recommendations for the future. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 4 ADVANTAGES OF AES’ APPROACH 5 CONCERNS 6 RISKS GOING FORWARD 7 RECOMMENDATIONS 8 CONCLUSION 9 APPENDIX 10 BIBLIOGRAPHY 11 INTRODUCTION AES’ annual results speak for themselves‚ financial data available‚ from 1991 to 1996 shows that
Premium Strategic management
Strategy AES distinguishes itself through developing new products and applications at a low cost. It is committed to social responsibility and empowering its employees through its four main principles which include integrity‚ fairness‚ social responsibility and fun. It is "different" from other corporations because AES is focused on retaining its core values and culture as the corporation expands in size. The company ’s sources of sustainable competitive advantage include technical leadership
Premium Human resources Human resource management
GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS STANFORD UNIVERSITY S HR-3 FEBRUARY 1997 HUMAN RESOURCES AT THE AES CORPORATION: THE CASE OF THE MISSING DEPARTMENT Dennis Bakke‚ the CEO of AES‚ a company that develops‚ builds and operates electric power plants‚ sat in his office late in 1996 and thought about the question that was perennially posed to him: could AES‚ soon to have some 25‚000 people located literally all over the world following a recent purchase of power plants in Kazakhstan‚ continue to operate
Premium
1. How would you evaluate the capital budgeting method used historically by AES? What’s good and bad about it? Historically‚ the AES capital budgeting method primarily used the following assumptions: • All nonrecourse debt was regarded as good • Dividend cash flow were considered equally risky • Project was evaluated by the equity discount rate for the dividends from the project • A 12% discount rate was applied to all projects. The historical method is quite simplistic
Premium Finance Investment Balance sheet
probabilities in terms of real events? If AES adopts this type of budgeting model‚ it will be unlikely for the management as well as shareholders to pursue the project with high risks in developing countries‚ such as the one in Pakistan. According to the chart in the answer of Question NO.2‚ we can clearly observe that all of the developing countries have very high WACCs. In other words‚ given the high discount rates and associated risks‚ it is very possible for AES to do its business in the country with
Premium Investment Finance Risk
Sunday‚ March 15‚ 2009 COST OF CAPITAL AT AES Evaluating the Historical Capital Budgeting Method Currently AES employs Project Finance Framework. Project finance tends to be used in projects with tangible assets with predictable cash flows in which construction and operating targets can be easily established through explicit contract. The key to AES projects financing lies with the precise forecasting of cash flows. In effect‚ the possibility of estimating cash flows with an acceptable
Premium Finance Weighted average cost of capital Debt
where performance is really an issue‚ symmetrical encryption is most often used. AES is a symmetrical encryption standard. The Advanced Encryption Standard‚ or AES is a specification for the encryption of electronic data established by the U.S. National Institute of standards and technology in 2001. It is based on the Rijndael cipher‚ and was developed by two Belgian cryptographers‚ Joan Daemen and Vincent Rijmen . AES is based in a design principlae known as a substitution-permutation network‚ and
Premium Cipher Cryptography
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Most of lecture slides by Lawrie Brown Origins clear a replacement for DES was needed have theoretical attacks that can break it have demonstrated exhaustive key search attacks can use Triple-DES – but slow‚ has small blocks US NIST issued call for ciphers in 1997 15 candidates accepted in Jun 98 5 were shortlisted in Aug-99 Rijndael was selected as the AES in Oct-2000 issued as FIPS PUB 197 standard in Nov-2001 AES Requirements private key symmetric
Premium Cipher
#1. AES’ organizational structure can best be classified as a non-bureaucratic‚ flat organization structure with the key goal of empowerment of individuals to run their respective areas for the common good of the whole organization. The honeycomb design described in the case evidences a variety of pods or families with a team leader where each family of 10 to 20 individuals work on specific functions in a plant. For example‚ beneath the plant manager you have a number of functions such as the
Premium
Case 3: Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES Question 1 Explain and comment on the capital budgeting method used historically by AES. Is there a need for change? Explain. Question 2 If Venerus implements the suggested methodology‚ what will be the adjusted discount rate for the Red Oak project (USA) and the Lal Plr project (Pakistan)? Question 3 Calculate the effect that a revision of its cost of capital will have on the Lal Plr project’s NPV. Comment on the
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Net present value