of Peer-reviewed and Non-peer-reviewed Sources First Last ABC University Abstract Doctoral students have a wealth of readily available information from which to conduct research. Not all of this information is credible. The challenge for the doctoral student is to pick high quality sources. This paper will discuss peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources‚ and how the CARS Checklist can help find credible material for research. Credibility Assessment of Peer-reviewed and Non-peer-reviewed
Premium Peer review
Investigating Use of Force Before and After Complaints: An Operational Template to Avoid Civil Liability Richard H. Martin‚ Auburn University Montgomery Jeffrey L. Gwynne‚ Auburn University Montgomery Charles A. Gruber‚ Chief (Ret.)‚ CAG Consultants Introduction Many police agencies lack policy‚ procedure‚ and diligence by police supervisors to investigate NON-excessive use of force incidents before a citizen files a formal complaint of a civil rights violation against the police. Police by
Premium Police
workload that we’re expected to keep up with. It’s so easy to get overwhelmed. We have projects‚ tests‚ papers‚ exams‚ midterms‚ finals‚ co-ops. Stress can easily build without a good strategy of tackling these assignments. A second reason is pressure to do well. Pressure to do well can come from within. That’s the inner drive‚ that inner motivation pushing you to succeed. Most here desire to do their best and to get good grades. A third reason is change in environment. Now this may affect some of us more
Premium Personal life Stress Management
Axia College Material Appendix G Peer Review Checklist* What is the main point of this paper? Whether video games are good or bad for people‚ and how popular this industry really is. What is the greatest strength of this paper? I enjoyed the way the author has all of his research in such great order. His numbers and statistics help explain what he/she is writing about. The graphs are also very informative. The author studied the subject very well. What material does not seem to
Premium Writing English-language films Research
A Jury of Her Peers BSM Portfolio Assignment This paper demonstrates Hodges University’s learning outcome of critical thinking. Jason George – First Wheel Hodges University MNA-4100 Economics for Managers Professor Ron Harbour Due: March 27‚ 2013 Submitted: March 27‚ 2013 Graded by BSM Instructor: __________________________ Grade Awarded: __________________________________ Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Situational Analysis……………………………………………………………………………
Premium Critical thinking Maslow's hierarchy of needs
that it is a common pressure faced by the youth of todays society. In this essay i am going to write about the pressures faced by teenage girls from the media to be attractive to the opposite sex‚ the pressures from boys in an intimate relationship‚ and the pressure from society to behave and act in a certain way towards boys to fit in and impress them. I am hoping to find imformation on this topic so that i can fully understand it‚ and work out ways to overcome the pressures so that i am prepared
Free Human sexuality Sexual intercourse Human sexual behavior
A literature review is important for finding and evaluating peer-reviewed sources for writing a research paper. “Peer-review is the act of carefully evaluating a work by one or more experts of the same field of work‚ to determine its credibility‚ research methodology‚ accuracy‚ and relevance to the literature” (Camtasia Studio 8‚ 2014). Using sources that are peer-reviewed is important because “culturally proficient research practices are necessary to dispel destructive myths and stereotypes” and
Premium Sociology Social work Research
Collaboration and Peer Reviews Reflective Journal 3 One major advantage of collaborating on a project is that working with a group can infuse a project with a rich array of perspectives. Another advantage is it makes the project more time effective because you have a group and you can assign different tasks to each member. A disadvantage of collaborating is that you are dealing with a lot of different personalities that can sometimes clash. Another disadvantage would be some members may be
Premium Collaboration Education Psychology
Peer Evaluation Sample The first speech I am going to evaluate is Jane Doe’s speech about why music is good for people and the positives effect of it. Jane started out very well by giving a personal example of using music in her own life which got the audience’s attention. I liked it when she started off with a story and example because it helped me understand what she was trying to say to the class. She then introduced her topic and stated her reasons of why everybody should have an iPod and
Premium Speech Critical thinking Debut albums
Self and Peer Editing Checklist Self Edit Yes/No Peer Edit Completed by ___________________________________ Yes/No & Comments Did I include an interesting hook to grab the reader’s attention? Did she include an interesting hook to grab the reader’s attention? Did I provide enough background information to let the reader know what/why this is an issue? Did she provide enough background information to let the reader know what/why this is an issue? Did I state a clear claim‚ that argues only one
Premium Critical thinking The Reader Attention