Aristotelian Approach to Rhetoric Basically‚ every argument persuades on the basis of three elements: Ethos Pathos Logos Some arguments rely more on one than another. As you read the following‚ consider‚ not only how the arguments we are reading in class use ethos‚ logos‚ and pathos‚ but the extent to which you rely on these in your own arguing‚ written and otherwise. Think of the sermon you heard this Sunday in church: which of these persuasive tools did your pastor use? Ethos This
Free Rhetoric Logic Deductive reasoning
Restating any rhetorical questions as declarative sentences Replacing emotive language with more purely cognitive language. Identify any assumptions List them as separate premises. Identify the type of argument – is it a generalization‚ a categorical syllogism‚ etc.? Finally‚ identify any fallacies it commits. (There may be more than one.) Argument 1: Pro-abortion liberals are wrong to make ‘choice’ the ultimate issue. No one has absolute freedom of choice sanctioned by law. One can choose to rob a
Premium Same-sex marriage Homosexuality Marriage
evaluating particular rhetorical acts. Again‚ it is particular. Week 2: World War II rhetorical situation; close textual analysis; strategic ambiguity; declarative tone; characterization; repetition; neo-classical criticism; ethos; logos; pathos; syllogism; enthymeme Rhetorical situation: Lloyd Bitzer’s theory on context‚ which includes: 1. Exigence- “imperfection marked by urgency” (ex. Pearl Harbor)‚ Exigence calls for discourse 2. Audience- “mediators of change” as a result of the speech
Premium Rhetoric
logical fallacy- logic of your topic deductive-general to specific inductive- specific to general syllogism- structure for reasoning fallacies- error in reasoning adhominem fallacy- statement that attempts to counter an arguement slippery slope fallacy- statement that attacks an arguement by taking it to such un extreme taht if appears ludicrous either/or fallacy- two alternatives and falsely suggest that one is rejected‚ the other must be accepted false cause fallacy-asserting that if an event
Free Rhetoric
PHL 101 November 5‚ 2012 Deductive Arguments and Fallacies in the Presidential Debates Politics has always been one of the subjects where people use all sorts of different words and styles to convince people that their choices are the right choices. It isn’t surprising that one of the easiest places to find deductive arguments and fallacies is during one of the largest broadcasted and viewed political events‚ the Presidential Debates. In this paper I will point out a deductive argument
Premium
Legal Reasoning is a reasonable reasoning before the decision had been made. Legal reasoning required us to consider the criteria beyond those imposed by the strict necessity of logic. It has followed certain criteria or rules which applied in practical reasoning. For an example‚ a judge has to give judgment by following the precedent case and Federal Constitution‚ legislators have to predict the impact of their laws before amendment whereby following the two-third majority of Parliament and lawyers
Premium Logic Reasoning
persuade different characters through appeals to Logos‚ which indicates his true qualities and aspects‚ and how they reflect his motifs. To appeal to Logos‚ one must appeal to the logical side of a person’s mentality; they must use reasoning and syllogism to persuade another person into believing that their opinion is completely logical‚ and is therefore the best decision to make. This can be seen in Cassius numerous times‚ and it establishes how he is calculating‚ logical‚ and cold. In the second
Free Rhetoric Roman Republic Julius Caesar
when the inference circumvents logical reasoning? Student Answer: No one will understand you. A fallacy has been committed. One has proven to be a good logician. One ought to use inductive reasoning. The syllogism is sound. Instructor Explanation: Tutorial Points Received: 4 of 4 Comments: Question 2. Question : A car salesman says this‚ in order to get you to buy a new car from him: "Buddy! You gotta buy this car. You’ve seen
Free Logic Inductive reasoning Reasoning
| Connections and Contrasts of Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes | | | | The Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting One’s Reason and of Seeking Truth in the Sciences is one of the most influential works in the history of modern philosophy‚ and important to the evolution of natural sciences. In this work‚ Descartes tackles the problem of skepticism. Descartes modified it to account for a truth he found to be incontrovertible. Descartes started his line of reasoning by doubting everything
Premium Scientific method Logic Reasoning
Justifications for Geometry Proofs – Ch 3 Properties of Equality (=): Addition: a = b → a + c = b + c Subtraction: a = b → a – c = b - c Division: a = b → a / c = b / c Multiplication: a = b → a * b = b * c Distributive: a ( b + c ) = a * b + a * c Substitution: a = b → a can be substituted for b in an equation Properties of Congruence and Equality ( and =): Reflexive: ab = ab or Symmetric: a = b → b = a or ∠A ∠B → ∠B ∠A Transitive: a = b and b = c → a = c or ∠A
Premium Angle