6.a) A deductive inference is a logical linguistic sense of validity meaning it takes the premises and the general ideas that come with them and provides a conclusion. Inductive inference is the opposite as it requires an evidential sense of validity that follows from the might of the evidence which means the conclusion is directly from what is stated in the premises. The difference being that deductive requires a knowledge outside of what is stated and inductive does not. b) Deductive is non-ampliative
Premium God Morality Ethics
Biology Laboratory Research Paper I. The Scientific Method Scientists see the world from a different perspective. Scientists observe the environment and the surroundings and ask questions. Once questions are formulated the next step for a scientist is to try and come up with answers. This method of inquiry and analysis is called the scientific method. As previously mentioned the scientific method starts by asking questions and then trying to find answers. "Scientists use the scientific method
Premium Scientific method
Legal Reasoning is a reasonable reasoning before the decision had been made. Legal reasoning required us to consider the criteria beyond those imposed by the strict necessity of logic. It has followed certain criteria or rules which applied in practical reasoning. For an example‚ a judge has to give judgment by following the precedent case and Federal Constitution‚ legislators have to predict the impact of their laws before amendment whereby following the two-third majority of Parliament and lawyers
Premium Logic Reasoning
1. Which of the following standards of thinking relates to how one might verify the truth of a statement or claim? (Points :1) Clarity Relevance Depth Accuracy Breadth Question 2. 2. Although Marquis had been working on research for a year‚ he listened to the other people at his company as they presented different conclusions after his presentation and examined their ideas in the hope of finding out new information. Marquis displayed which
Premium Logical fallacies Fallacy
knowledge‚ and deductive and inductive approaches for teaching grammar. This procedure has been derived from my great interest in innovative grammar teaching and my teaching experience in grammar. The proposed steps are expected to be an alternative pathway for English teachers to teach grammar‚ particularly teaching tenses and modals at college-university levels or even in secondary schools. KEYWORDS: Practice and consciousness-raising‚ explicit/implicit knowledge‚ deductive/inductive approaches‚ English
Free Linguistics Grammar Grammatical tenses
Writing From Sources Notes Chapter 1: “Understanding Evidence and Reasoning” to Exercise 6 (p. 40-62) 1) The credibility of the thesis depends on the evidence and reasoning. a) Evidence refers to any kind of concrete information that can support a thesis. Evidence can take several forms: i) Facts and statistics‚ especially in social science. ii) Surveys (1) Depend on generalizing from a representative sample‚ based on an appropriate “population” (use limited
Premium Logic Reasoning Deductive reasoning
world. Deductive‚ inductive and abductive reasoning in the context of cyber forensics analysis. Processes that assist in developing a case hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. Validation processes that check and test the correctness of the digital evidence exhibits and their relationships with corroborating evidence relied on in legal cases. Processes that would enhance the communication of and presentation of case analysis to the legal practitioner and courts. Deductive‚ inductive and abductive
Premium Forensic science Scientific method Inductive reasoning
Today‚ using social media is one of the most common activities of children‚ adolescents‚ and adults. The term social media refers to the websites that are built for interaction among people. These sites include social media websites‚ such as‚ Twitter‚ MySpace‚ Facebook; virtual world and gaming sites‚ such as‚ Second life‚ and Sims‚ Videos websites‚ like YouTube etc. These website provide entertainment and communication to the masses‚ and significant part of these masses‚ is children and adolescents
Premium Facebook Social network service Social media
Theories and Hypotheses: The Differences and Similarities Abstract This paper is an examination of theories and hypotheses‚ their differences and similarities. The four major types of theories studied are Deductive‚ Inductive‚ Grounded and Axiomatic. Each type of theories is introduced and explained. Additionally‚ a hypothesis is defined in relation to a theory‚ and the key differences between the two explained. The variables which exist between the theories
Premium Theory Scientific method Hypothesis
reasoning implying conclusion‚ if A then B. A. Two kinds of arguments Deductive arguments- prove the conclusion. Must be valid- isn’t possible for the premise to be true and the conclusion false. Sound argument is also true Inductive arguments- supports conclusion Like evidence in court‚ gives reasonable consideration toward conclusion Beyond a reasonable doubt- somewhat lower standard than deductive proof Deduction‚ induction‚ and unstated premises- in real life arguments
Premium Logic Reasoning Critical thinking