Tree Identification Log 1. Abies grandis‚ Grand Fir The Grand fir is a tall stately tree that can grow up to 80 metres when mature. The leaves are flat with rounded and notched ends and are dark green and grooved on top of two white bands underneath. The seed cones are barrel-shaped and yellowish-green‚ growing upright on the branches. The bark is a smooth and greyish brown with white spots and blisters filed with gummy resin when young. The bark becomes furrow and scaly with age. The Okanagon
Premium Pine
The Doctrine of Signatures is profound ancient wisdom that is purposely being suppressed. It states that every fruit and vegetable has a certain pattern that resembles a body organ‚ and that this pattern acts as a signal or sign as to that fruit or vegetables benefit to us. Modern science confirms that the ancient “Doctrine of Signatures” is astoundingly accurate. Why does this vital knowledge remain hidden? The healing and nourishing properties of any fruit or vegetable reflected in‚ and ultimately
Premium Nutrition Eye Vegetable
Student Name: Goal: I aspire keep my heart rate in the target zone no later than July 10 2013. Date Warm-Up Physical Activity Intensity (Light‚ Medium‚ or High) Cool-Down Minutes 7-5-13 biking Inner tubing High biking 120 7-6-13 walk basketball High walk 150 7-8-13 walk baseball Medium biking 120 Total: 390 minutes Reflections: 1. Do you believe your cardiovascular routine is improving your fitness? Why or why not? Yes I can do things longer
Premium Exercise
Pher Pher A data flow diagram (DFD) is a graphical representation of the "flow" of data through an information system‚ modeling its process aspects. Often they are a preliminary step used to create an overview of the system which can later be elaborated.[2] DFDs can also be used for the visualization of data processing (structured design). A DFD shows what kinds of data will be input to and output from the system‚ where the data will come from and go to‚ and where the data will be stored. It
Premium Unified Modeling Language
The Challenger disaster is a prime example of poor leadership and Groupthink. When examining the disaster that took the lives of 7 people‚ this occurred do to multiple forms of neglect and pressure felt by leaders (UK Essays‚ 2015). This disaster occurred due to numerous defects within NASA’s engineering leaders‚ pressure from the media‚ public opinion‚ and the relationship with leaders at Morton Thiokol‚ makers of the defective O-rings that ultimately destroyed the Challenger into pieces (Dimitroff
Premium Space Shuttle Space exploration NASA
Santhosh Hari Krishnan Professor M Gaboury Law 1038 27 November 2016 SPACE SHUTTLE CHALLENGER ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION Introduction: The space shuttle challenger took away the life of 7 crew members on January 28‚ 1986. The spacecraft was broke up into small parts on the Atlantic Ocean and the banks of central Florida on US time 11:39 am. The reason behind the disintegration was the O-Ring seal in the right solid rocket booster failed at the liftoff of the shuttle.The failure caused a breach in
Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Challenger
exploration without technology? Soon I will answer that question‚ but for now let’s see where we are. The Aqualung is a device that started the line of deep sea equipment. Next was the Jim Suit. For this reason‚ the Deepsea Challenger. The Aqualung‚ Jim Suit‚ and Deepsea Challenger are all portions of technology that have contributed to deep sea exploration. First and foremost‚ In the 1940’s one of the first underwater devices was invented‚ the Aqualung. This idea was created by an underwater explorer
Premium Oxygen Scuba diving Underwater diving
delays‚ Challenger launched at 11:38 a.m. EST on Jan. 28‚ 1986” (Chow‚ 2011). The ship exploded 73 seconds after liftoff (Howell‚ 2012). The (mechanical) cause of the accident points to pressure seals (O-rings) but more importantly points to the serious problems that NASA had with its communication channels and safety information systems (Mahler & Casamayou‚ 2009‚ p. 40) Structural and Mechanical Factors As aforementioned in the paragraph above pressure rings are blamed for the Challenger incident
Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Columbia Space Shuttle Challenger
“The Tenth and Final Mission of the Challenger Space Shuttle” The Challenger Space Shuttle exploded seventy three seconds after liftoff. All the crew on board died on January 28‚ 1986‚ all of America was in shock. How and why did it happen. Roger Bogilay told NASA the the o’rings on the shuttle would not seal right in the extreme cold. NASA previously delayed the launch six times before liftoff. At liftoff black smoke came out of the right engine booster for two seconds due to the oring being burned
Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Challenger Space Shuttle Columbia
On January 28‚ 1986‚ at approximately 11:39a.m. the space shuttle challenger exploded in front of the whole world‚ whether you were sitting‚ standing‚ or listening‚ it was a tragedy that should have been and could have been easily prevented. It involved physically killing seven passengers aboard the space shuttle Challenger and mentally killing their families and close friends that were not aboard. If only NASA had just listen and Morton Thiokol stood by their engineers‚ then maybe those seven passengers
Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Columbia Space Shuttle Challenger