"Hume compatibilist" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 9 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy essay-miracles

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages

    about the Philosophers who are in support of miracles and those philosophers who do not believe in miracles. David Hume was an empiricist; this meant that he gained his knowledge through his senses. Hume derived his own specific definition of miracles and stated that is a ‘transgression of a law of nature brought about by a particular violation of deity’. This definition means that Hume believed that it was more likely that the report of a miracle was mistaken then the laws of nature was violated.

    Premium Metaphysics Atheism David Hume

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hume rothery rules

    • 911 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Metals and alloys. Hume-Rothery rules. 1. Three types of metals. 2. Alloys. Hume-Rothery rules. 3. Electrical resistance of metallic alloys. 4. Applications of metallic alloys. 5. Steels. Super alloys. 6. Electromigration in thin wires. Three types of metals Metals share common features that define them as a separate class of materials: • Good thermal and electrical conductors (Why?). • Electrical resistance increases with temperature (Why?). • Specific heat grows linearly with temperature

    Premium Solid Solubility Materials science

    • 911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the universe is governed by causal laws. Socrates- Felicia what is the definition of free will mean to you? Felicia- Free will means humanity and the ability to be able to choose your own situations and actions or desire and fulfilling accordance. (Hume) defines liberty as a power of acting or not of acting according to the determination of will. Free will give us the ability to be able to choose one way from right and wrong. Free will means that is up to me to choose the job that I want or the house

    Premium Free will Causality Metaphysics

    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Do You Believe in Miracles

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages

    question the validity of a miraculous event or experience and refuse to ascribe to the reasonable explanation that some things in the natural world cannot be proved by the method of science and are explicitly miraculous. A miracle can be defined by Hume as a ʻtransgression of a law of nature by the violation of a particular deity or invisible agentʼ. For scholars such as Maurice Wiles‚ Alastair McKinnon‚ and Steven Bayne a miracle can never occur because the actual concept of a miracle is incoherent

    Premium David Hume Philosophy Metaphysics

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The central argument of Hume’s paper is that determinism is obviously the root of all human actions. Hume says that all our actions are pre-determined due to causes and necessity. The human brain is structured to process two consecutive events as always in relation with each other. He is an empiricist and he argues that‚ this knowledge of causation is due to experiences. He makes very interesting and contradictory arguments to his own arguments. He argues that whatever is there in the social setup

    Premium Free will Metaphysics Causality

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Final Questions

    • 3278 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Andrea D. Lopez SMC 1311 May 8‚ 2013 Final Exam 1) What is justice according to Plato? How does Plato’s theory of the soul reflect his understanding of justice? Plato was a famous philosopher and a mathematician who lived from 429 to 374 B.C. Plato was the founder of The Academy of Athens and with the knowledge he gained from his professor‚ Socrates‚ he continued to spread his teachings to the youth. In the book‚ Republic‚ Plato defines justice as harmony with one self. If a person is content

    Premium Epistemology Philosophy John Locke

    • 3278 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Akira Kurosawa’s Rashomon relays a perplexing realization about the human condition‚ that the concept of truth is fallible‚ or may not exist at all. For‚ in each account of the Samurai’s death‚ the manner‚ location‚ culprit‚ and motivation is different. The film begins by providing the audience with the most basic evidence of the murder: That the samurai was found dead in a grove‚ that a cut rope lay next to him‚ and that no conceivable murder weapon -- knife or sword -- was found at the crime.

    Premium David Hume Empiricism John Locke

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hume on Probability Hume begins section six of “An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding” by stated right out that chance does not exist‚ but is merely a result of our ignorance of the causes behind any given event. He argues this by relating probability and belief. Belief arises when probability is at its most high. According to chance‚ any event may turn out anyway. Hume illustrates his point with a die. If a die were marked with one figure on four sides‚ while another figure on the other two

    Premium Probability theory Logic Critical thinking

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While many rationalists such as René Descartes support the notion that the concept of Inception is not possible‚ empiricists such as David Hume may think differently. Hume was an eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher known for his system of radical and philosophical empiricism‚ skepticism‚ and naturalism. In one of his works‚ Hume stated that one cannot create completely new ideas without either prior knowledge of those ideas‚ or experiencing those ideas. Put differently‚ he believed that the ideas

    Premium Philosophy Characters in Romeo and Juliet Romeo and Juliet

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    predict the future or prove truth. In "An Argument Against Skepticism‚" John Hospers argues that we can have absolute certainty because there is enough evidence from the past and from our own experiences to prove an argument to be true. Although both Hume and Hospers make strong arguments‚ Hospers’ philosophical beliefs on different levels of knowledge and evidence are more convincing than Hume’s concepts on knowledge and truth. Hume’s argument is based on the idea that we can only be certain of analytical

    Premium Logic Epistemology Inductive reasoning

    • 523 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Page 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 50