"Immanuel kant vs david humes" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 22 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Korsgaard on Kant

    • 21080 Words
    • 85 Pages

    begins on next page) 1 Ka n t ’ s F o rmu l a o f U n i v e rs a l L a w C h r i sti n e M . K o rs gaar d Kant ’s first formulation of t h e Cat e gorical Imperative ‚ t h e Formula of Universal Law‚ runs: Act only according t o t hat maxim by which you can at t h e same time will t hat it should b ecome a universal law. (G 421/39) 1 A few lines lat er‚ Kant says that t h is is eq uivale nt t o acting as th ough your maxim were b y your will t o become a law of nat ure ‚ and

    Premium Trigraph

    • 21080 Words
    • 85 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Appendix I.‚ Concerning Moral Sentiment‚ David Hume looks to find a place in morality for reason‚ and sentiment. Through‚ five principles he ultimately concludes that reason has no place within the concept of morality‚ but rather is something that can only assist sentiment in matters concerning morality. And while reason can be true or false‚ those truths or falsities apply to facts‚ not to morality. He then argues morals are the direct result of sentiment‚ or the inner feeling within a human

    Premium Morality Ethics

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kantian Ethics

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kantian ethics can be used to analyze the moral implications of James’ decision without considering the consequences that occurred afterwards. Immanuel Kant’s theory of morality is based off of two virtues: good will and duty. Kant believed that good will is pure when analyzed morally whether or not the intentions of the good will succeeded or failed. To broaden the critique‚ a person’s good will can also be analyzed alongside a person’s

    Premium Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reaction to Kant

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6/25/2014 Philosophy 201 Reaction to Kant Kant Kant first draws close to differentiating between a moral choice and a prudent choice. A prudent choice is a choice used in good judgment and is rational. Kant has no interest in morality being rational. A law is a law and thou shall obey it. The moral law is absolute. Thou shall not lie‚ means exactly what it says‚ thou shall not lie. No ifs‚ ands or buts about it. There is no reason why a person should lie because it is our duty as moral

    Free Morality

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Kant‚ he believes that the only thing unconditionally good is good will. Good will is the idea of people having to do ones moral duty. Kant’s ethical theories are based off of the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives‚ as stated during class‚ act only on those rules that you can rationally will to be universal. In response to Kant’s theory‚ I believe that good will is not the only thing that is unconditionally good. I believe this because there will be many instances in life

    Premium Ethics John Stuart Mill Categorical imperative

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As per the reading material‚ Immanuel Kant set forward a deontological type of morals‚ which permits people to be self-governing. Inside of this hypothesis there are two sorts of imperatives; the hypothetical imperative that charges that assign certain activities to accomplish certain finishes (Pollock‚ 2013‚ p. 34). For instance‚ in the event that you need a pet‚ then you must show obligation. By difference‚ a categorical imperative summons activity that is essential with no reference to planned

    Premium

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant or Mill

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Instructor Gallup Kant or Mill 14 November 2011 The topic of Kant and John Stuart Mill produces much debate. Both scholars have their own beliefs that they deem to be appropriate point of views in the way man should view a moral life. In this paper I plan on elaborating on both Kant and Mill’s point of views. This paper will first talk about John Stuart Mill’s beliefs on morality and what he deems appropriate. Then in the next segment of the paper‚ Kant views will be dissected and discussed

    Premium Morality Ethics John Stuart Mill

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I first began comparing the two different statues of David‚ Bernini’s Baroque "David‚ and "Michelangelo’s Renaissance "David" the first thing that came to my attention was the facial features. As you study the face of Michelangelo’s "David" there is a sense of calmness to it. There is little or no emotion depicted in his face whatsoever. Here is a man‚ ready to face a giant with nothing more than a sling‚ a stone‚ and his faith in God‚ yet there is no emotion on his face. No signs of fear‚ anger

    Premium Renaissance David Goliath

    • 981 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    proper‚ good‚ and right. These fundamentals define if the behavior is evil‚ wrong or not satisfactory. Immanuel Kant stated that ethics should not be limited to personal desires‚ but also extend to one’s duty. His philosophy states that all individuals are born with intrinsic freedom‚ allowing them to make decisions‚ implying that we should make efforts to live morally and ethically. Kant argues that every lie that people give it contradicts moral goodness and steals others their freedom to rationally

    Premium Morality Philosophy Ethics

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    sculptures of David from Michelangelo and Gian Lorenzo Bernini. The similarities and differences are listed below: Similarities: 1). Both sculptures represent the same popular subject matter who is the biblical David during the battle with Goliath. 2). Both sculptures use marble as the material. 3). Both sculptures show the strength‚ confidence‚ beauty and concentration in the hero David during a combat. Differences: 1). Michelangelo’s David is completed by 1504 and Bernini’s David is completed

    Free Gian Lorenzo Bernini

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 50