What do you understand by Comparative Public Administration? Comparative Public Administration is an applied‚ intercultural‚ interdisciplinary‚ explanatory field of study which carries out cross-cultural investigations in order to provide solutions for management problems sooner and develop management technologies further. It is no accident that the field focuses upon growth‚ reform and capacity building since Comparative Public Administration is in many ways about identifying those best practices
Premium
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are two political philosophers‚ but d have a distinct view of the world. Like for example‚ Hobbes thought of how society would function without laws and Locke thought of the government should work for the interest of the citizens. Comparing these two philosopher would show they they would define the state of nature as a philosopher‚ Thomas Hobbes is an English Philosopher which is best known for his political contemplations. His principle circumstance was in what manner
Premium Political philosophy John Locke Social contract
assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie by Gavrilo Princip‚ an ethnic Serb and Yugoslav nationalist from the group Young Bosnia‚ which was supported by the Black Hand‚ a nationalist organization in Serbia.[1] The crisis came after a long and difficult series of diplomatic clashes among the Great Powers (Italy‚ France‚ Germany‚ Britain‚ Austria-Hungary and Russia) over European and colonial issues in the decade before 1914 that had left tensions high. In turn these public clashes
Premium World War I Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina
Hobbes argues that the sovereign’s absolute authority is vital to the self-preservation and maintenance of civil peace of the commonwealth. Without these‚ there would be civil war and chaos. He believes that the benefits of having a sovereign outweigh the disadvantages‚ despite the many rights that the sovereign is entitled to. This is why Hobbes believes that those living under the rule of the sovereign still exercise freedom. For Hobbes‚ liberty is defined as the ability to act in accordance to
Premium Political philosophy Social contract State of nature
In Hobbes’ "Leviathan"‚ we spoke about how he viewed primal humans as being in a "state of war/nature." Although this was hypothetical‚ I do agree with it to be somewhat true. Back in a time of humans with no structure or agreement socially of norms or folkways‚ it probably made life confusing and unpredictable. I believe that in that particular state of nature‚ fearing death was probably equal to the need to kill/defend. It is hard for me to believe that at some point humans actually began to
Premium Thought Human
Thomas Hobbes were both social contract theorists and natural law theorists. Locke can be rightfully thanked for being one of the first people to come up with ideas that eventually became a part of Americas and Britain’s constitution. Locke believed that man was good by nature while Hobbes believed that man was bad and that society would not exist were it not for the power of the state. Locke on the other hand said the state only exists to keep the natural rights of its citizens. Thomas Hobbes spent
Premium
At the end of chapter one‚ The Prison Door‚ there is a passage which describes a single rose bush next to the prison door. Although the author did give many interpretations of the rosebush’s meaning‚ there was no definite one. I decided to explore different interpretations. These roses would “offer their fragrance and fragile beauty to the prisoner.” (42) These soft‚ red roses offer a small but bold contrast to the strict‚ black and white world of the puritans. The vibrant flowers give a splash
Premium Rose
glorified and upheld onto the high grounds of acceptedness and agreement. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke‚ two individuals responsible for voicing their beliefs on the topic of the roles and forms of government on the world and on civilians‚ both faced this very controversy in the way that they spoke of the beliefs that they shared‚ in which contrasted
Premium Religion Psychology Philosophy
What is the argumentative function of Hobbes’s ‘state of nature’ and of Rawls’s ‘original position?’ Compare these accounts and critically assess their cogency. Both Hobbes’ ‘state of nature’ and Rawls’ ‘original position’ are used to provide individuals with good reason to consent to a social contract and to accept their state. The two arguments are formulated with quite different end goals in mind. The ‘state of nature’ presents a terrifying world without reason or safety and is designed to force
Premium Political philosophy State of nature Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and Joseph Butler (1692-1752) hold contrasting views on how to build a human society. For Hobbes the most important issue is to achieve and maintain peace‚ and points out‚ that men ought to give up their natural rights and transfer them to a sovereign. For Butler the best way is to follow the rules of God which are already inside of every man’s soul. The two both start with an account of human nature: Hobbes notes that it is lead by appetites and aversions and results in
Premium Thomas Hobbes Leviathan Religion