ABSTRACT India is the largest democracy with federal form of government. The fiscal arrangements in India have evolved in a quasi-federal system to meet the requirements of centralized planning in a mixed economy structure and their sources of revenue for both Centre and State were clearly demarcated with regard to the financial relationship and the responsibilities between them. Our constitution provides residual powers to the Centre and makes clear division of fiscal powers between the Centre
Premium Tax Income Public finance
I. Introduction William Howard Taft had desired to fill a seat on the Supreme Court throughout his distinguished career. Briefly considered for the Supreme Court as early as 1889‚ Taft accepted the position of Solicitor-General in 1890 with the hope that he would one day sit on the other side of the bench. Twice‚ however‚ he refused Theodore Roosevelt’s tender of appointment to the Supreme Court—to the seats vacated by Justices Shiras and Brown. Nellie Taft’s ambitions for the White House and Taft’s
Premium United States President of the United States World War II
Federalism and Gay Marriage Federalism is supposed to be the safe-fail for the American government so that the American people are best represented and their best interests are upheld. The Constitution grants powers to both the state governments as well as the national government as the Founders could see the benefits for trying to stabilize a nation but not put the whole nation under the scrutiny of one power. With the powers being divided yet limitedly intertwined has caused quite a few national
Premium United States Federal government of the United States United States Constitution
Federalism has been put in place to allow two or more entities to share control over one area. In the United States‚ power is separated between the national government and state government‚ which prohibits one area of government gaining too much control. This is called cooperative federalism‚ which is where national‚ state‚ and local government work together to solve common problems. The other type of federalism is called dual federalism. Dual federalism is like a layered cake because the state and
Premium United States President of the United States United States Constitution
there have been very few reported cases challenging drug courts jurisdiction or procedure‚ there is no valid argument against its procedures in terms of constitutional rights. However‚ questions expressed by both advocates and critics of judicial innovation and the different roles judges partake are seen to show the constitutional rights of drug participants are being overlooked (Lane‚ 2003). The broad question remains is whether proactive judges taking on the role of problem-solving can still provide
Premium Law Crime Criminal law
the Supreme Court of the United States. DOMA was opposed by same-sex couples who claimed that the act violated their Constitutional rights. The act‚ passed in 1996‚ stated that the Federal government did not have to recognize same-sex marriages‚ even though they were considered legal marriages in certain states‚ therefore not giving federal benefits to same-sex married couples. The benefits included Social Security and immigration rights. DOMA was deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court‚ saying
Free Same-sex marriage Marriage United States Constitution
the Supreme Council. The first Supreme Council of the Katipunan was formed around August 1892‚ a month after the founding of the society. The Supreme Council was headed by an elected president‚ followed by the secretary/secretaries‚ the treasurer‚ and the fiscal. The Supreme Council also had its councilors (Kasanguni); the number varied through presidencies.[14] To distinguish from presidents of lower sanggunian or councils (below) the president of the Supreme Council was called the Supreme President
Premium Philippine Revolution
society. Notwithstanding their intentions‚ woman faced many disadvantages that woman faced in the Qing court system. Many common instances of this were expedited court preceding without the thorough investigation of both the physical and verbal evidence of certain cases. A good example of this can be found in the case of Ms. Wang who was accused of murdering her husband Zhang Zhisheng. How were the courts lack of thoroughly assessing both the physical and verbal evidence relevant in understanding how women
Premium Gender Sociology Woman
"Understanding Federalism. Based on the section‚ “ Picket-Fence Federalism‚” Give your own interpretation of picket-fence federalism.List and explain at least three strategies states used to respond to welfare reform following the implementation of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996. Relate your answer specifically to state discretionary rule-making and changes in the categorization of case studies.My understanding of Picket fence federalism is all levels of the federal
Premium Federalism Federal government of the United States Federal government
Danielle Waldner December 7‚ 2015 Professor Custis Case Brief MAYNARD‚ WARDEN‚ ET AL. v. CARTWRIGHT‚ 486 US 356. June 6‚ 1988 Facts: The evening of May 4‚ 1982‚ Charma and Hugh Riddle were in their living room watching television. Mrs. Riddle proceeded to leave the room to go to the bathroom‚ but was surprised to find “respondent Cartwright” in the hallway with a shotgun in his hands (1). Charma Riddle fought with Cartwright for the gun‚ but Cartwright was able to shoot Mrs. Riddle twice in the legs
Premium Murder Capital punishment Crime