UNDERSTANDING INTEGRATED MARKETING COMMUNICATION (IMC) Prior research has revealed numerous topics relevant in the study of integrated marketing communications and how marketer should best handle the IMC process in order to develop truly integrated communication programs (Cook 1997; Kitchen and Schultz 1999; Schultz and Kitchen 1997). Schultz and Schultz (1998) defines IMC as a “strategic business process used to plan‚ develop‚ execute and evaluate coordinated‚ measurable‚ persuasive brand communication
Premium Marketing
A SUMMER TRAINING REPORT ON MARKETING STRATEGY OF NIKE AT “NIKESHOES INDUSTRIES LIMITED” SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT OF BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (BBA) TRAINING SUPERVISOR SUBMITTED BY SESSION 2005-2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The present work is an effort to throw some light on Marketing Strategy of Nike at “Nike Industries Limited”. The work would not have been possible to come to the present shape without the able guidance‚ supervision and help
Premium Athletic shoe Nike, Inc. Marketing
motives so as to design advertising programs and promotional activities accordingly. Breeze‚ which has long been Unilever’s flagship detergent brand sold in Thailand‚ is a very good example for IMC strategy utilization. The new campaign of Breeze is one of good examples on using IMC strategy. Breeze has launched its new campaign “Dirt is good” since the year 2546‚ and has expanded its target groups from housewives to little children and teachers. The company captures attention and induces
Premium Marketing
this‚ Nike introduces its latest products through a marketing communication group that can strengthen the “positioning of‚ and key messages about‚ the Nike brand‚” through different forms of visual aids and point-of-purchase advertising. In connection to this‚ Nike continuously aims to apply marketing tactics that are appropriate with the people who reside in these continents or nations. For example‚ aside from traditional advertising in the form of television‚ billboards‚ and the like‚ Nike also
Premium Marketing Advertising
we used market value based on the share price of Nike on July 5‚ 2001and number of shares outstanding‚ which resulted in the weights of debt and equity of 10.2% and 89.8% respectively (see Exhibit 2). Cost of Debt: Cost of debt was calculated by Ms. Cohen by finding the historical interest rate of 2.7% and tax rate of 38%. We agree with her estimation of the tax rate of 38%‚ but calculated a cost of debt of 7.17% based on the market price of Nike bonds and finding their yield to maturity (see Exhibit
Premium Stock Weighted average cost of capital Financial markets
BRAND MANAGMENT Nike: Building a Global Brand Case analysis Ahmed Coucha 800090353 6/29/2011 Dr. Ibrahim Hegazy 2 How would you characterize Nike’s brand image and sources of brand equity in the U.S? Nike’s Brand image in the US: Brand image is the impression in the consumers’ mind of a brand’s total personality (real and imaginary qualities and shortcomings). It is set of feelings‚ emotions and experiences that are linked to the brand. While brand personality is the image the company wants
Premium Brand Brand management
(13% today w/ first clean slate in FY14)‚ international presence (step-back before forward)‚ and square footage growth opportunity at Outlets as leases (typically 5 year) come due. In other words‚ growing pains. Boss also started coverage of Nike Inc. (NKE)‚ giving the company a Hold rating and a $100 price target‚ a touch above today’s $99 share price. He touts Nike’s best-in-class position in its category and also points favorably to its balance sheet: With annual free cash flow generation
Premium Stock market Stock Free cash flow
Case: Shoes for Moos INC Executive Summary Now Shoes for Moos is only a potential company built by Jim. The product is the special shoe for cows‚ combined with foot treatment‚ easy cleaning‚ durable and reusable. Jim hired his bother-in-law‚ Tom and have a limited amount of investment capital. Jim is trying to make a decision that chooses an alternative to distribute and promote their products. Decision Statement Starting Shoes for Moos is feasible. Considering
Premium Milk Cattle Dairy farming
GA-3 Prepared K.E;M.B.(1/13/2012) Apollo Shoes‚ Inc. Relevant Matters Based on Minutes (December 31‚ 2011) Information Relevant to 2010 Audit 1. Remarks by Apollo Shoes Inc. CEO Larry Lancaster in regards to the 10% projected increase in sales for the 2011fiscal year. (“Well they better increase by that much or heads will roll.”) GA-3.1 2. Majority vote by members of the board to internalize
Premium Board of directors Corporate governance
Case study: Nike: the Sweatshop Debate 1) Should Nike be held responsible for working condition in factories that it does not own‚ but where sub-contractors make products for Nike? Nike doesn’t own any manufacturing facilities and outsource its production. Therefore‚ it can’t be directly blamed for terrible working conditions. Nike can influence indirectly on working conditions at contracting factories thorough refusing to work with sweatshop factories. However‚ Nike‚ like any other capitalistic
Premium Labor Business ethics