Critical Analysis of The Apology of Socrates by Plato Socrates was an orator and philosopher whose primary interests were logic‚ ethics and epistemology. In Plato’s Apology of Socrates‚ Plato recounts the speech that Socrates gave shortly before his death‚ during the trial in 399 BC in which he was charged with "corrupting the young‚ and by not believing in the gods in whom the city believes‚ also being a busybody and intervene gods business". The name of the work itself is not mean what it is
Premium Socrates Socratic method Philosophy
Analysis of Apology by Plato The Apology is an account by Plato of Socrates’ speech given at his trial in 399 BC. Socrates was an Athenian philosopher accused of two crimes: corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods. In Socrates’ speech‚ he explains to a jury of 501 Athenians why he is not guilty of the crimes he is accused of. He uses a variety of logical arguments to refute his charges yet in the end he is still found guilty and sentenced to death (Grube 21). Socrates’ use of
Premium Logic Socrates Argument
Descartes and Plato Explain both of descartes Arguments for the existence of God Descartes proof of God’s existence comes from his third meditation and is based on three ideas. He argues that innate idea exists within us‚ the fictitious or invented ideas are a result of our own imagination and adventitious ideas result from our experiences in the world. Descartes said‚ the idea of God is innate and cannot be invented. Descartes presents some arguments that lead to his conclusion. The first
Premium Ontology Existence Metaphysics
Euthyphro- Plato: Defining Socrates in your own words. Socrates during a session….. Untia Daun Bigelow PHI 208 Ethics and Moral Reasoning Patricia Addeso October 21‚ 2013 It seems that in the reading both Socrates and Euthyphro are both dealing with legal issues and they are discussing the differences and the similarities of their cases with one another. Socrates is a defendant in a suit accusing him of impiety which was brought against him by no other than Meletus who was not
Premium Plato Euthyphro Morality
David Hume is a naturalist‚ which means he believes our thoughts are not based on reason at all‚ but are based in nature. Hume suggests that nature is all we need to justify our beliefs. This means that we make conclusions about things around us based on habits and patterns. Hume suggests that experiences explain justifications and notions far greater than any rationalization. A part of Hume’s theory lies in the sentiment of feeling. “It must be excited by nature… [and] whenever any object is
Premium Philosophy Metaphysics David Hume
Holland defines miracles as a “remarkable and beneficial coincidence that is interpreted in a religious fashion‚” whereas David Hume‚ writing during the Enlightenment period as an empiricist claimed that miracles are both improbable and irrational. In his book‚ Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding‚ Hume defined miracles as a violation of the laws of nature. Although Hume may say that miracles are the least likely of events‚ that does not lead on to say that they do not occur at all; it is possible
Premium David Hume Scientific method Philosophy
Hume- Impressions = experiences perception of self. Many people have presupposed perceptions of self. Many consider Hume to be archaic. 17th century worldview presupposes science and science’s worldview of understanding nature. Wood has a view of nature as mechanistic‚ Hume shares Wood’s view. With Hume it’s presupposed. People often jump to Wood’s presuppositions without questioning his initial reasoning. Science is essentially mathematics applied to nature. Ledger Wood says everything is
Premium Psychology Concepts in metaphysics Mind
not vary with the relationships the person‚ whose character trait is being evaluated‚ has with us. It is therefore counterintuitive for Hume to have his account of morality based on sympathy‚ which apparently possesses such a biased character. When two persons‚ with different relationships with us‚ share
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B‚ thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen‚ he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes
Premium Mind Metaphysics Philosophy
Why History Matters: Associations and Causal Judgment in Hume and Cognitive Science Mark Collier University of Minnesota‚ Morris Abstract: It is commonly thought that Hume endorses the claim that causal cognition can be fully explained in terms of nothing but custom and habit. Associative learning does‚ of course‚ play a major role in the cognitive psychology of the Treatise. But Hume recognizes that associations cannot provide a complete account of causal thought. If human beings lacked
Premium David Hume Philosophy Psychology