Z. JUDGMENT NO. 26 OF 1974. Flynote Criminal Law - Attempting to cause death contrary to s. 215 of the Penal Code - No unequivocal finding of actual intention to kill - Whether conviction possible. Criminal Procedure - Minor offence -Section 181 of the Criminal Procedure Code- Whether s. 224 of the Penal Code minor offence in relation to s. 215 of the Penal Code. Headnote The appellant was convicted of attempting to cause death contrary to s. 215 of the Penal Code. The learned judge held
Premium Criminal law Crime
Inc.‚ Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa‚ Inc.‚ link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME‚ Inc.‚ Advertisement Has WIRETIME‚ Inc.‚ committed any torts? If so‚ explain. Wiretime‚ Inc.’s ad in the well-known industry magazine stated that BUGusa‚ Inc. electronic recording devices are low quality and not reliable for more than a month (University of Phoenix‚ 2013). This tort is defamation since it can harm the company’s reputation. This
Premium Tort Strict liability Negligence
1.0 Areas of law Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has long been a touchy issue for governments not just in Australia‚ but around the world as well. Companies in Australia are governed by the corporation’s act‚ which outlines the legal capacity and power of a company. The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 57A1‚ defines a corporation as a separate legal entity‚ that includes any corporate body and unincorporated bodies that may sue‚ be sued or hold property in the name of an office holder appointed
Premium Corporation Corporate social responsibility Types of business entity
also known as a family tree it can allow us to keep records of the past. The Edwards family tree shows great record from the early 1700 ’s to the mid 1800 ’s. This family tree demonstrates when a person was baptized; when they got married; and when they passed away. The Edwards family chart show the different relations of marriages and fertility rate from today ’s society. From the chart we can determine that the Edwards family show a different demography compared to todays society. This is because
Premium Marriage Family
THE INDIAN FAMILY FRAME---- RESPONSIBILITY OF LAW *Dr. K. Uma Devi **Dr. G. Indira Priya Darsini Introduction: Family is a basic and universal unit of human society. It performs functions that are necessary for the continuity‚ integration and development of social life. In most traditional societies family has been the unit of social‚ cultural‚ religious‚ economic and political activities and organizations. In modern industrial societies‚ the family performs primarily the functions of reproduction
Premium Law Marriage Human rights
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI FACULTY OF LAW TAPE RECORDED LECTURES THE LAW OF EVIDENCE LLB II 2003 LAW OF EVIDENCE Lesson 2 RELEVANCE & ADMISSIBILITY RES GESTAE ‘Res Gestae’‚ it has been said‚ is a phrase adopted to provide a respectable legal cloak for a variety of cases to which no formula of precision can be applied’. The words themselves simply mean a transaction. Under the inclusionary common law doctrine of Res Gestae‚ a fact or opinion which is so closely associated in time‚ place
Premium Evidence law Jury
liability in the exact same way that they apply to negligence claims. Liability can arise on occupiers for omissions since their relationship gives rise to duty to take action to ensure the reasonable safety of visitors. The law relating to occupiers’ liability originated in common law but is now contained in two major pieces of legislation: Occupiers Liability Act 1957 - which imposes an obligation on occupiers with regard to ’lawful visitors’ Occupiers Liability Act 1984 - which imposes liability
Premium Tort law Tort
following I will commit myself to the above-mentioned question by firstly reconstructing Anselm´s proof of God´s existence and secondly considering his position in the light of the critique put forward by Gaunilo‚ Aquinas and Kant. St. Anselm (1033-1109) was an Italian philosopher and monk who later left his country to become Archbishop of Canterbury. As Anselm firmly believed in God‚ he wanted to prove God´s existence through use of logic and reason and thus set out to demonstrate it in his most popular
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Ontological argument
external legislations than the internal policy. All employees are workers‚ but not all workers are employees‚Broadbent v Crisp and Halawi v WDFG UK Ltd applied‚ and Equality Act 2010 s.83(2) considered. Since the term “employee” is narrower than the term “worker”‚ the rights and liabilities are consequently different in law(Emir‚ 2012). As mentioned‚ a salaried partner can or cannot be an employee‚ which relates to handling member departures‚ tax payment and many other restrictions(Gannon‚ 2014). However
Premium Contract Jury Fact
NATIONAL ECONOMIC UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL Module title: Business Law Title of assessment: Michael Ltd Course: E-MBA 13B Submission date: Wednesday‚ 8th April 2015 Time: no later than 18:00PM Submission location: Member in group: 1. Nguyễn Thanh Mai EMBA13102 2. Nguyễn Thị Ngọc EMBA13112 3. Nguyễn Văn Huyên EMBA13077 Word count: 1‚313 words. TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS 3 I. In case of material delivered to Refressment Ltd and orders received by Refressment Ltd were not passed on
Premium Subsidiary Parent company Corporation