casenotes represent a range of approaches to last year’s case. The Journal cannot speak to how these casenotes were scored by any other law journal. WARNING: These casenotes may contain errors. They have not been checked for conformity to the Bluebook‚ and DLJ does not vouch for the formatting of the citations.
Premium United States Jury Appeal
Justices deny review over students’ religious messages in classroom By Bill Mears‚ CNN Supreme Court Producer updated 3:41 PM EDT‚ Mon June 11‚ 2012 STORY HIGHLIGHTS Washington (CNN) -- In what have become known as the "Jesus pencil" and "candy cane" cases‚ the Supreme Court refused Monday to consider appeals from the families of elementary school students over distribution of religious-themed gifts on campus. At issue was whether school officials can be sued for violating the First Amendment
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Today’s society has been largely impacted from cases years ago‚ these cases changed many peoples’ lives. Before there was equality‚ there were arguments almost everyday regarding segregation and racism. To emphasize‚ some disagreements had to be settled by the Supreme Court‚ and the ruling made still have a lasting effect today. The Supreme Court has made many ruling effecting civil rights: Plessy vs. Ferguson‚ Brown vs. Board of Education‚ and Loving vs. Virginia. In Plessy vs. Ferguson‚ the Court’s
Premium African American Black people Race
Supreme Court Case CJA/354 Supreme Court Case The discovery of unethical billing alongside unethical accounting practices provoked a chain reaction towards a hospital accountant by the name of Rehberg. An accountant trying to serve justice was entangled in a web of lies. Rehberg vs. Paulk is a very interesting Supreme Court case. Rehberg vs. Paulk embodied much of the injustice that is not presented to the public when sworn officials break the very laws that are supposed to be
Premium Jury Criminal law Law
a statement also. When their case was heard in the courtroom‚ they changed their story and said they were innocent. They tried to say that they were forced into confessing‚ because of
Premium Police Crime Capital punishment
single-purpose container exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement be based on the knowledge of a layperson because it satisfies the fundamental principles established by the U.S. Supreme Court for Fourth Amendment standards by being workable‚ objective‚ and limiting the risk of intrusion? STATEMENT OF THE CASE The Voorhees
Premium College Harvard University John F. Kennedy
Justin Borne Professor Preston May 10‚ 2014 BUSI 2301-4005 Karen L. JERMAN‚ Petitioner‚ v. CARLISLE‚ McNELLIE‚ RINI‚ KRAMER & ULRICH LPA‚ et al.No. 08-1200. United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Supreme Court of the United States Decided April 21‚ 2010.Page(s) 890-891 Karen L. Jerman had a mortgage with Countrywide Home Loans and was contacted by the law firm Carlisle‚ McNellie‚ Rini‚ Kramer & Ulrich LPA‚ on behalf of Country Wide‚ seeking a foreclosure on Jerman’s
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Appeal
The United States Supreme Court is the highest federal court to decide the outcome of cases from lower courts. All decisions and outcomes of the case are final‚ but the case must go through proper channels before going to the Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court has the authority to overturn‚ question‚ and investigate cases that were decided in lower courts. Researchers stated that the President of the United States has the authority to nominate a potential candidate with the advice and
Premium
as the people may think they are in increasing the autonomy of the states. The court case of medical marijuana under Chief Justice Rehnquist did not end what they called the “federalist revolution”‚ because there was none. This court case was a case that obviously had significance throughout the country as it has been a highly spoke about topic. I believe that the ruling in favor of the states was expected in this case which is why not much power was shifted from the central government to the states
Premium Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Congress
Each court period in U.S. history impacted the U.S. Supreme Court differently. When the new era of the Warren court was established in 1953‚ President Dwight D. Eisenhower had appointed Earl Warren as the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court thinking that Warren would introduce and spread conservative views throughout the U.S. Supreme Court when in fact he led the court into making liberal decisions. Warren surprised and tricked Eisenhower by his decisions in landmark court cases. The cases heard
Premium Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Brown v. Board of Education United States Constitution