Gideon V. Wainwright On June 2‚ 1961 there were some items stolen from Bay Harbor Pool Room‚ such as five dollars and a few bottles of beer and soda. Henry Cook told the police that he had seen Clarence Gideon walk out of the pool hall with a bottle of wine and his pockets filled with coins‚ then got into a taxi and left the joint. Major people that were involved were Clarence Earl Gideon the plaintiff‚ Louie L. Wainwright the defendant‚ H. G. Cochran‚ Jr. was the original respondent. The
Premium United States Constitution Gideon v. Wainwright Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Van Orden v. Perry 2005 Thomas Van Orden‚ an American Lawyer‚ challenged the State of Texas claiming that the placement of the Ten Commandment monument on state capital grounds was unconstitutional because it symbolized government endorsement of religion‚ violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment (Van Orden v. Perry Case Brief). The Supreme Court held the monument constitutional as it was merely a recognition of the Ten Commandment in American history and served no religious purposes
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
he applied directly to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus (”an order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion. (See‚ e.g. Cheney v. United States Dist. Court for D.C. (03-475) 542 U.S. 367 (2004) 334
Premium United States Constitution United States Supreme Court of the United States
Texas abortion law was unconstitutional as an assault of her right to privacy assured by the First‚ Fourth‚ Fifth‚ Ninth‚ and Fourteenth Amendments. The effects of the Roe v. Wade case
Premium Abortion Roe v. Wade Pregnancy
The Supreme Court case of Gregg V. Georgia dealt with administrative law‚ which is the legal field that regulates the due process clause in the Constitution. The clause is about the Government having the obligations to respect and uphold the legal rights of American people during and after they are arrested. Troy Leon Gregg and other inmates on death row believed that the death sentence was in direct violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments‚ which dealt with cruel and unusual punishment and that
Premium Capital punishment Gregg v. Georgia Capital punishment in the United States
King Henry V and The First Part of King Henry IV examine Henry (Hal)‚ a reckless prince that grows to become a respected King. Based on medieval beliefs‚ the King was known to have two bodies. In fact‚ in both plays Hal deals with the contradictory demands of his double body; the body natural and body politic. As a result of exploring the different aspects of Hal‚ an understanding of the important attributes of a King begins to develop. Throughout Shakespeare’s famous plays King Henry V and The First
Premium Henry IV of England Henry V of England William Shakespeare
Shakespeare deals with a parent-child relationship in the historical plays of Henry IV Parts One and Two in the characters of Henry Bullingsworth (Henry IV) and his son Hal (Prince of Wales‚ later Henry V). The fact stands clear in the development of the son‚ Hal: the son’s success in life is not dependent on his relationship to his father politically‚ but success is demonstrated when there is a realization of both parties on the level of parental love. Hal is not living up to his name‚ but also
Premium Henry V of England Henry IV of England
GONZALES V. RAICH‚ 545 U.S. 1 (2005) 352 F.3d 1222 Facts: Respondents contended that California’s Compassionate Use Act of 1996 exempted physicians‚ patients and care givers from criminal prosecution and allowed for the possession and cultivation of marijuana for medical purposes with the recommendation and approval of a physician. Respondents who suffered from medical conditions sought to avail themselves of this exemption. Because the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) enacted under the
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States Congress
“To what extent was the case of Brown v. Board of Education effective in the scope of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950-60s?” Table of Contents A. Plan of Investigation………………………………………………………………………………..….. 3 B. Summary of Evidence………………………………………………………………………………..… 3 C. Evaluation of Sources…………………………………………………………………………….…… 6 D. Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 E. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………..…. 9 F. Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………………………... 10
Premium Plessy v. Ferguson Brown v. Board of Education Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
from identifiable police officer‚ patrolling a high crime area‚ suspicious to justify the officer’s stop and frisk of that person? This was the question that the justices of the Supreme Court were asking themselves when they heard the case of Illinois v. Wardlow on the date of November 2‚ 1999. A few things happened in the U.S. government in 1999. In January‚ Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial began. Clinton would later be acquitted in February. In March‚ the Supreme Court upheld the murder
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Terry v. Ohio