Adams v Lindsell (1818) The defendant wrote to the claimant offering to sell them some wool and asking for a reply ’in the course of post’. The letter was delayed in the post. On receiving the letter the claimant posted a letter of acceptance the same day. However‚ due to the delay the defendant’s had assumed the claimant was not interested in the wool and sold it on to a third party. The claimant sued for breach of contract. Held: There was a valid contract which came in to existence the moment
Premium Contract
cannot recover damages if he suffers harm * To prove‚ must have: * Full knowledge of the risk * Section 5F & 5G * * an unpressured decision to run the risk in question (voluntariness) * Common law * A person who was constrained by the circumstances and was constrained from making a free choice will not be regarded as acting voluntarily * This is not met if: * P has a brief interval to make their decision
Premium Tort law Law Duty of care
Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? That is a question that is ask everyday for as long as there been conflicted. In my opinion peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society because showing any violate to the government or the people. For example‚ in Henry David Thoreau ‚" Civil Disobedience"‚ explain that should be change in standard society as he have expressed "O’er the grave where our hero we buried." Henry wanted to escape traditional
Premium African American Martin Luther King Jr.
Responsibility Looking back at the last three years there has only been one profitable quarter. It is too early to take on such a lucrative responsibility. It would be safer to wait two or three quarters to see exactly where we are financially and how much flexibility we have. Estimating that are next quarters are just like the last with a $2 million profit pre tax. The $500‚000 annual cost would be 6.25% of our total profits for the year. That is a low percentage but with since we just now made
Premium Profit
ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Vol.1 Issue 1‚ May 2011‚ ISSN 2231-5780 CONSUMER PROTECTION AND CONSUMERISM IN INDIA Ms Kiran Chaudhry*;Ms Tanu Chandhiok**;Mrs Parveen Dewan*** * Assistant Professor‚ Shivaji College‚ University of Delhi‚ Delhi‚ India **Lecturer‚ Yamuna Group of Institutions‚ Gadholi‚ Jagadhri‚ Haryana‚ India *** Principal‚ Sanatan Dharam Model School Jagadhri‚ Yamunanagar‚ Haryana‚ India __________________________________________________________________
Free Consumer protection Consumer Office of Fair Trading
Blake v. Barnard 1840 A man put his gun at the head of another and said‚ ’Be quiet or I blow your brain out’. No assault. If the person did what he is told nothing would happen. Contrast: READ v. CROKER (1853). Byrne (Canada) 1968 Canada Supreme Court A man went into a bank. Having a jacket over his hand‚ he said: I have a gun‚ give me the money or I shoot. No assault. He did not show the gun. Persuasive precedent. Janvier v. Sweeny 1919 Court of Appeal Private detectives tried
Premium Tort Tort law
Left Brain vs. Right Brain; How Does it Impact Learning Have you ever wondered if you were a left brain dominate person or a right brain? Hopefully through this paper I will be able to give enough details so you‚ the reader‚ can decide whether you are dominate with the left or right brain. Along with learning ability and the characteristics that you probably experience or do not notice that you do sub-consciously. Also‚ I will throw in some of the myths and theories that have been thought
Premium Human brain
legislatures during the Reconstruction era were voted out by Southern whites and voted in the would be dominate Democrats for decades. The first laws pushed by southern Democrats were intended to suppress blacks first and foremost‚ and also stop at any means their vote. The dominating ideal of white supremacy still engulfed the South after the Civil War and Jim Crow laws acted as the embodiment of these racist ideals. To keep segregation and the separation of races in all matters of life‚ such as transportation
Premium African American Jim Crow laws Black people
The issue is whether the defendant Sykt Jebat can be held liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs‚ Sam‚ Jojo and Lan under the law of Occupiers’ Liability. Occupiers’ liability concerns injury caused to a plaintiff as a result of defective condition of the land‚ building and premises. In order to establish occupiers’ liability‚ the occupier must have a sufficient degree of control over the premise. Lord Denning in Wheat v Lacon & Co Ltd (1966) held that “whenever a person has a sufficient
Premium Tort law Standard of care Duty of care
Chapter 2 Global E-Business: How Businesses Use Information Systems 2.1 © 2007 by Prentice Hall Management Information Systems Chapter 2 Global E-Business: How Businesses Use Information Systems 2.1 Business Processes and Information Systems What is Business Process 2.2 © 2007 by Prentice Hall Management Information Systems Chapter 2 Global E-Business: How Businesses Use Information Systems 2.1 Business Processes and Information Systems • Manner in which work is organized‚ coordinated
Premium Management Knowledge management Information systems