"Hypothetical imperative" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 14 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    COMM 200 Communication Across Culture Fall 2013 Assignment 1 Television Fall Lineup and Imperatives According to Martin& Nakayama’s Intercultural Communication in Contexts (2010)six imperatives affect our abilities to effectively communicate across cultures because of ethnocentrism “a tendency to think our culture is superior to other cultures”(Martin & Nakayama 2010 p.5). To become competent in intercultural communications we need to acknowledge these differences

    Premium Big Bang Culture General relativity

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nestle's echical issue

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Week 3 Assignment:1 1. In what ways is the need to calculate utility a problem for utilitarianism? In my opinion the meaning of calculation of utility not so curtain and understandable. We know that some actions produce more pleasure for us than others but it is not difficult for us to rank actions in order of the pleasure they give us. Same time it is impossible to accurately measure how much pleasure they give us. What is the measurement of this action and how we can measure it? It has

    Premium Utilitarianism Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    DIFFERENT PERCEPTIONS OF GOD Pantheism: God exists in nature‚ everything is God and God is everything. Deism: The universe follows God’s Laws of order‚ also believed that God created the universe and its physical laws‚ set the universe into motion and then moved away‚ and also believed that god has no personal relationship with his humans. Theism: God and humans have a personal relationship and direct communication through prayers‚ meditations‚ etc.. Theism can be polytheistic (belief in one God)

    Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Categorical imperative

    • 642 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hypothetical and Scientific Reasoning VS Superstition In a large measure‚ science and superstition are polar opposites. Science is based on evidentiary support‚ objectivity and integrity‚ whereas superstition has very few of these. This is despite the fact that science originally evolved from superstition and theology‚ for example astronomy evolved from faith‚ chemistry from alchemy‚ etc. These were thought to be superstitions initially and only through a series of hypotheses‚ research‚ and argumentations

    Premium Scientific method Theory

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant Theory and Justice

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    actions should be judged based on an intrinsic moral law that says whether the action is right or wrong – period. Kant introduced the Categorical Imperative which is the central philosophy of his theory of morality‚ and an understandable approach to this moral law. It is divided into three formulations. The first formulation of Kant’s Categorical Imperative states that one should “always act in such a way that the maxim of your action can be willed as a universal law of humanity”; an act is either right

    Premium Discrimination Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant Deontological Theory

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Student Name: Veronica Ryan Student No: 20120035 Assignment: Kant Lecturer: Prof: Wamsley Due Date: 23 August 2013 ____________________________________________________________________ Emmanuel Kant was an influential German Philosopher. He was born in Konigsberg in Prussia to Protestant parents he lived from 1724 to 1804. Kant observed the world around him and observed that that every culture religion and society has moral law whether they are obeyed or not. The Formula of Universal Law-

    Premium Ethics Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Environmental Justice

    • 2381 Words
    • 10 Pages

    1. You should have a basic understanding of the terms ‘valid’ and ‘sound’ and be able to identify valid and sound arguments. 2. In the trial of Dudley and Stephens‚ how did the defense argue that Dudley and Stephens were innocent? Why does the prosecution reject this argument? How would a utilitarian judge the case? * They were argued to be innocent because it was out of necessity to kill the boy * Had they not killed and eaten the boy‚ they could have died * The boy was already

    Premium John Rawls Categorical imperative Social contract

    • 2381 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philosophical Inquiry

    • 4167 Words
    • 17 Pages

    PHILISOPHICAL INQUIRY: What is philosophy? “The love of wisdom.” Metaphysics: the theory of reality. What is real? Epistemology: the theory of knowledge. What does it mean to “know?” Value-theory: the study of value. What gives something value...over something else? Logic: The principles of right reasoning. What principles do we use? All of these do not stand independent from each other...they all mix. September 25: Abstractions: CH9 Is Fido an abstraction? Dog is a category

    Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Deontological ethics

    • 4167 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics Kantian Ethics

    • 2105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    checked with experience. With this we are able to carry out our duty. Kant produced two imperative commands to describe his theory. The first is the hypothetical imperative‚ and this does not command universally applicable moral rules. It states that you act in a certain way to achieve a goal‚ doing `A` to get to `B`‚ like practicing an instrument in order to improve. This differs from the categorical imperative (CI)‚ which forms the majority of

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 2105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    consistency. Both of these concepts lead to the principle of universalizability. He stated that‚ “An act is morally acceptable if and only if its maxim is universalizable.” To prove his statement he used two imperatives which are hypothetical imperatives and Categorical Imperatives. “Categorical Imperatives” is a single moral obligation that relates to the concept of duty which Kant defines as a major content in this obligation. Kant assessed the principle of universalizability by denying benevolence which

    Premium Morality Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 50