statute that governs this order is A.R.S. § 13-3624(C). It can be requested by a law enforcement officer and it is not required that the plaintiff be present. This type of order is limited to parties who meet specific relationship guidelines. An injunction against harassment‚ governed by A.R.S. § 12-809‚ has no relationship limitations; it is used to prevent acts of harassment which are not classified as domestic violence.
Premium Law Human rights Federal Emergency Management Agency
standing to settle indigenous land titles. 2. Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia (1831) Honorable Cherokee Chief John Ross tried to defend Cherokee plots‚ contest relocation‚ and prevent the State of Georgia from imposing on them by requesting for an injunction in the
Premium
Freedom of Speech In this reading‚ Hentoff continues to examine how Americans repress each other on matters regarding freedom of speech. He argues that it is easy for Americans to support freedom of speech in general but the same people change tact when they are negatively affected by other individuals’ exercise of free speech. To demonstrate the rising level of attack on free expression‚ Hentoff gives the example of opposition to a march planned by the American Nazi Party through Skokie‚ an area
Premium Freedom of speech United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
law you have the right to have the courts tell your abuser to stop harassing or hurting you‚ or to simply stay away from your home. This can be done by seeking an injunction from the civil courts. It is under civil law that an individual can seek a court order through family court for custody of children. Two main types of injunction that you can apply for: 1. A non-molestation order. The main aim of this court order is to prevent your partner from displaying threatening behaviour or using abuse
Premium Assault Abuse Domestic violence
of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Victor Marrero‚ Judge) denying a motion for a preliminary injunction against alleged trademark infringement by Yves Saint Laurent‚ a competing fashion house ("YSL"). The District Court found that Louboutin’s trademark was likely not enforceable and declined to enter a preliminary injunction against YSL’s use of the trademark. We conclude that the District Court’s holding that a single color can never serve as a trademark
Premium Trademark
jury found the NTP patents valid and RIM was found to have infringed them. In addition to $33 million for damages‚ the judge ordered RIM to pay an additional $20 million in punitive damages (since their infringement was “willful”) and issued an injunction that would have shut down the entire US BlackBerry system. Further litigation ensued‚ and eventually RIM was forced to settle with NTP to the tune of $612.5 million. At the crux of the issue was the patent criterion of “prior art;” even though
Premium Patent Patent law 2004 albums
In the United States in 1971‚ Nixon was still in his first term and the Vietnam War was still going on. Charles Mason was found guilty for the 1969 Tate-LaBianca Murder‚ where Mason Family were found guilty of killing actress Sharon Tate‚ who was pregnant‚ and‚ and several of her friends and a stranger who happened to be on the property‚ and the earlier killing of Leno LaBianca and his wife. “Chua-Eoan‚ Howard. Par. 1.” On February 9‚ 1971‚ in San Fernando‚ California‚ an earthquake hit destroyed
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution First Amendment to the United States Constitution
July 23‚ 2013 Supreme Court Case (Bush vs.Gore) In Bush v. Gore (2000)‚ a divided Supreme Court ruled that the state of Florida’s court-ordered manual recount of vote ballots in the 2000 presidential election was unconstitutional. The case proved to be the climax of the contentious presidential race between Vice President Al Gore and Texas Governor George W. Bush. The outcome of the election hinged on Florida‚ where Governor Bush led Vice President Gore by about 1‚800 votes the morning after Election
Premium George W. Bush Al Gore President of the United States
THE ROLE OF TORT LAW Compensatory Function: -Compensation for people who are injured by a wrong‚ injury to the person ‚ or to the property Torts law can be divided into trespass action on the case and statutory torts TORT LAW REFORM Torts law used to be judge made‚ similar to common law 20th century statues came in Workers Compensation scheme‚ Motor Accidents Scheme‚ Occupational Health and Safety (Factories Act)‚ Dust Diseases Schemes. Drug Compensation Schemes (uk). Characteristics
Premium Tort Tort law
In Malaysia‚ our contract law is basically governed and enforced by the Contract Act 1950. The remedy of specific performance presupposes the existence of a valid contract between the parties to the controversy. The terms of the contract must be definite and certain. This is significant because equity cannot be expected to enforce either an invalid contract or one that is so vague in its terms that equity cannot determine exactly what it must order each party to perform. It would be unjust for a
Premium Contract