elow is a diagram of the hierarchy of the Irish court system. Civil Courts Civil courts deals with civil or private wrongs. In a Civil case the burden required is on the balance of probabilities. In most civil cases there will be a plaintiff and a defendant‚ the plaintiff sues the defendant. In civil proceedings the judgment would be to impose a settlement on the matter. eg‚ awarding damages‚ an injunction or an order for specific performance. Land law‚ employment law‚ contractual law‚ consumer
Free Criminal law Law Appeal
structure of the English courts within which a decision of a higher court will be binding on a court lower in the hierarchy. However‚ there have been occasions where the Court of Appeal departed from the decisions of the House of Lords this has been treated with hostility by the Supreme Court. The Court of Appeal is bound by decisions of the House of Lords even if it considers them to be wrong. It was also bound by its own decision‚ however in Young v Bristol Aeroplane‚ the Court of Appeal held that
Premium Stare decisis Case law
Question: First of all‚ where do you want to see the court take the country? And secondly‚ what’s your view on how the constitution should be interpreted? Do the founders’ words mean what they say or is it a living document to be applied flexibly‚ according to changing circumstances? Who won: Clinton won because she wants to have more of a living document that can change when it needs to be changed. Question:Do you want the court‚ including the justices that you will name‚ to overturn Roe v.
Premium Abortion Roe v. Wade Pregnancy
Justices deny review over students’ religious messages in classroom By Bill Mears‚ CNN Supreme Court Producer updated 3:41 PM EDT‚ Mon June 11‚ 2012 STORY HIGHLIGHTS Washington (CNN) -- In what have become known as the "Jesus pencil" and "candy cane" cases‚ the Supreme Court refused Monday to consider appeals from the families of elementary school students over distribution of religious-themed gifts on campus. At issue was whether school officials can be sued for violating the First Amendment
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
better the entire community. They’re taking advantage of this clause by misleading the people that they’re property will be used to better the entire community‚ which in reality the government is actually giving them to corporations. As a result‚ the court case Kelo v. City of New London‚ Connecticut and an incident with a Dallas Councilwoman served as an eye-opener to what the government is really doing to Americans
Premium United States Economics Government
VOL 18 NO -301 REGD NO DA 1589 | Dhaka‚ Saturday September 3 2011 Mobile courts and independence of judiciary M S Siddiqui In a democratic country it is a prerequisite that all citizens get economic and social justice. The economically deprived people need either free or state sponsored legal assistance to get justice and fair trial. This will uphold human rights and equality. This is a component of rule of law for any society. It is not a charity‚ but a civil right of the citizens. It ensures
Premium Judge Law Separation of powers
ASSESSMENT ITEM 1: Reflection Journal Even before entering courtroom it was evident how nervous every single student in the group I was in was‚ from the way everyone slowly crept forward‚ reluctant to be the first one through the door. I had to steel my nerves before pushing the door to District Courtroom 11 open. The trial I experienced was the murder of a pair of infant twins due to a lack of sustenance and nutrition in June 2008 (Dick & Kellet‚ 2008) The accused parties‚ (LWS009 Study Guide
Premium Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom Court Bench
The history evolution of the federal courts began to evolve as early as the Constitutional Convention held in 1787. It was during the Constitutional Convention that a resolution was adopted that “a national judiciary be established” (Neubauer & Fradella‚ 2008‚ p. 65). Of course‚ there was considerable disagreement between federalists and anti-federalists. The disagreement surrounded the fact the anti-federalists feared that individual liberties could be weakened. According to Neubauer and Fradella
Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States
was in a program called "Teen Court". It was a special program that not all kids could go to. Mostly we would go every month . Since we we’re there every time. They decided to reward us with a field trip to Castles N’ Coasters. But the downside to it was that it was my friend Victorias last field trip. The people who were involved were Victoria‚Katie‚‚Brianna‚Her friend‚ and I This happened around 6th grade at the end of the year. When we first got there they made us stand in two separate lines
Premium
Would it be to the advantage of the taxpayer and the juveniles to split the juvenile courts into two sections? Explain in detail why or why not. There would a lot of people favorable circumstances of the taxpaying and the juveniles with part those adolescent courts under two areas since it will profit taxpaying and juveniles by Part under segments. Toward finishing that status wrongdoers will get a greater amount help What’s more treat similarly as a minor wrongdoing offender‚ which they don’t
Premium Crime Criminology Criminal justice