"Hume vs kant causality" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 15 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pursuit of luxury is one that enhances the gratification of the senses; it is this refinement that can be innocent or vicious. According to Hume‚ the pursuit of innocent indulgence is permitted‚ but when they are pursued at the expense of some virtue they become a vice. Vicious luxury is a vice in the way it “engrosses all a man’s expenses and leaves no ability for such acts if duty and generosity as are required by his situation and fortune” (P. 279). The distinction between the two luxuries

    Premium Morality Virtue Ethics

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immanuel Kant Paper

    • 1890 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Immanuel Kant HUM 400 12 Jun 2010 Kant ’s "Good Will" Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is one of the most influential philosophers in history of Western philosophy. A main representative of the Western-European classical philosophy‚ Immanuel Kant dealt with the best traditions of the German idealism. A human personality‚ according to Kant is the highest and absolute value. It is the personality‚ in Kant’s understanding‚ that towers the person over its own self and links the human being with

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 1890 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    David Hume Research Paper

    • 6305 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Why History Matters: Associations and Causal Judgment in Hume and Cognitive Science Mark Collier University of Minnesota‚ Morris Abstract: It is commonly thought that Hume endorses the claim that causal cognition can be fully explained in terms of nothing but custom and habit. Associative learning does‚ of course‚ play a major role in the cognitive psychology of the Treatise. But Hume recognizes that associations cannot provide a complete account of causal thought. If human beings lacked

    Premium David Hume Philosophy Psychology

    • 6305 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Haze Open burning on a large scale causes the haze. The burning can be because of natural forest fires or irresponsible men burning a vast area for cultivation. When either one of these takes place‚ the smoke from the fires rises and spreads to the surrounding areas. It can even travel as far as the neighbouring countries. For example‚ when there was extensive open burning in Indonesia‚ the haze spread to Malaysia and Singapore. In these countries‚ the situation is further aggravated by the pollution

    Premium Causality Affect

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    About David Hume

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    David hume The irrelevance of consent When we consider how nearly equal all men are in their bodily force‚ and even in their mental powers and faculties‚ till cultivated by education‚ we must necessarily allow‚ that nothing but their own consent could‚ at first‚ associate them together‚ and subject them to any authority. The people‚ if we trace government to its first origin in the woods and deserts‚ are the source of all power and jurisdiction‚ and voluntarily‚ for the sake of peace and order

    Free Political philosophy Government Civilization

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Empiricism‚ according to David Hume is a flawed and incomplete mode of thinking‚ this is largely due to the fact that one may never truly experience a cause. He poses the argument that causes are assumed using synthetic‚ not analytic judgment. This is the essence of Hume’s main argument that the view of actions and their consequences as logically dependent upon one another is necessarily flawed and detrimental to human understanding. He argues this in the following way. First‚ that empiricism is

    Premium Empiricism Scientific method Philosophy

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    others rights are met. Furthermore‚ in historical context‚ the obligation to the state has been explained by many political philosophers such as‚ Jean Jacques Rousseau‚ Immanuel Kant‚ and David Hume. Rousseau believed in a social contract‚ while Hume had a more pragmatic approach focusing on the usefulness of the state‚ and Kant focused on an individuals moral obligation to the state. Rousseau‚ describes the relationship between the state and a person as contractual‚ thereby explaining the state as a

    Premium Political philosophy Morality Social contract

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sajune Blanchard Introduction to Philosphy Descartes vs Hume Epistemology is a branch of philosophy that focuses on the theories of knowledge and justified beliefs. There are various methods that philosophers choose to arrive at knowledge and detect what can be true. Some of the philosophers that have played an important role in epistemology are René Descartes and David Hume. Even though they had spent their time doubting the sources of human knowledge‚ their approach was different although they

    Premium Philosophy Mind Epistemology

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is in the third antinomy where Kant addresses the possibility of freedom with causal necessity. Transcendental freedom is only possible for Kant if both the thesis and the antithesis of the dialectic are shown to be correct. By demonstrating both the thesis and the antithesis to be correct‚ Kant hopes to show that applying the question of freedom to the unconditioned totality of appearances is bound to lead towards irreconcilable errors. It is only by accepting the transcendental idealist position

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Epistemology

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume Is Grounded In Consent

    • 2711 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Introduction To have a political obligation is to have a moral duty to obey the laws of one’s state. On that point there is almost complete agreement among political philosophers but how does one acquire such an obligation? To this question many answers have been given and none till now commands reasonable assent. Several political theorists believe this obligation is grounded in consent. ‘Consent’ the dialectical apparatus that can distinguish hiking from trespass‚ love making from rape and boxing

    Premium Political philosophy Law Aristotle

    • 2711 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
Page 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 50