Indirect rule was a system of ruling Africans that sought not to displace African authority‚ but instead to rule through it. It was first used by the British and later adopted by other European powers after they witnessed its success. Indirect rule is largely considered a more humane alternative to its counterpart‚ direct rule‚ which placed colonial powers in charge of all aspects of African administration. Despite this‚ there were numerous problems with indirect rule in both theory and in practice
Premium Colonialism Africa British Empire
THE HAMBURG RULES: DID IT INCREASE THE LIABILITY OF THE CARRIER? BY KWEKU GYAN AINUSON (Under The Direction of Professor Gabriel Wilner) ABSTRACT The Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea (Hamburg rules) was hoped to provide a uniform modern commercial code for the international carriage of goods by sea. However‚ after 26 years after the diplomatic conference and nearly 13 years after it came into force‚ the rules have not been ratified by the world’s major maritime powers. The main
Premium Law of the sea Commercial item transport and distribution United Nations
BUTT‚ PARNELL AND THE EARLY YEARS OF HOME RULE 4.1 Gladstone’s Reforms and the Start of Home Rule Gladstone and Ireland the early years. No HR party until 1873 so Liberals appreciated Catholic and Presbyterian vote in Ireland. Liberal MPs drew Gladstone’s attention to: • Privileged position of C of I • Land question • Catholic education 1868 Gladstone became PM. ‘My mission…’ 1869 Disestablishment 1870 Gladstone’s First Land Act (made Ulster Custom law where it existed and made landlords
Premium Catholic Church Irish nationalism Ireland
GPR 109: LEGAL SYSTEM AND METHOD LEGAL METHOD TAKE AWAY CAT NKARICHIA MUGAMBI DENNIS G34/3053/2013 Q; there are some rules of language’ used by courts and the legal profession in studying or interpreting written law. They are more of rules of practice than legal rules. Outline the most common of these and give a brief commentary or explanation of the same. RULES OF LANGUAGE IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION. The traditional common-law approach to statutory interpretation was to "look at the words
Premium
The exclusionary rule is a law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. Now imagine how our system would function without the exclusionary rule. A police officer could detain‚ arrest or search an individual and his property based on bias‚ a hunch or because they just felt like it‚ without reasonable cause. If the officer discovered in criminating evidence‚ it could be freely admitted at the individual’s criminal trial. And that evidence that is found without the
Premium Police United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
committed‚ do a search of a person’s property and confiscate any relevant evidence to the crime. the exclusionary rule is a rule that allows for the exclusion or suppression of evidence. This role prevents the government from using evidence in trial which was to be derived from an illegal search and seizure arrestor interrogation. There are several exceptions to the exclusionary rule that I have found and these are: 1. The good-faith exception-any evidence gained by law enforcement using a search
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Law
The newspaper chosen for this assignment is New Straits Times. The three Harrower’s “Rules of Thumb” guidelines that will be discussed in this assessment are headlines‚ layout and design as well as photos. 1. Headlines Headline is the basic element in designing a newspaper and plays a very significant role because the first thing readers will see on the newspaper is the headline (Paul‚ 2014). Without a good headline‚ even the best stories become useless because most people will only read the stories
Premium Rectangle Newspaper Rule of thumb
I find that the evidence would still be valid based on the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. The good faith exception states “that If officers had a reasonable‚ good-faith belief that they were acting per legal authority‚ such as by relying on a search warrant that is later found to have been legally defective‚ the illegally seized evidence is admissible” (Busby‚ 2009). The good faith exception was established by a 6-3 U.S Supreme court decision in the United States v. Leon 468 U
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
Understanding All of the Rules for Professional Baseball Baseball is a game that everyone knows and most people love watching. The premise behind it is simple. One person throws the ball and another hits it with a bat. From there‚ upon a successful hit‚ the hitter runs around bases to try and reach home base‚ while others catch the ball and try to stop him. However‚ the rules for baseball are a little more complex and they have been fine tuned for many years to give us the rules that we have today. If
Premium Baseball Major League Baseball San Francisco Giants
1. The Hague Rules 2. The Hague-Visby Rules 3. The Hamburg Rules 4. The Rotterdam Rules Commentary on the Rotterdam Rules Ⅰ Introduction: Background of the Rotterdam Rules It is known for quite a long time that there are no international conventions regulating multimodal transport which has been widely used in practise with the globalization of national economies and development of commercial system. Since the Hague Rules‚ Hague-Visby Rules and the Hamburg
Premium Law of the sea Law Transport