Hospitality Law Hospitality law has evolved as a specialty within the legal profession in the last several decades. It is also offered as a course on the undergraduate and graduate levels as well as in some law schools. A typical hospitality law course covers the history of hospitality law‚ the impact of federal and state civil rights laws on the hospitality industry‚ and an extensive discussion of contract law‚ including discussions of remedies for overbooking and a guest’s breach of the contract
Premium Hotel
Hong Kong Law Exam Date: 24 May 2010 (Tuesday) Time: 14:30~17:15 Total answer three questions @ 300marks 1 question @ 100 marks 5 choose 3 questions Business Law Lecture 2 and 3 - Essential elements of a contract ← Essential elements of a contract □ Offers □ Acceptance □ Consideration □ Intention to be legally bound ← Consideration P.29~31 ← Past consideration P.32~33 ← Promise to perform existing obligations P.34~36 ← Part payment of a debt
Free Common law Law Tort
negligence due to his position of care of his child Niral? In other words does he bear some responsibility for the consequences of Niral’s behaviour? Rules The tort of negligence is central to the issues raised; therefore the plaintiff must prove all three requirements under the tort of negligence in order to
Premium Tort law Common law Tort
The legal issue is whether or not George is liable for Adam’s injury due to the attractive nuisance doctrine. The attractive nuisance doctrine states that possessors of property can be responsible for injury to children if 1) The defendant was the possessor of and knew there was an artificial condition around which children were likely to trespass; 2) The defendant knew or should have known the condition posed an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm;
Premium Tort Tort law
In this case‚ John has a cause of action against TAFE for his injury from the accident‚ he had rights to claim for his cost from TAFE that he did not fix the engine on the wrong way. There are five steps about the law of negligence‚ first is duty of care‚ it is a legal duty owed by one person to another‚ in this case‚ TAFE owed a duty of care to John. Because based on foreseeable test‚ John is a student who graduated form the TAFE‚ he also proved that the instructor of TAFE gives him a wrong instructions
Premium Tort Negligence Duty of care
The preliminary issue in the question is fast food restaurant is vicariously liable for the Cathy’s negligence. Since the concerns about the law of tort‚ the following analysis will focus on the possible tortuous liability instead of the potential breach of the contractual obligation and the criminal acts. In principle of vicarious liability‚ to make an employer liable for a wrong committed by an employee‚ the plaintiff must establish that: 1. defendant is an employee ( as opposed to an independent
Premium Tort law Employment Vicarious liability
Definition of goods The contact of sale Agreement to sell Formation of the contract Terms of the contract Transfers of the property Transfer of the title Performance of the contract Remedies for breach 1.1 Definition of Goods Sale of Good Act 1957 defines the word goods as meaning ‘every kind of movable property other than actionable claims and money‚ and includes stock and shares‚ growing crops‚ grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed
Premium Contract Contract law Breach of contract
facts of the above-captioned file‚ along with the applicable law and summarized same in this memorandum. Mrs. Mary Smith suffered an injury to her right ankle in an automobile accident on 10/3/95. After surgery and months of rehabilitation‚ Mrs. Smith still suffers daily. I have researched the facts regarding a personal injury action against Paul Joseph‚ as well as a medical malpractice action against the medical providers. Applicable Law Personal Injury Statute of Limitation – 4 years from
Premium Tort law Traffic collision Road accidents
Anti-discrimination Law Question 1: [Sexsual harassment] Sue works for a company called X-Pest Pty Ltd. One day Sue walked into the lunchroom of the business. In the lunchroom was a number of male and female staff that were looking at the latest Queensland Netball Team calendar called “Chicks of Netball”. The players in the calendar were semi-naked. As Sue walked into the room‚ Bruce‚ who knew Sue was very shy around men‚ was pinning up Miss October on the staffroom fridge. As Sue came over
Premium Bullying Abuse Joint and several liability
Achem Pte Ltd (Achem) was in the business of trading in industrial chemicals. The company was founded by Heng and Tan. Both were directors and shareholders of the company. Other than Heng and Tan‚ the other shareholders include Heng’s and Tan’s relatives and some of these relatives were also employees of Achem. Employee turnover was low and every employee was treated as part of one big family. After several years‚ Tan decided to sell his 55% stake in Achem to Union Pte Ltd (Union) because he
Premium Tort law Standard of care Reasonable person