University of Phoenix Material Ethical Dilemma Worksheet Incident Review 1. What is the ethical issue or problem? Identify the issue succinctly. | The ethical dilemma is whether the Probation Officer should base his recommendation taking into account what the husband went through for his country ‚ or just based on a literal interpretation of the law. | 2. What are the most important facts? Which facts have the most bearing on the ethical decision presented? Include any important
Premium Crime Police
Ethical Manifesto COM450 Communication Ethics University of Phoenix Ethical Manifesto Categorical Imperative and Golden Mean are the models of ethical decision making that most mirror my own ethical decision making practices. Categorical Imperative closely models my own ethical decision making practices. Its moral universalism has been widely influential on equality and human rights. When faced with an ethical decision‚ I try to weigh what is best for me and what is best for all parties involved
Premium Philosophy Immanuel Kant Decision making
Kant‚ Thucydides‚ and Weber collectively agreed on one premise – human nature directly affect the political actions of a state‚ whether they be moral or immoral. Given the different time periods each of these political theorists studied in‚ each man had vastly different ideas on the consequences of human nature on political actions‚ or vice versa. Thucydides was a consequentialist‚ Kant was a staunch deontologist‚ and Weber believed that both consequentialism and deontology had their own place within
Premium Political philosophy Religion Plato
Humor Theories There are three leading theories of humor that serve as the intellectual foundation for what is considered funny. These three theories are the superiority‚ relief‚ and incongruity theories. The superiority theory focuses on the dark side of comedy‚ asserting that we laugh in response to our perceived supremacy over other’s unfortunate situations or social rank. The relief theory claims that humor is a form of releasing excessive energy. Lastly the incongruity theory says that something
Premium Theories of humor Psychology Immanuel Kant
According to Kant‚ the fundamental principle of morality must be a categorical‚ rather than a hypothetical imperative‚ because an imperative based on reason alone is one that is a necessary truth‚ is a priori‚ and is one that applies to us because we are rational beings capable of fulfilling our moral obligations. Kant explains this essential truth is how "an action as objectively necessary in itself apart from its relation to a further end". This refers to how if the supreme principle of morality
Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics
University of Phoenix Material Ethical Dilemma Worksheet Incident Review |What is the ethical issue or problem? Identify the issue succinctly. | |The ethical issue that is presented is the officers know that the husband was driving while intoxicated; they know that he has | |lied‚ and they know based off of the 911 call that the wife was abused. The law states that nothing can be done because nothing | |was observed
Premium Ethics
). Describing morality is rather simple‚ but what’s left to question is what determines the rightness or goodness of a thing or action. Using two ethical theories‚ Social Construct Theory and Kantian Theory I propose the answer to this question; the morality of an action is determined by agreements and the “categorical imperative”. Social Contract Theory is based on the idea that actions are morally right if they are made under an agreement. This agreement doesn’t necessarily have to be communicated
Premium Morality Ethics Virtue
Ethical Dilemmas 1) You are a prosecutor in a jurisdiction that does not use the grand jury system. An elderly man has administered a lethal dose of sleeping tablets to his wife ‚who was suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. He calmly turned himself in to the police department‚ and the case is on the front page of the paper. It is entirely up to you whether to charge him with murder. What would you do? What criteria did you use to arrive at your decision? 2) You are a probation officer and
Premium Crime Jury Police
Gillespie‚ William. Yates Jeffery. The Problem of Sport Violence and the Criminal Prosecution Solution. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:Xldr12ruuswJ:www.uga.edu/pol-sci/cjcornelljlpp.pdf++Violence+in+sport+criminal+matter Kant‚ Immanuel. Foundations of Metaphysics of Morals Lapchick‚ R. (2000). When Sports Violence is a Criminal Act. Christian Science Monitor‚ Vol. 92‚ 1-3. Out of Bounds: Professional Sports Leagues and Domestic Violence (5th ed.). (1996). Cambridge‚ Mass:
Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Hypothetical imperative
Analyze the differences between ethical concepts‚ principles‚ theories‚ and tradition Mizzoni (2010) explains that understanding the distinction between ethical concepts‚ principles‚ theories‚ and traditions is part of the framework that may help one answer the philosophical problem about right and wrong. These terms will be briefly described and analyzed below. Ethical concepts Ethical concepts are described as the most basic building blocks of ethics (Mizzoni‚ 2010). They are thoughts or notions—
Premium Ethics Virtue ethics