What to Keep in a Personnel File The basic building block of any Human Resources’ function and/or department is the personnel file. Phone Doctors® keeps a hard copy file of every employee in a central location. A personnel file is made for each employee on the date of hire. Most‚ but not all‚ important job-related documents should go in the file‚ including: Job application and/or resume IRS Form W-4 (the Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate) Receipt or signed acknowledgment of employee
Premium Employment Document File system
matex.com.sg/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9&lang=si Noe and others‚ Human Resource Management‚ Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Dr. Fang.L.C.‚ 2010. Human Resource Management: How Does the HR Strategy Support An Innovation Oriented Business Strategy? An Investigation of Institutional Context and Organizational Practices in Indian Firms. (Online) 49 (3)‚ pp.377-400. Available from: www.interscience.wiley.com/10.1002/hrm/20356. Cited 12 December
Premium Human resource management Management Strategic management
As women increasingly enter the labor market in the US‚ equity and anti-discrimination issues between genders are addressed great importance‚ especially the earning gap. The earning difference between women and men is narrowing down‚ however‚ the ratio of the wage gained by women to that by men still triggers discussion about the cause of this gap. The ratio in 1955 was 64 percent‚ and by 2007 the gap had closed to the degree where the ratio was 78 percent. While traditional social explanation ascribed
Premium Gender Gender role Transgender
The United States v. Lopez case was the first United States Supreme Court case since the early 1930’s to create laws that limit Congress’s power. On March 10th of 1992‚ Lopez brought a handgun into school. When the police asked him if he did bring it ‚ he didn’t lie‚ he said the " yes I did carry the gun".Not a few days later Lopez was charged with violating federal laws which banned guns on all school properties in the United States. Because of what he did ‚ the federal law came with an act called
Premium Firearm Gun politics in the United States Gun
Title and Citation: Dennis v. united States 341 U.S. 494 71 S. CT. 857 (1951) 2. Facts of the Case: a. The Smith Act made it a criminal offense to knowingly or willfully advocate the overthrowing of any government in the United States by force or to attempt to commit or conspire to commit the crime the same. The Petitioners were brought up on charges under the Act for allegedly willfully and knowingly conspiring to organize as the Communist Party of the United States‚ a group whose members advocated
Premium United States Cold War World War II
In the case of United States V. Parks‚ I think he should’ve been charged for the criminal offense of negligence. I understand that he believed he had designated competent employees to take charge of ensuring the proper sanitation of the warehouse and its products‚ however‚ he admitted at trial of having knowledge of unsanitary working conditions in one of his warehouses thanks to a warning letter from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Failing to take corrective action is also a violation of
Premium Fraud Ethics Law
Facts: In the Case of Blackshades v. the United States‚ defendant Alex Yucel‚ a citizen of Sweden‚ was charged with computer hacking using the malware‚ “RAT‚” under his company called Blackshades. Since he is the founder of the Blackshades‚ “Rat” had sold the malicious software to 6‚000 customers. Blackshades is a malware which includes a remote tool‚ called “RAT.” With the malware‚ it enables it to control the victims’ computers. According to the plaintiff‚ the federal government‚ Blackshades
Premium Computer security Security Computer
After reviewing the United States v. Parks case‚ I believe that Parks should have been charged with a crime. The responsible corporate officer doctrine states that even if the corporate officer did not know about the crime or engage in the crime then the court can still find the officer criminally liable (Kubasek‚ 2017 p. 161). In this case‚ Parks received a warning letter from the Food and Drug Administration and still failed to correct the unsanitary conditions. Parks should be convicted even
Premium Crime Automobile Ford Motor Company
United States v. Lopez Citations: United States v. Lopez‚ 514 U.S. 549‚ 115 S. Ct. 1624‚ 131 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1995). Facts: Alfonso Lopez‚ Jr.‚ a 12th grade high school student‚ was convicted for purposely carrying a handgun along with bullets onto a school zone for resale under the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. Issue: Did Congress really have the power to pass this act? Decision: The Court of Appeals took action and reversed the conviction on the basis that the commerce power
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Right to refuse treatment 2 In SELL v. UNITED STATES‚ the question was whether the constitution allows forcibly medicating a mentally ill defendant so that he/she can be competent for trial for serious crimes that are non-violent. The constitution does allow this but under certain circumstances. Sell was found to be mentally incompetent to stand trial after examination by a magistrate the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners. Sell decided to challenge the decision made by the
Premium United States United States Constitution Law